Reprinted from the Journal of Philosophy, Psychology1 and Scientific Methods, vol. III, No. 96, December 20, 1906; and ibid., vol. IV, No. 4, February 14, 1907, where the original is entitled “A Reply to Mr. Pitkin.” Ed.
ALTHOUGH Mr. Pitkin does not name me in his acute article on radical2 empiricism, 97] [ . . . ] I fear that some readers, knowing me to have applied3 that name to my own doctrine4, may possibly consider themselves to have been in at my death.
In point of fact my withers5 are entirely6 unwrung. I have, indeed, said 98that 'to be radical, an empiricism must not admit into its constructions any element that is not directly experienced! But in my own radical empiricism this is only a methodological postulate7, not a conclusion supposed to flow from the intrinsic absurdity8 of transempirical objects. I have never felt the slightest respect for the idealistic arguments which Mr. Pitkin attacks and of which Ferrier made such striking use; and I am perfectly9 willing to admit any number of noumenal beings or events into philosophy if only their pragmatic value can be shown.
Radical empiricism and pragmatism have so many misunderstandings to suffer from, that it seems my duty not to let this one go any farther, uncorrected.
Mr. Pitkin's 'reply' to me,99 perplexes me by the obscurity of style which I find in almost all our younger philosophers. He asks me, however, two direct questions which I understand, so I take the liberty of answering.
First he asks: Do not experience and science show ‘that countless10 things are 100 experienced as that which they are not or are only partially11?’ I reply: Yes, assuredly, as, for example, ‘things’ distorted by refractive media, ‘molecules,’ or whatever else is taken to be more ultimately real than the immediate12 content of the perceptive13 moment.
Secondly14: "If experience is self-supporting 101 (in any intelligible15 sense) does this fact preclude16 the possibility of (a) something not experienced and (b) action of experience upon a noumenon?”
My reply is: Assuredly not the possibility of either — how could it? Yet in my opinion we should be wise not to consider any thing or action of that nature, and to restrict our universe of philosophic17 discourse18 to what is experienced or, at least, experienceable.102
1 psychology | |
n.心理,心理学,心理状态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 radical | |
n.激进份子,原子团,根号;adj.根本的,激进的,彻底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 applied | |
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 withers | |
马肩隆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 postulate | |
n.假定,基本条件;vt.要求,假定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 absurdity | |
n.荒谬,愚蠢;谬论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 countless | |
adj.无数的,多得不计其数的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 partially | |
adv.部分地,从某些方面讲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 perceptive | |
adj.知觉的,有洞察力的,感知的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 secondly | |
adv.第二,其次 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 intelligible | |
adj.可理解的,明白易懂的,清楚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 preclude | |
vt.阻止,排除,防止;妨碍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 philosophic | |
adj.哲学的,贤明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 discourse | |
n.论文,演说;谈话;话语;vi.讲述,著述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |