These vampires were corpses5, who went out of their graves at night to suck the blood of the living, either at their throats or stomachs, after which they returned to their cemeteries6. The persons so sucked waned7, grew pale, and fell into consumption; while the sucking corpses grew fat, got rosy8, and enjoyed an excellent appetite. It was in Poland, Hungary, Silesia, Moravia, Austria, and Lorraine, that the dead made this good cheer. We never heard a word of vampires in London, nor even at Paris. I confess that in both these cities there were stock-jobbers, brokers9, and men of business, who sucked the blood of the people in broad daylight; but they were not dead, though corrupted11. These true suckers lived not in cemeteries, but in very agreeable palaces.
Who would believe that we derive12 the idea of vampires from Greece? Not from the Greece of Alexander, Aristotle, Plato, Epicurus, and Demosthenes; but from Christian13 Greece, unfortunately schismatic. For a long time Christians14 of the Greek rite15 have imagined that the bodies of Christians of the Latin church, buried in Greece, do not decay, because they are excommunicated. This is precisely16 the contrary to that of us Christians of the Latin church, who believe that corpses which do not corrupt10 are marked with the seal of eternal beatitude. So much so, indeed, that when we have paid a hundred thousand crowns to Rome, to give them a saint’s brevet, we adore them with the worship of “dulia.”
The Greeks are persuaded that these dead are sorcerers; they call them “broucolacas,” or “vroucolacas,” according as they pronounce the second letter of the alphabet. The Greek corpses go into houses to suck the blood of little children, to eat the supper of the fathers and mothers, drink their wine, and break all the furniture. They can only be put to rights by burning them when they are caught. But the precaution must be taken of not putting them into the fire until after their hearts are torn out, which must be burned separately. The celebrated17 Tournefort, sent into the Levant by Louis XIV., as well as so many other virtuosi, was witness of all the acts attributed to one of these “broucolacas,” and to this ceremony.
After slander18, nothing is communicated more promptly19 than superstition20, fanaticism21, sorcery, and tales of those raised from the dead. There were “broucolacas” in Wallachia, Moldavia, and some among the Polanders, who are of the Romish church. This superstition being absent, they acquired it, and it went through all the east of Germany. Nothing was spoken of but vampires, from 1730 to 1735; they were laid in wait for, their hearts torn out and burned. They resembled the ancient martyrs23 — the more they were burned, the more they abounded24.
Finally, Calmet became their historian, and treated vampires as he treated the Old and New Testaments26, by relating faithfully all that has been said before him.
The most curious things, in my opinion, were the verbal suits juridically conducted, concerning the dead who went from their tombs to suck the little boys and girls of their neighborhood. Calmet relates that in Hungary two officers, delegated by the emperor Charles VI., assisted by the bailiff of the place and an executioner, held an inquest on a vampire2, who had been dead six weeks, and who had sucked all the neighborhood. They found him in his coffin27, fresh and jolly, with his eyes open, and asking for food. The bailiff passed his sentence; the executioner tore out the vampire’s heart, and burned it, after which he feasted no more.
Who, after this, dares to doubt of the resuscitated28 dead, with which our ancient legends are filled, and of all the miracles related by Bollandus, and the sincere and revered29 Dom Ruinart? You will find stories of vampires in the “Jewish Letters” of d’Argens, whom the Jesuit authors of the “Journal of Trévoux” have accused of believing nothing. It should be observed how they triumph in the history of the vampire of Hungary; how they thanked God and the Virgin30 for having at last converted this poor d’Argens, the chamberlain of a king who did not believe in vampires. “Behold,” said they, “this famous unbeliever, who dared to throw doubts on the appearance of the angel to the Holy Virgin; on the star which conducted the magi; on the cure of the possessed31; on the immersion32 of two thousand swine in a lake; on an eclipse of the sun at the full moon; on the resurrection of the dead who walked in Jerusalem — his heart is softened33, his mind is enlightened; he believes in vampires.”
There no longer remained any question, but to examine whether all these dead were raised by their own virtue34, by the power of God, or by that of the devil. Several great theologians of Lorraine, of Moravia, and Hungary, displayed their opinions and their science. They related all that St. Augustine, St. Ambrose, and so many other saints, had most unintelligibly35 said on the living and the dead. They related all the miracles of St. Stephen, which are found in the seventh book of the works of St. Augustine. This is one of the most curious of them: In the city of Aubzal in Africa, a young man was crushed to death by the ruins of a wall; the widow immediately invoked36 St. Stephen, to whom she was very much devoted37. St. Stephen raised him. He was asked what he had seen in the other world. “Sirs,” said he, “when my soul quitted my body, it met an infinity38 of souls, who asked it more questions about this world than you do of the other. I went I know not whither, when I met St. Stephen, who said to me, ‘Give back that which thou hast received.’ I answered, ‘What should I give back? you have given me nothing.’ He repeated three times, ‘Give back that which thou hast received.’ Then I comprehended that he spoke22 of the credo; I repeated my credo to him, and suddenly he raised me.” Above all, they quoted the stories related by Sulpicius Severus, in the life of St. Martin. They proved that St. Martin, with some others, raised up a condemned39 soul.
