(March, 1824.)
I do not remember that any public event of our own times has touched me so nearly, or so much with the feelings belonging to a private affliction, as the death of Mr. Ricardo. To me in some sense it was a private affliction—and no doubt to all others who knew and honoured his extraordinary talents. For great intellectual merit, wherever it has been steadily2 contemplated3, cannot but conciliate some personal regard: and for my own part I acknowledge that, abstracting altogether from the use to which a man of splendid endowments may apply them—or even supposing the case that he should deliberately4 apply them to a bad one, I could no more on that account withhold5 my good wishes and affection from his person—than, under any consideration of their terrific attributes, I could forbear to admire the power and the beauty of the serpent or the panther. Simply on its own account, and without further question, a great intellect challenges, as of right, not merely an interest of admiration—in common with all other exhibitions of power and magnificence—but also an interest of human love, and (where that is necessary) a spirit of tenderness to its aberrations7. Mr. Ricardo however stood in no need of a partial or indulgent privilege: his privilege of intellect had a comprehensive sanction from all the purposes to which he applied8 it in the course of his public life: in or out of parliament, as a senator—or as an author, he was known and honoured as a public benefactor9. Though connected myself by private friendship with persons of the political party hostile to his, I heard amongst them all but one language of respect for his public conduct. Those, who stood neutral to all parties, remarked that Mr. Ricardo’s voice—though heard too seldom for the wishes of the enlightened part of the nation—was never raised with emphasis upon any question lying out of the province in which he reigned10 as the paramount11 authority, except upon such as seemed to affect some great interest of liberty or religious toleration. And, wherever a discussion arose which transcended12 the level of temporary and local politics (as that for example upon corporal punishments), the weight of authority—which mere6 blank ability had obtained for him in the House of Commons—was sure to be thrown into that view of the case which upheld the dignity of human nature. Participating most cordially in these feelings of reverence13 for Mr. Ricardo’s political character, I had besides a sorrow not unmixed with self-reproach arising out of some considerations more immediately relating to myself. In August and September 1821 I wrote The Confessions14 of an English Opium-Eater: and in the course of this little work I took occasion to express my obligations, as a student of Political Economy, to Mr. Ricardo’s ‘Principles’ of that science. For this as for some other passages I was justly2 attacked by an able and liberal critic in the New Edinburgh Review—as for so many absurd irrelevancies: in that situation no doubt they were so; and of this, in spite of the haste in which I had written the greater part of the book, I was fully15 aware. However, as they said no more than was true, I was glad to take that or any occasion which I could invent for offering my public testimony16 of gratitude17 to Mr. Ricardo. The truth is—I thought that something might occur to intercept18 any more appropriate mode of conveying my homage19 to Mr. Ricardo’s ear, which should else more naturally have been expressed in a direct work on Political Economy. This fear was at length realised—not in the way I had apprehended20, viz. by my own death—but by Mr. Ricardo’s. And now therefore I felt happy that, at whatever price of good taste, I had in some imperfect way made known my sense of his high pretensions—although unfortunately I had given him no means of judging whether my applause were of any value. For during the interval21 between Sept. 1821 and Mr. Ricardo’s death in Sept. 1823 I had found no leisure for completing my work on Political Economy: on that account I had forborne to use the means of introduction to Mr. Ricardo which I commanded through my private connections or simply as a man of letters: and in some measure therefore I owed it to my own neglect—that I had for ever lost the opportunity of benefiting by Mr. Ricardo’s conversation or bringing under his review such new speculations22 of mine in Political Economy as in any point modified his own doctrines—whether as corrections of supposed oversights23, as derivations of the same truth from a higher principle, as further illustrations or proofs of anything which he might have insufficiently24 developed, or simply in the way of supplement to his known and voluntary omissions25. All this I should have done with the utmost fearlessness of giving offence, and not for a moment believing that Mr. Ricardo would have regarded anything in the light of an undue26 liberty, which in the remotest degree might seem to affect the interests of a science so eminently27 indebted to himself. In reality candour may be presumed in a man of first-rate understanding—not merely as a moral quality—but almost as a part of his intellectual constitution per se; a spacious28 and commanding intellect being magnanimous in a manner suo jure, even though it should have the misfortune to be allied29 with a perverse30 or irritable31 temper. On this consideration I would gladly have submitted to the review of Mr. Ricardo, as indisputably the first of critics in this department, rather than to any other person, my own review of himself. That I have forfeited32 the opportunity of doing this—is a source of some self-reproach to myself. I regret also that I have forfeited the opportunity of perhaps giving pleasure to Mr. Ricardo by liberating33 him from a few misrepresentations, and placing his vindication34 upon a firmer basis even than that which he has chosen. In one respect I enjoy an advantage for such a service, and in general for the polemic35 part of Political Economy, which Mr. Ricardo did not. The course of my studies has led me to cultivate the scholastic36 logic37. Mr. Ricardo has obviously neglected it. Confiding38 in his own conscious strength, and no doubt participating in the common error of modern times as to the value of artificial logic, he has taken for granted that the Aristotelian forms and the exquisite39 science of distinctions matured by the subtilty of the schoolmen can achieve nothing in substance which is beyond the power of mere sound good sense and robust40 faculties41 of reasoning; or at most can only attain42 the same end with a little more speed and adroitness43. But this is a great error: and it was an ill day for the human understanding when Lord Bacon gave his countenance44 to a notion, which his own exclusive study of one department in philosophy could alone have suggested. Distinctions previously45 examined—probed—and accurately46 bounded, together with a terminology47 previously established, are the crutches48 on which all minds—the weakest and the strongest—must alike depend in many cases of perplexity: from pure neglect of such aids, which are to the unassisted understanding what weapons are to the unarmed human strength or tools and machinery49 to the naked hand of art, do many branches of knowledge at this day languish50 amongst those which are independent of experiment.
As the best consolation51 to myself for the lost opportunities with which I have here reproached myself,—and as the best means of doing honour to the memory of Mr. Ricardo,—I shall now endeavour to spread the knowledge of what he has performed in Political Economy. To do this in the plainest and most effectual manner, I shall abstain52 from introducing any opinions peculiar53 to myself, excepting only when they may be necessary for the defence of Mr. Ricardo against objections which have obtained currency from the celebrity54 of their authors—or in the few cases where they may be called for by the errors (as I suppose them to be) even of Mr. Ricardo.—In using this language, I do not fear to be taxed with arrogance55: we of this day stand upon the shoulders of our predecessors56; and that I am able to detect any errors in Mr. Ricardo—I owe, in most instances, to Mr. Ricardo himself.
X. Y. Z.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c711/8c7110c6592b18f6ee88b0c1624d2cff50b7bbbb" alt=""
点击
收听单词发音
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d9800/d9800aa57a2817132ac898b1fdffe18ba341b3ed" alt="收听单词发音"
1
briefly
![]() |
|
adv.简单地,简短地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2
steadily
![]() |
|
adv.稳定地;不变地;持续地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3
contemplated
![]() |
|
adj. 预期的 动词contemplate的过去分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4
deliberately
![]() |
|
adv.审慎地;蓄意地;故意地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5
withhold
![]() |
|
v.拒绝,不给;使停止,阻挡 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6
mere
![]() |
|
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7
aberrations
![]() |
|
n.偏差( aberration的名词复数 );差错;脱离常规;心理失常 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8
applied
![]() |
|
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9
benefactor
![]() |
|
n. 恩人,行善的人,捐助人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10
reigned
![]() |
|
vi.当政,统治(reign的过去式形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11
paramount
![]() |
|
a.最重要的,最高权力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12
transcended
![]() |
|
超出或超越(经验、信念、描写能力等)的范围( transcend的过去式和过去分词 ); 优于或胜过… | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13
reverence
![]() |
|
n.敬畏,尊敬,尊严;Reverence:对某些基督教神职人员的尊称;v.尊敬,敬畏,崇敬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14
confessions
![]() |
|
n.承认( confession的名词复数 );自首;声明;(向神父的)忏悔 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15
fully
![]() |
|
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16
testimony
![]() |
|
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17
gratitude
![]() |
|
adj.感激,感谢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18
intercept
![]() |
|
vt.拦截,截住,截击 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19
homage
![]() |
|
n.尊敬,敬意,崇敬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20
apprehended
![]() |
|
逮捕,拘押( apprehend的过去式和过去分词 ); 理解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21
interval
![]() |
|
n.间隔,间距;幕间休息,中场休息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22
speculations
![]() |
|
n.投机买卖( speculation的名词复数 );思考;投机活动;推断 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23
oversights
![]() |
|
n.疏忽( oversight的名词复数 );忽略;失察;负责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24
insufficiently
![]() |
|
adv.不够地,不能胜任地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25
omissions
![]() |
|
n.省略( omission的名词复数 );删节;遗漏;略去或漏掉的事(或人) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26
undue
![]() |
|
adj.过分的;不适当的;未到期的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27
eminently
![]() |
|
adv.突出地;显著地;不寻常地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28
spacious
![]() |
|
adj.广阔的,宽敞的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29
allied
![]() |
|
adj.协约国的;同盟国的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30
perverse
![]() |
|
adj.刚愎的;坚持错误的,行为反常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31
irritable
![]() |
|
adj.急躁的;过敏的;易怒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32
forfeited
![]() |
|
(因违反协议、犯规、受罚等)丧失,失去( forfeit的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33
liberating
![]() |
|
解放,释放( liberate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34
vindication
![]() |
|
n.洗冤,证实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35
polemic
![]() |
|
n.争论,论战 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36
scholastic
![]() |
|
adj.学校的,学院的,学术上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37
logic
![]() |
|
n.逻辑(学);逻辑性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38
confiding
![]() |
|
adj.相信人的,易于相信的v.吐露(秘密,心事等)( confide的现在分词 );(向某人)吐露(隐私、秘密等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39
exquisite
![]() |
|
adj.精美的;敏锐的;剧烈的,感觉强烈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40
robust
![]() |
|
adj.强壮的,强健的,粗野的,需要体力的,浓的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41
faculties
![]() |
|
n.能力( faculty的名词复数 );全体教职员;技巧;院 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42
attain
![]() |
|
vt.达到,获得,完成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43
adroitness
![]() |
|
参考例句: |
|
|
44
countenance
![]() |
|
n.脸色,面容;面部表情;vt.支持,赞同 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45
previously
![]() |
|
adv.以前,先前(地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46
accurately
![]() |
|
adv.准确地,精确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47
terminology
![]() |
|
n.术语;专有名词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48
crutches
![]() |
|
n.拐杖, 支柱 v.支撑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49
machinery
![]() |
|
n.(总称)机械,机器;机构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50
languish
![]() |
|
vi.变得衰弱无力,失去活力,(植物等)凋萎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51
consolation
![]() |
|
n.安慰,慰问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52
abstain
![]() |
|
v.自制,戒绝,弃权,避免 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53
peculiar
![]() |
|
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54
celebrity
![]() |
|
n.名人,名流;著名,名声,名望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55
arrogance
![]() |
|
n.傲慢,自大 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56
predecessors
![]() |
|
n.前任( predecessor的名词复数 );前辈;(被取代的)原有事物;前身 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |