Political economists2 generally, and English political economists above others, have been accustomed to lay almost exclusive stress upon the first of these agencies; to exaggerate the effect of competition, and to take into little account the other and conflicting principle. They are apt to express themselves as if they thought that competition actually does, in all cases, whatever it can be shown to he the tendency of competition to do. This is partly intelligible4, if we consider that only through the principle of competition has political economy any pretension5 to the character of a science.So far as rents, profits, wages, prices, are determined6 by competition, laws may be assigned for them. Assume competition to be their exclusive regulator, and principles of broad generality and scientific precision may be laid down, according to which they will be regulated. The political economist3 justly deems this his proper business: and as an abstract or hypothetical science, political economy cannot be required to do, and indeed cannot do, anything more. But it would be a great misconception of the actual course of human affairs, to suppose that competition exercises in fact this unlimited7 sway. I am not speaking of monopolies, either natural or artificial, or of any interferences of authority with the liberty of production or exchange. Such disturbing causes have always been allowed for by political economists. I speak of cases in which there is nothing to restrain competition; no hindrance8 to it either in the nature of the case or in artificial obstacles; yet in which the result is not determined by competition, but by custom or usage; competition either not taking place at all, or producing its effect in quite a different manner from that which is ordinarily assumed to be natural to it.
§2. Competition, in fact, has only become in any considerable degree the governing principle of contracts, at a comparatively modern period. The farther we look back into history, the more we see all transactions and engagements under the influence of fixed9 customs. The reason is evident. Custom is the most powerful protector of the weak the strong; their sole protector where there are no laws or government adequate to the purpose. Custom is a barrier which, even in the most oppressed condition of mankind, tyranny is forced in some degree to respect. To the industrious10 population, in a turbulent military community, freedom of competition is a vain phrase; they are never in a condition to make terms for themselves by it: there is always a master who throws his sword into the scale, and the terms are such as he imposes. But though the law of the strongest decides, it is not the interest nor in general the practice of the strongest to strain that law to the utmost, and every relaxation11 of it has a tendency to become a custom, and every custom to become a right. Rights thus originating, and not competition in any shape, determine, in a rude state of society, the share of the produce enjoyed by those who produce it. The relations, more especially, between the landowner and the cultivator, and the payments made by the latter to the former, are, in all states of society but the most modern, determined by the usage of the country. Never until late times have a right to retain his holdings, while he fulfils the customary requirements; and thus become, in a certain sense, a co-proprietor of the soil. Even where the holder12 has not acquired this fixity of tenure13, the terms of occupation have often been fixed and invariable.
In India, for example, and other Asiatic communities similarly constituted, the ryots, or peasant-farmers, are not regarded as tenants15 at will, nor even as tenants by virtue16 of a lease. In most villages there are indeed some ryots on this precarious17 footing, consisting of those, or the descendants of those, who have settled in the place at a known and comparatively recent period; but all who are looked upon as descendants or representatives of the original inhabitants, and even many mere18 tenants of ancient date, are thought entitled to retain their land, as long as they pay the customary rents. What these customary rents are, or ought to be, has indeed, in most cases, become a matter of obscurity; usurpation19, tyranny, and foreign conquest having to a great degree obliterated20 the evidences of them. But when an old and purely21 Hindoo principality falls under the dominion22 of the British Government, or the management of its officers, and when the details of the revenue system come to be inquired into, it is usually found that though the demands of the great landholder, the State, have been swelled23 by fiscal24 rapacity25 until all limit is practically lost sight of, it has yet been thought necessary to have a distinct name and a separate pretext26 for each increase of exaction27; so that the demand has sometimes come to consist of thirty or forty different items, in addition to the nominal28 rent. This circuitous29 mode of increasing the payments assuredly would not have been resorted to, if there had been an acknowledged right in the landlord to increase the rent. Its adoption30 is a proof that there was once an effective limitation, a real customary rent; and that the understood right of the ryot to the land, so long as he paid rent according to custom, was at some time or other more than nominal.1 The British Government of India always simplifies the tenure by consolidating31 the various assessments32 into one, thus making the rent nominally33 as well as really an arbitrary thing, or at least a matter of specific agreement: but it scrupulously34 respects the right of the ryot to the land, though until the reforms of the present generation (reforms even now only partially35 carried into effect) it seldom left him much more than a bare subsistence.
In modern Europe the cultivators have gradually emerged from a state of personal slavery. The barbarian36 conquerors37 of the Western Empire found that the easiest mode of managing their conquests would be to leave the occupation of the land in the hands in which they found it, and to save themselves a labour so uncongenial as the superintendence of troops of slaves, by allowing the slaves to retain in a certain degree the control of their own actions, under an obligation to furnish the lord with provisions and labour. A common expedient38 was to assign to the serf, for his exclusive use, as much land as was thought sufficient for his support, and to make him work on the other lands of his lord whenever required. By degrees these indefinite obligations were transformed into a definite one, of supplying a fixed quantity of provisions or a fixed quantity of labour: and as the lords, in time, became inclined to employ their income in the purchase of luxuries rather than in the maintenance of retainers, the payments in kind were commuted39 for payments in money. Each concession40, at first voluntary and revocable at pleasure, gradually acquired the force of custom, and was at last recognised and enforced by the tribunals. In this manner the serfs progressively rose into a free tenantry, who held their land in perpetuity on fixed conditions. The conditions were sometimes very onerous41, and the people very miserable42. But their obligations were determined by the usage or law of the country, and not by competition.
Where the cultivators had never been, strictly43 speaking, in personal bondage44, or after they had ceased to be so, the exigencies45 of a poor and little advanced society gave rise to another arrangement, which in some parts of Europe, even highly improved parts, has been found sufficiently46 advantageous47 to be continued to the present day. I speak of the métayer system. Under this, the land is divided, in small farms, among single families, the landlord generally supplying the stock which the agricultural system of the country is considered to require, and receiving, in lieu of rent and profit, a fixed proportion of the produce. This proportion, which is generally paid in kind, is usually, (as is implied in the words métayer, mezzaiuolo, and medietarius,) one-half. There are places, however, such as the rich volcanic48 soil of the province of Naples, where the landlord takes two-thirds, and yet the cultivator by means of an excellent agriculture contrives49 to live. But whether the proportion is two-thirds or one-half, it is a fixed proportion; not variable from farm to farm, or from tenant14 to tenant. The custom of the country is the universal rule; nobody thinks of raising or lowering rents, or of letting land on other than the customary conditions. Competition, as a regulator of rent, has no existence.
§3. Prices, whenever there was no monopoly, came earlier under the influence of competition, and are much more universally subject to it, than rents: but that influence is by no means, even in the present activity of mercantile competition, so absolute as is sometimes assumed. There is no proposition which meets us in the field of political economy oftener than this-that there cannot be two prices in the same market. Such undoubtedly50 is the natural effect of unimpeded competition; yet every one knows that there are, almost always, two prices in the same market. Not only are there in every large town, and in almost every trade, cheap shops and dear shops, but the same shop often sells the same article at different prices to different customers: and, as a general rule, each retailer51 adapts his scale of prices to the class of customers whom he expects. The wholesale53 trade, in the great articles of commerce, is really under the dominion of competition. There, the buyers as well as sellers are traders or manufacturers, and their purchases are not influenced by indolence or vulgar finery, nor depend on the smaller motives54 of personal convenience, but are business transactions. In the wholesale markets therefore it is true as a general proposition, that there are not two prices at one time for the same thing: there is at each time and place a market price, which can be quoted in a price-current. But retail52 price, the price paid by the actual consumer, seems to feel very slowly and imperfectly the effect of competition; and when competition does exist, it often, instead of lowering prices, merely divides the gains of the high price among a greater number of dealers55. Hence it is that, of the price paid by the consumer, so large a proportion is absorbed by the gains of retailers56; and any one who inquires into the amount which reaches the hands of those who made the things he buys, will often be astonished at its smallness. When indeed the market, being that of a great city, holds out a sufficient inducement to large capitalists to engage in retail operations, it is generally found a better speculation57 to attract a large business by underselling others, than merely to divide the field of employment with them. This influence of competition is making itself felt more and more through the principal branches of retail trade in the large towns; and the rapidity and cheapness of transport, by making consumers less dependent on the dealers in their immediate58 neighbourhood, are tending to assimilate more and more the whole country to a large town: but hitherto it is only in the great centres of business that retail transactions have been chiefly, or even much, determined, by competition. Elsewhere it rather acts, when it acts at all, as an occasional disturbing influence; the habitual59 regulator is custom, modified from time to time by notions existing in the minds of purchasers and sellers, of some kind of equity60 or justice.
In many trades the terms on which business is done are a matter of positive arrangement among the trade, who use the means they always possess of making the situation of any member of the body who departs from its fixed customs, inconvenient61 or disagreeable. It is well known that the bookselling trade was, until lately, one of these, and that notwithstanding the active spirit of rivalry62 in the trade, competition did not produce its natural effect in breaking down the trade rules. All professional remuneration is regulated by custom. The fees of physicians, surgeons, and barristers, the charges of attorneys, are nearly invariable. Not certainly for want of abundant competition in those professions, but because the competition operates by diminishing each competitor’s chance of fees, not by lowering the fees themselves.
Since custom stands its ground against competition to so considerable an extent, even where, from the multitude of competitors and the general energy in the pursuit of gain, the spirit of competition is strongest, we may be sure that this is much more the case where people are content with smaller gains, and estimate their pecuniary63 interest at a lower rate when balanced against their ease or their pleasure. I believe it will often be found, in Continental64 Europe, that prices and charges, of some or of all sorts, are much higher in some places than in others not far distant, without its being possible to assign any other cause than that it has always been so: the customers are used to it, and acquiesce65 in it. An enterprising competitor, with sufficient capital, might force down the charges, and make his fortune during the process; but there are no enterprising competitors; those who have capital prefer to leave it where it is, or to make less profit by it in a more quiet way.