But all these stories, however true they might be, had nothing in common with the vampires who rose to suck the blood of their neighbors, and afterwards replaced themselves in their coffins40. They looked if they could not find in the Old Testament25, or in the mythology41, some vampire whom they could quote as an example; but they found none. It was proved, however, that the dead drank and ate, since in so many ancient nations food was placed on their tombs.
The difficulty was to know whether it was the soul or the body of the dead which ate. It was decided42 that it was both. Delicate and unsubstantial things, as sweetmeats, whipped cream, and melting fruits, were for the soul, and roast beef and the like were for the body.
The kings of Persia were, said they, the first who caused themselves to be served with viands43 after their death. Almost all the kings of the present day imitate them; but they are the monks44 who eat their dinner and supper, and drink their wine. Thus, properly speaking, kings are not vampires; the true vampires are the monks, who eat at the expense of both kings and people.
It is very true that St. Stanislaus, who had bought a considerable estate from a Polish gentleman, and not paid him for it, being brought before King Boleslaus by his heirs, raised up the gentleman; but this was solely45 to get quittance. It is not said that he gave a single glass of wine to the seller, who returned to the other world without having eaten or drunk. They afterwards treated of the grand question, whether a vampire could be absolved46 who died excommunicated, which comes more to the point.
I am not profound enough in theology to give my opinion on this subject; but I would willingly be for absolution, because in all doubtful affairs we should take the mildest part. “Odia restringenda, favores ampliandi.”
The result of all this is that a great part of Europe has been infested47 with vampires for five or six years, and that there are now no more; that we have had Convulsionaries in France for twenty years, and that we have them no longer; that we have had demoniacs for seventeen hundred years, but have them no longer; that the dead have been raised ever since the days of Hippolytus, but that they are raised no longer; and, lastly, that we have had Jesuits in Spain, Portugal, France, and the two Sicilies, but that we have them no longer.
点击收听单词发音
1 vampires | |
n.吸血鬼( vampire的名词复数 );吸血蝠;高利贷者;(舞台上的)活板门 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 vampire | |
n.吸血鬼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 reigns | |
n.君主的统治( reign的名词复数 );君主统治时期;任期;当政期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 approbation | |
n.称赞;认可 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 corpses | |
n.死尸,尸体( corpse的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 cemeteries | |
n.(非教堂的)墓地,公墓( cemetery的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 waned | |
v.衰落( wane的过去式和过去分词 );(月)亏;变小;变暗淡 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 rosy | |
adj.美好的,乐观的,玫瑰色的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 brokers | |
n.(股票、外币等)经纪人( broker的名词复数 );中间人;代理商;(订合同的)中人v.做掮客(或中人等)( broker的第三人称单数 );作为权力经纪人进行谈判;以中间人等身份安排… | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 corrupt | |
v.贿赂,收买;adj.腐败的,贪污的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 corrupted | |
(使)败坏( corrupt的过去式和过去分词 ); (使)腐化; 引起(计算机文件等的)错误; 破坏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 derive | |
v.取得;导出;引申;来自;源自;出自 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 Christians | |
n.基督教徒( Christian的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 rite | |
n.典礼,惯例,习俗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 precisely | |
adv.恰好,正好,精确地,细致地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 celebrated | |
adj.有名的,声誉卓著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 slander | |
n./v.诽谤,污蔑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 promptly | |
adv.及时地,敏捷地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 superstition | |
n.迷信,迷信行为 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 fanaticism | |
n.狂热,盲信 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 martyrs | |
n.martyr的复数形式;烈士( martyr的名词复数 );殉道者;殉教者;乞怜者(向人诉苦以博取同情) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 abounded | |
v.大量存在,充满,富于( abound的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 testament | |
n.遗嘱;证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 testaments | |
n.遗嘱( testament的名词复数 );实际的证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 coffin | |
n.棺材,灵柩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 resuscitated | |
v.使(某人或某物)恢复知觉,苏醒( resuscitate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 revered | |
v.崇敬,尊崇,敬畏( revere的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 virgin | |
n.处女,未婚女子;adj.未经使用的;未经开发的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 immersion | |
n.沉浸;专心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 softened | |
(使)变软( soften的过去式和过去分词 ); 缓解打击; 缓和; 安慰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 virtue | |
n.德行,美德;贞操;优点;功效,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 unintelligibly | |
难以理解地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 invoked | |
v.援引( invoke的过去式和过去分词 );行使(权利等);祈求救助;恳求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 devoted | |
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 infinity | |
n.无限,无穷,大量 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 condemned | |
adj. 被责难的, 被宣告有罪的 动词condemn的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 coffins | |
n.棺材( coffin的名词复数 );使某人早亡[死,完蛋,垮台等]之物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 mythology | |
n.神话,神话学,神话集 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 viands | |
n.食品,食物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 monks | |
n.修道士,僧侣( monk的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 solely | |
adv.仅仅,唯一地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 absolved | |
宣告…无罪,赦免…的罪行,宽恕…的罪行( absolve的过去式和过去分词 ); 不受责难,免除责任 [义务] ,开脱(罪责) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 infested | |
adj.为患的,大批滋生的(常与with搭配)v.害虫、野兽大批出没于( infest的过去式和过去分词 );遍布于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |