We here treat of a question of the greatest difficulty and importance. It relates to the whole of human life. It would be of much greater consequence to find a remedy for our evils; but no remedy is to be discovered, and we are reduced to the sad necessity of tracing out their origin. With respect to this origin, men have disputed ever since the days of Zoroaster, and in all probability they disputed on the same subject long before him. It was to explain the mixture of good and evil that they conceived the idea of two principles — Oromazes, the author of light, and Arimanes, the author of darkness; the box of Pandora; the two vessels1 of Jupiter; the apple eaten by Eve; and a variety of other systems. The first of dialecticians, although not the first of philosophers, the illustrious Bayle, has clearly shown how difficult it is for Christians3 who admit one only God, perfectly4 good and just, to reply to the objections of the Manich?ans who acknowledge two Gods — one good, and the other evil.
The foundation of the system of the Manich?ans, with all its antiquity5, was not on that account more reasonable. Lemmas, susceptible6 of the most clear and rigid7 geometrical demonstrations9, should alone have induced any men to the adoption10 of such a theorem as the following: “There are two necessary beings, both supreme11, both infinite, both equally powerful, both in conflict with each other, yet, finally, agreeing to pour out upon this little planet — one, all the treasures of his beneficence, and the other all the stores of his malice12.” It is in vain that the advocates of this hypothesis attempt to explain by it the cause of good and evil: even the fable13 of Prometheus explains it better. Every hypothesis which only serves to assign a reason for certain things, without being, in addition to that recommendation, established upon indisputable principles, ought invariably to be rejected.
The Christian2 doctors — independently of revelation, which makes everything credible14 — explain the origin of good and evil no better than the partnergods of Zoroaster.
When they say God is a tender father, God is a just king; when they add the idea of infinity15 to that of love, that kindness, that justice which they observe in the best of their own species, they soon fall into the most palpable and dreadful contradictions. How could this sovereign, who possessed16 in infinite fulness the principle or quality of human justice, how could this father, entertaining an infinite affection for his children; how could this being, infinitely17 powerful, have formed creatures in His own likeness18, to have them immediately afterwards tempted19 by a malignant20 demon8, to make them yield to that temptation to inflict21 death on those whom He had created immortal22, and to overwhelm their posterity23 with calamities24 and crimes! We do not here speak of a contradiction still more revolting to our feeble reason. How could God, who ransomed25 the human race by the death of His only Son; or rather, how could God, who took upon Himself the nature of man, and died on the cross to save men from perdition, consign26 over to eternal tortures nearly the whole of that human race for whom He died? Certainly, when we consider this system merely as philosophers — without the aid of faith — we must consider it as absolutely monstrous28 and abominable29. It makes of God either pure and unmixed malice, and that malice infinite, which created thinking beings, on purpose to devote them to eternal misery30, or absolute impotence and imbecility, in not being able to foresee or to prevent the torments32 of his offspring.
But the eternity33 of misery is not the subject of this article, which relates properly only to the good and evil of the present life. None of the doctors of the numerous churches of Christianity, all of which advocate the doctrine34 we are here contesting, have been able to convince a single sage35.
We cannot conceive how Bayle, who managed the weapons of dialectics with such admirable strength and dexterity36, could content himself with introducing in a dispute a Manich?an, a Calvinist, a Molinist, and a Socinian. Why did he not introduce, as speaking, a reasonable and sensible man? Why did not Bayle speak in his own person? He would have said far better what we shall now venture to say ourselves.
A father who kills his children is a monster; a king who conducts his subjects into a snare37, in order to obtain a pretext38 for delivering them up to punishment and torture, is an execrable tyrant39. If you conceive God to possess the same kindness which you require in a father, the same justice that you require in a king, no possible resource exists by which, if we may use the expression, God can be exculpated40; and by allowing Him to possess infinite wisdom and infinite goodness you, in fact, render Him infinitely odious41; you excite a wish that He had no existence; you furnish arms to the atheist42, who will ever be justified43 in triumphantly44 remarking to you: Better by far is it to deny a God altogether, than impute45 to Him such conduct as you would punish, to the extremity46 of the law, in men.
We begin then with observing, that it is unbecoming in us to ascribe to God human attributes. It is not for us to make God after our own likeness. Human justice, human kindness, and human wisdom can never be applied47 or made suitable to Him. We may extend these attributes in our imagination as far as we are able, to infinity; they will never be other than human qualities with boundaries perpetually or indefinitely removed; it would be equally rational to attribute to Him infinite solidity, infinite motion, infinite roundness, or infinite divisibility. These attributes can never be His.
Philosophy informs us that this universe must have been arranged by a Being incomprehensible, eternal, and existing by His own nature; but, once again, we must observe that philosophy gives us no information on the subject of the attributes of that nature. We know what He is not, and not what He is.
With respect to God, there is neither good nor evil, physically48 or morally. What is physical or natural evil? Of all evils, the greatest, undoubtedly49, is death. Let us for a moment consider whether man could have been immortal.
In order that a body like ours should have been indissoluble, imperishable, it would have been necessary that it should not be composed of parts; that it should not be born; that it should have neither nourishment50 nor growth; that it should experience no change. Let any one examine each of these points; and let every reader extend their number according to his own suggestions, and it will be seen that the proposition of an immortal man is a contradiction.
If our organized body were immortal, that of mere27 animals would be so likewise; but it is evident that, in the course of a very short time, the whole globe would, in this case, be incompetent51 to supply nourishment to those animals; those immortal beings which exist only in consequence of renovation52 by food, would then perish for want of the means of such renovation. All this involves contradiction. We might make various other observations on the subject, but every reader who deserves the name of a philosopher will perceive that death was necessary to everything that is born; that death can neither be an error on the part of God, nor an evil, an injustice53, nor a chastisement54 to man.
Man, born to die, can no more be exempt55 from pain than from death. To prevent an organized substance endowed with feeling from ever experiencing pain, it would be necessary that all the laws of nature should be changed; that matter should no longer be divisible; that it should neither have weight, action, nor force; that a rock might fall on an animal without crushing it; and that water should have no power to suffocate56, or fire to burn it. Man, impassive, then, is as much a contradiction as man immortal.
This feeling of pain was indispensable to stimulate57 us to self-preservation, and to impart to us such pleasures as are consistent with those general laws by which the whole system of nature is bound and regulated.
If we never experienced pain, we should be every moment injuring ourselves without perceiving it. Without the excitement of uneasiness, without some sensation of pain, we should perform no function of life; should never communicate it, and should be destitute58 of all the pleasures of it. Hunger is the commencement of pain which compels us to take our required nourishment. Ennui59 is a pain which stimulates60 to exercise and occupation. Love itself is a necessity which becomes painful until it is met with corresponding attachment61. In a word, every desire is a want, a necessity, a beginning of pain. Pain, therefore, is the mainspring of all the actions of animated62 beings. Every animal possessed of feeling must be liable to pain, if matter is divisible; and pain was as necessary as death. It is not, therefore, an error of Providence63, nor a result of malignity64, nor a creature of imagination. Had we seen only brutes65 suffer, we should, for that, never have accused nature of harshness or cruelty; had we, while ourselves were impassive, witnessed the lingering and torturing death of a dove, when a kite seized upon it with his murderous talons66, and leisurely67 devouring69 its bleeding limbs, doing in that no more than we do ourselves, we should not express the slightest murmur70 of dissatisfaction. But what claim have we for an exemption71 of our own bodies from such dismemberment and torture beyond what might be urged in behalf of brutes? Is it that we possess an intellect superior to theirs? But what has intellect to do with the divisibility of matter? Can a few ideas more or less in a brain prevent fire from burning, or a rock from crushing us?
Moral evil, upon which so many volumes have been written is, in fact, nothing but natural evil. This moral evil is a sensation of pain occasioned by one organized being to another. Rapine, outrage72, etc., are evil only because they produce evil. But as we certainly are unable to do any evil, or occasion any pain to God, it is evident by the light of reason — for faith is altogether a different principle — that in relation to the Supreme Being and as affecting Him, moral evil can have no existence.
As the greatest of natural evils is death, the greatest of moral evils is, unquestionably, war. All crimes follow in its train; false and calumnious73 declarations, perfidious74 violation75 of the treaties, pillage76, devastation77, pain, and death under every hideous78 and appalling79 form.
All this is physical evil in relation to man, but can no more be considered moral evil in relation to God than the rage of dogs worrying and destroying one another. It is a mere commonplace idea, and as false as it is feeble, that men are the only species that slaughter80 and destroy one another. Wolves, dogs, cats, cocks, quails81, all war with their respective species: house spiders devour68 one another; the male universally fights for the female. This warfare82 is the result of the laws of nature, of principles in their very blood and essence; all is connected; all is necessary.
Nature has granted man about two and twenty years of life, one with another; that is, of a thousand children born in the same month, some of whom have died in their infancy83, and the rest lived respectively to the age of thirty, forty, fifty, and even eighty years, or perhaps beyond, the average calculation will allow to each the above-mentioned number of twenty-two years.
How can it affect the Deity84, whether a man die in battle or of a fever? War destroys fewer human beings than smallpox85. The scourge86 of war is transient, that of smallpox reigns87 with paramount88 and permanent fatality89 throughout the earth, followed by a numerous train of others; and taking into consideration the combined, and nearly regular operation of the various causes which sweep mankind from the stage of life, the allowance of two and twenty years for every individual will be found in general to be tolerably correct.
Man, you say, offends God by killing90 his neighbor; if this be the case, the directors of nations must indeed be tremendous criminals; for, while even invoking91 God to their assistance, they urge on to slaughter immense multitudes of their fellow-beings, for contemptible92 interests which it would show infinitely more policy, as well as humanity, to abandon. But how — to reason merely as philosophers — how do they offend God? Just as much as tigers and crocodiles offend him. It is, surely, not God whom they harass93 and torment31, but their neighbor. It is only against man that man can be guilty. A highway robber can commit no robbery on God. What can it signify to the eternal Deity, whether a few pieces of yellow metal are in the hands of Jerome, or of Bonaventure? We have necessary desires, necessary passions, and necessary laws for the restraint of both; and while on this our ant-hill, during the little day of our existence, we are engaged in eager and destructive contest about a straw, the universe moves on in its majestic94 course, directed by eternal and unalterable laws, which comprehend in their operation the atom that we call the earth.
点击
收听单词发音
收听单词发音 |
1
vessels
|
|
| n.血管( vessel的名词复数 )；船；容器；（具有特殊品质或接受特殊品质的）人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
Christian
|
|
| adj.基督教徒的；n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
Christians
|
|
| n.基督教徒( Christian的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
perfectly
|
|
| adv.完美地，无可非议地，彻底地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
antiquity
|
|
| n.古老；高龄；古物，古迹 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
susceptible
|
|
| adj.过敏的，敏感的；易动感情的，易受感动的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
rigid
|
|
| adj.严格的，死板的；刚硬的，僵硬的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
demon
|
|
| n.魔鬼，恶魔 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
demonstrations
|
|
| 证明( demonstration的名词复数 )； 表明； 表达； 游行示威 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
adoption
|
|
| n.采用，采纳，通过；收养 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
supreme
|
|
| adj.极度的，最重要的；至高的，最高的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
malice
|
|
| n.恶意，怨恨，蓄意；[律]预谋 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
fable
|
|
| n.寓言；童话；神话 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
credible
|
|
| adj.可信任的，可靠的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
infinity
|
|
| n.无限，无穷，大量 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
possessed
|
|
| adj.疯狂的；拥有的，占有的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
infinitely
|
|
| adv.无限地，无穷地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
18
likeness
|
|
| n.相像，相似（之处） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
19
tempted
|
|
| v.怂恿（某人）干不正当的事；冒…的险（tempt的过去分词） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
20
malignant
|
|
| adj.恶性的，致命的；恶意的，恶毒的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
21
inflict
|
|
| vt.(on)把…强加给，使遭受，使承担 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
22
immortal
|
|
| adj.不朽的；永生的，不死的；神的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
23
posterity
|
|
| n.后裔，子孙，后代 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
24
calamities
|
|
| n.灾祸，灾难( calamity的名词复数 )；不幸之事 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
25
ransomed
|
|
| 付赎金救人，赎金( ransom的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
26
consign
|
|
| vt.寄售（货品），托运，交托，委托 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
27
mere
|
|
| adj.纯粹的；仅仅，只不过 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
28
monstrous
|
|
| adj.巨大的；恐怖的；可耻的，丢脸的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
29
abominable
|
|
| adj.可厌的，令人憎恶的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
30
misery
|
|
| n.痛苦，苦恼，苦难；悲惨的境遇，贫苦 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
31
torment
|
|
| n.折磨；令人痛苦的东西(人)；vt.折磨；纠缠 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
32
torments
|
|
| （肉体或精神上的）折磨，痛苦( torment的名词复数 )； 造成痛苦的事物[人] | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
33
eternity
|
|
| n.不朽，来世；永恒，无穷 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
34
doctrine
|
|
| n.教义；主义；学说 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
35
sage
|
|
| n.圣人，哲人；adj.贤明的，明智的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
36
dexterity
|
|
| n.(手的)灵巧，灵活 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
37
snare
|
|
| n.陷阱，诱惑，圈套；（去除息肉或者肿瘤的）勒除器；响弦，小军鼓；vt.以陷阱捕获，诱惑 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
38
pretext
|
|
| n.借口，托词 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
39
tyrant
|
|
| n.暴君，专制的君主，残暴的人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
40
exculpated
|
|
| v.开脱，使无罪( exculpate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
41
odious
|
|
| adj.可憎的，讨厌的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
42
atheist
|
|
| n.无神论者 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
43
justified
|
|
| a.正当的，有理的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
44
triumphantly
|
|
| ad.得意洋洋地；得胜地；成功地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
45
impute
|
|
| v.归咎于 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
46
extremity
|
|
| n.末端，尽头；尽力；终极；极度 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
47
applied
|
|
| adj.应用的；v.应用，适用 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
48
physically
|
|
| adj.物质上，体格上，身体上，按自然规律 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
49
undoubtedly
|
|
| adv.确实地，无疑地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
50
nourishment
|
|
| n.食物，营养品；营养情况 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
51
incompetent
|
|
| adj.无能力的，不能胜任的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
52
renovation
|
|
| n.革新，整修 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
53
injustice
|
|
| n.非正义，不公正，不公平，侵犯（别人的）权利 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
54
chastisement
|
|
| n.惩罚 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
55
exempt
|
|
| adj.免除的；v.使免除；n.免税者，被免除义务者 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
56
suffocate
|
|
| vt.使窒息，使缺氧，阻碍；vi.窒息，窒息而亡，阻碍发展 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
57
stimulate
|
|
| vt.刺激，使兴奋；激励，使…振奋 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
58
destitute
|
|
| adj.缺乏的；穷困的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
59
ennui
|
|
| n.怠倦，无聊 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
60
stimulates
|
|
| v.刺激( stimulate的第三人称单数 )；激励；使兴奋；起兴奋作用，起刺激作用，起促进作用 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
61
attachment
|
|
| n.附属物，附件；依恋；依附 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
62
animated
|
|
| adj.生气勃勃的，活跃的，愉快的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
63
providence
|
|
| n.深谋远虑，天道，天意；远见；节约；上帝 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
64
malignity
|
|
| n.极度的恶意，恶毒；（病的）恶性 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
65
brutes
|
|
| 兽( brute的名词复数 )； 畜生； 残酷无情的人； 兽性 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
66
talons
|
|
| n.（尤指猛禽的）爪( talon的名词复数 )；（如爪般的）手指；爪状物；锁簧尖状突出部 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
67
leisurely
|
|
| adj.悠闲的；从容的，慢慢的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
68
devour
|
|
| v.吞没；贪婪地注视或谛听，贪读；使着迷 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
69
devouring
|
|
| 吞没( devour的现在分词 )； 耗尽； 津津有味地看； 狼吞虎咽地吃光 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
70
murmur
|
|
| n.低语，低声的怨言；v.低语，低声而言 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
71
exemption
|
|
| n.豁免，免税额，免除 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
72
outrage
|
|
| n.暴行，侮辱，愤怒；vt.凌辱，激怒 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
73
calumnious
|
|
| adj.毁谤的，中伤的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
74
perfidious
|
|
| adj.不忠的，背信弃义的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
75
violation
|
|
| n.违反(行为)，违背(行为)，侵犯 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
76
pillage
|
|
| v.抢劫；掠夺；n.抢劫，掠夺；掠夺物 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
77
devastation
|
|
| n.毁坏；荒废；极度震惊或悲伤 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
78
hideous
|
|
| adj.丑陋的，可憎的，可怕的，恐怖的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
79
appalling
|
|
| adj.骇人听闻的，令人震惊的，可怕的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
80
slaughter
|
|
| n.屠杀，屠宰；vt.屠杀，宰杀 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
81
quails
|
|
| 鹌鹑( quail的名词复数 )； 鹌鹑肉 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
82
warfare
|
|
| n.战争(状态)；斗争；冲突 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
83
infancy
|
|
| n.婴儿期；幼年期；初期 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
84
deity
|
|
| n.神，神性；被奉若神明的人(或物) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
85
smallpox
|
|
| n.天花 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
86
scourge
|
|
| n.灾难，祸害；v.蹂躏 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
87
reigns
|
|
| n.君主的统治( reign的名词复数 )；君主统治时期；任期；当政期 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
88
paramount
|
|
| a.最重要的，最高权力的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
89
fatality
|
|
| n.不幸，灾祸，天命 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
90
killing
|
|
| n.巨额利润；突然赚大钱，发大财 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
91
invoking
|
|
| v.援引( invoke的现在分词 )；行使（权利等）；祈求救助；恳求 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
92
contemptible
|
|
| adj.可鄙的，可轻视的，卑劣的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
93
harass
|
|
| vt.使烦恼，折磨，骚扰 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
94
majestic
|
|
| adj.雄伟的，壮丽的，庄严的，威严的，崇高的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
| 欢迎访问英文小说网 |