These observations must be received as a general correction to be applied66 whenever relevant, whether expressly mentioned or not, to the conclusions contained in the subsequent portions of this treatise67. Our reasonings must, in general, proceed as if the known and natural effects of competition were actually produced by it, in all cases in which it is not restrained by some positive obstacle. Where competition, though free to exist, does not exist, or where it exists, but has its natural consequences overruled by any other agency, the conclusions will fail more or less of being applicable. To escape error, we ought, in applying the conclusions of political economy to the actual affairs of life, to consider not only what will happen supposing the maximum of competition, but how far the result will be affected68 if competition falls short of the maximum.
The states of economical relation which stand first in order to be discussed and appreciated, are those in which competition has no part, the arbiter69 of transactions being either brute70 force or established usage. These will be the subject of the next four chapters.
点击收听单词发音
1 ascertain | |
vt.发现,确定,查明,弄清 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 economists | |
n.经济学家,经济专家( economist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 economist | |
n.经济学家,经济专家,节俭的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 intelligible | |
adj.可理解的,明白易懂的,清楚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 pretension | |
n.要求;自命,自称;自负 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 unlimited | |
adj.无限的,不受控制的,无条件的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 hindrance | |
n.妨碍,障碍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 industrious | |
adj.勤劳的,刻苦的,奋发的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 relaxation | |
n.松弛,放松;休息;消遣;娱乐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 holder | |
n.持有者,占有者;(台,架等)支持物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 tenure | |
n.终身职位;任期;(土地)保有权,保有期 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 tenant | |
n.承租人;房客;佃户;v.租借,租用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 tenants | |
n.房客( tenant的名词复数 );佃户;占用者;占有者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 virtue | |
n.德行,美德;贞操;优点;功效,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 precarious | |
adj.不安定的,靠不住的;根据不足的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 usurpation | |
n.篡位;霸占 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 obliterated | |
v.除去( obliterate的过去式和过去分词 );涂去;擦掉;彻底破坏或毁灭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 purely | |
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 dominion | |
n.统治,管辖,支配权;领土,版图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 swelled | |
增强( swell的过去式和过去分词 ); 肿胀; (使)凸出; 充满(激情) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 fiscal | |
adj.财政的,会计的,国库的,国库岁入的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 rapacity | |
n.贪婪,贪心,劫掠的欲望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 pretext | |
n.借口,托词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 exaction | |
n.强求,强征;杂税 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 nominal | |
adj.名义上的;(金额、租金)微不足道的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 circuitous | |
adj.迂回的路的,迂曲的,绕行的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 adoption | |
n.采用,采纳,通过;收养 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 consolidating | |
v.(使)巩固, (使)加强( consolidate的现在分词 );(使)合并 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 assessments | |
n.评估( assessment的名词复数 );评价;(应偿付金额的)估定;(为征税对财产所作的)估价 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 nominally | |
在名义上,表面地; 应名儿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 scrupulously | |
adv.一丝不苟地;小心翼翼地,多顾虑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 partially | |
adv.部分地,从某些方面讲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 barbarian | |
n.野蛮人;adj.野蛮(人)的;未开化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 conquerors | |
征服者,占领者( conqueror的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 expedient | |
adj.有用的,有利的;n.紧急的办法,权宜之计 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 commuted | |
通勤( commute的过去式和过去分词 ); 减(刑); 代偿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 concession | |
n.让步,妥协;特许(权) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 onerous | |
adj.繁重的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 miserable | |
adj.悲惨的,痛苦的;可怜的,糟糕的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 strictly | |
adv.严厉地,严格地;严密地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 bondage | |
n.奴役,束缚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 exigencies | |
n.急切需要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 sufficiently | |
adv.足够地,充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 advantageous | |
adj.有利的;有帮助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 volcanic | |
adj.火山的;象火山的;由火山引起的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 contrives | |
(不顾困难地)促成某事( contrive的第三人称单数 ); 巧妙地策划,精巧地制造(如机器); 设法做到 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 undoubtedly | |
adv.确实地,无疑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 retailer | |
n.零售商(人) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 retail | |
v./n.零售;adv.以零售价格 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 wholesale | |
n.批发;adv.以批发方式;vt.批发,成批出售 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 motives | |
n.动机,目的( motive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 dealers | |
n.商人( dealer的名词复数 );贩毒者;毒品贩子;发牌者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 retailers | |
零售商,零售店( retailer的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 speculation | |
n.思索,沉思;猜测;投机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 habitual | |
adj.习惯性的;通常的,惯常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 equity | |
n.公正,公平,(无固定利息的)股票 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 inconvenient | |
adj.不方便的,令人感到麻烦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 rivalry | |
n.竞争,竞赛,对抗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 pecuniary | |
adj.金钱的;金钱上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 continental | |
adj.大陆的,大陆性的,欧洲大陆的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 acquiesce | |
vi.默许,顺从,同意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 applied | |
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 treatise | |
n.专著;(专题)论文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 arbiter | |
n.仲裁人,公断人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 brute | |
n.野兽,兽性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |