Rosie and Phil shared information and I learned a lot aboutRosie’s life. It was important background for the difficult butessential task of developing a high level of empathy for oneperson in the world.
Rosie and I were on our way to New York, where being weirdis acceptable. That is a simplification of the rationale: in realitywhat was important for me was to be able to make a newstart with my new skills, new approach and new partner,without being held back by others’ perceptions of me –perceptions that I had not only deserved but encouraged.
Here in New York, I am working in the Department ofGenetics at Columbia University, and Rosie is in the first yearof the Doctor of Medicine programme. I am contributing toSimon Lefebvre’s research project remotely, as he insisted on itas a condition of providing funding. I consider it a form ofmoral payback for using the university’s equipment for theFather Project.
280/290We have an apartment in Williamsburg, not far from theEslers, whom we visit regularly. The Cellar Interrogation is nowa story that Isaac and I both tell on social occasions.
We are considering reproducing (or, as I would say in a socialencounter, ‘having children’). In order to prepare for thispossibility, Rosie has ceased smoking, and we have reduced ouralcohol intake3.
Fortunately we have numerous other activities to distract usfrom these addictive4 behaviours. Rosie and I work in a cocktailbar together three evenings a week. It is exhausting at times,but social and fun, and supplements my academic salary.
We listen to music. I have revised my approach to Bach, andam no longer trying to follow individual notes. It is moresuccessful, but my music tastes seem to have been locked in inmy teens. As a result of failing to make my own selections atthat time, my preferences are those of my father. I canadvance a well-reasoned argument that nothing worth listeningto was recorded after 1972. Rosie and I have that argumentfrequently. I cook, but reserve the meals of the StandardisedMeal System for dinner parties.
We are officially married. Although I had performed theromantic ritual with the ring, I did not expect Rosie, as amodern feminist5, to want to actually get married. The term‘wife’ in Wife Project had always meant ‘female life partner’.
But she decided6 that she should have‘one relationship in my life that was what it was supposed tobe’. That included monogamy and permanence. An excellentoutcome.
I am able to hug Rosie. This was the issue that caused me themost fear after she agreed to live with me. I generally findbody contact unpleasant, but sex is an obvious exception. Sexsolved the body contact problem. We are now also able to hugwithout having sex, which is obviously convenient at times.
Once a week, in order to deal with the demands of living withanother person, and to continue to improve my skills in thissphere, I spend281/290an evening in therapy. This is a small joke: my ‘therapist’ isDave and I provide reciprocal services to him. Dave is alsomarried and, considering that I am supposedly wired differently,our challenges are surprisingly similar. He sometimes bringsmale friends and colleagues from work, where he is arefrigeration engineer. We are all Yankees fans.
For some time, Rosie did not mention the Father Project. Iattributed this to the improved relationship with Phil and thedistraction of other activities. But, in the background, I wasprocessing some new information.
At the wedding, Dr Eamonn Hughes, the first person we hadtested, asked to speak to me privately7.
‘There’s something you should know,’ he said. ‘About Rosie’sfather.’
It seemed entirely8 plausible9 that Rosie’s mother’s closest friendfrom medical school would know the answer. Perhaps we hadonly needed to ask. But Eamonn was referring to somethingelse. He pointed10 to Phil.
‘Phil’s been a bit of a screw-up with Rosie.’
So it wasn’t only Rosie who thought Phil was a poor parent.
‘You know about the car accident?’
I nodded, although I had no detailed11 information. Rosie hadmade it clear that she did not want to discuss it.
‘Bernadette was driving because Phil had been drinking.’
I had deduced that Phil was in the car.
‘Phil got out, with a broken pelvis, and pulled Rosie out.’
Eamonn paused. He was obviously distressed12. ‘He pulled Rosieout first.’
This was truly an awful scenario13, but as a geneticist myimmediate thought was ‘of course’. Phil’s behaviour, in pain andunder extreme pressure, would surely have been instinctual.
Such life-and-death situations occur regularly in the animalkingdom and Phil’s choice was in line with theory andexperimental results. While he had presumably revisited thatmoment many times in his mind, and his later feelings282/290towards Rosie may have been severely14 affected15 by it, hisactions were consistent with the primitive16 drive to protect thecarrier of his genes17.
It was only later that I realised my obvious error. As Rosiewas not Phil’s biological daughter, such instincts would not havebeen applicable. I spent some time reflecting on the possibleexplanations for his behaviour. I did not share my thoughts orthe hypothesis I formed.
When I was established at Columbia, I requested permission touse the DNA18-testing facilities for a private investigation19. Theywere willing to let me do so. It would not have been aproblem if they had refused. I could have sent my remainingsamples to a commercial laboratory and paid a few hundreddollars for the tests. This option had been available to Rosiefrom the beginning of the Father Project. It is now obvious tome that I did not alert Rosie to that option because I wassubconsciously interested in a relationship with her even then.
Amazing!
I did not tell Rosie about the test. One day I just packed mybag with the samples that I had brought with me to NewYork.
I started with the paranoid plastic surgeon, Freyberg, who wasthe least likely candidate in my assessment20. A green-eyed fatherwas not impossible, but there was no other evidence makinghim more probable than any of the previous candidates. Hisreluctance to send me a blood sample was explained by himbeing a generally suspicious and unhelpful person. Myprediction was correct.
I loaded Esler’s specimen21, a swab from a fork that hadtravelled more than halfway22 around the world and back again.
In his darkened basement, I had been certain he was Rosie’sfather. But afterwards I had come to the conclusion that hecould have been protecting a friend or the memory of a friend.
I wondered if Esler’s decision to become a psychiatrist23 hadbeen influenced by the suicide of the best man at his wedding,Geoffrey Case.
I tested the sample. Isaac Esler was not Rosie’s father.
283/290I picked up Gene1’s sample. My best friend. He was workinghard on his marriage. The map was no longer on his wallwhen I went in to submit my resignation to the Dean. But Ihad no recollection of seeing a pin in Ireland, Rosie’s mother’sbirthplace. There was no need to test the table napkin. I tossedit in the waste bin24.
I had now eliminated every candidate except Geoffrey Case.
Isaac Esler had told me that he knew who Rosie’s father wasand that he was sworn to secrecy25. Did Rosie’s mother – andEsler – not want Rosie to know that there was a family historyof suicide? Or perhaps a genetic2 predisposition to mentalillness? Or that Geoffrey Case had possibly killed himself in thewake of the news that he was Rosie’s father and that hermother had decided to remain with Phil? These were all goodreasons – good enough that I considered it highly likely thatRosie’s mother’s one-night encounter had been with GeoffreyCase.
I reached into my bag and pulled out the DNA sample thatfate had delivered to me without Rosie’s knowledge. I was nowalmost certain that it would confirm my hypothesis as to herpaternity.
I cut a small portion of the cloth, poured over the reagent,and let it sit for a few minutes. As I watched the fabric26 in theclear solution, and mentally reviewed the Father Project, Ibecame more and more confident in my prediction. I decidedthat Rosie should join me for this result, regardless of whetherI was right or wrong. I texted her. She was on campus andarrived a few minutes later. She immediately realised what Iwas doing.
I put the processed sample in the machine, and waited whilethe analysis proceeded. We watched the computer screentogether until the result came up. After all the blood-collecting,cheek-swabbing, cocktail-shaking, wall-climbing, glass-collecting,flying, driving, proposal-writing, urine-mopping, cup-stealing,fork-wiping, tissue-retrieving, toothbrush-stealing,hairbrush-cleaning and tear-wiping, we had a match.
284/290Rosie had wanted to know who her biological father was. Hermother had wanted the identity of the man she had sex with,perhaps only once, on an occasion of emotion-drivenrule-breaking, to remain a secret forever. I could now fulfil bothof their wishes.
I showed her the remains27 of the blood-stained singlet fromJarman’s Gym with the sample square cut out of it. Therewould be no need to test the handkerchief that had wipedMargaret Case’s tears.
Ultimately, the entire father problem was caused by Gene. Healmost certainly taught the medical students an oversimplifiedmodel of the inheritance of common traits. If Rosie’s motherhad known that eye colour was not a reliable indicator28 ofpaternity, and organised a DNA test to confirm her suspicions,there would have been no Father Project, no Great CocktailNight, no New York Adventure, no Reform Don Project – andno Rosie Project. Had it not been for this unscheduled seriesof events, her daughter and I would not have fallen in love.
And I would still be eating lobster29 every Tuesday night.
Incredible.
AcknowledgmentsThe Rosie Project was written quickly. I poked30 my head upfor just long enough to consult with my writer wife Anne,daughter Dominique and my novel-writing class at RMIT, ledby Michelle Aung Thin.
After being adopted by Text Publishing, the manuscriptbenefited enormously from the attentions of my editor, AlisonArnold, who understood exactly what I was aiming for, and thepassionate support of Michael Heyward and his team, inparticular Jane Novak, Kirsty Wilson, Chong Weng Ho andMichelle Calligaro. Anne Beilby’s efforts in bringing Rosie to theattention of international publishers have ensured that Don andRosie’s story will be told in thirty languages.
But the underlying31 story has a longer pedigree. It began as ascreenplay, developed during screenwriting studies at RMIT.
Anne, my son Daniel and I workshopped the original plotduring a walk in New Zealand. A work-up for the characterswas published as The Klara Project: Phase 1 in TheEnvelope Please in 2007 and I completed the first draft of thescreenplay, with a different plot and a nerdy Hungarian Klarainstead of Rosie, in 2008, having taken some time to decidethat it was a comedy rather than a drama. The story changedsignificantly over five years, very much for the better, and forthat I have to thank the many people who encouraged,criticised and pushed me not to be satisfied with what I had.
The faculty32 at RMIT taught me the principles of story-telling, aswell as offering specific advice on the script. Special mentionsare due to286/290Clare Renner, Head of School; Tim Ferguson, comedy legend;David Rapsey and Ian Pringle, seasoned film producers whodid not stint33 on the tough love; and Boris Trbic who gave mean appreciation34 for the screwball comedy. Cary Grant wouldhave made a perfect Don. Jo Moylan was my writing buddythrough a year of the most radical35 changes. Making short filmswith the audiovisual students, under the leadership of RowanHumphrey and Simon Embury, taught me much about whatworked and what didn’t. As I watched my extraneous36 dia-loguehit the digital equivalent of the cutting-room floor, I learned alot about writing economically. Kim Krejus of 16th Street ActorsStu-dio organised talented actors for an enlightening reading.
I am fortunate to belong to a talented and hard-workingwriters’
group: Irina Goundortseva, Steve Mitchell, Susannah Petty andMay Yeung. Rosie was regularly on the agenda, and Irina’senthusiasm for the short story was instrumental in my taking itfurther. Later, Heidi Winnen was the first person outside myfamily to suggest that the novel might have potential.
The script benefited from the astute37 feedback of screenwritinggurus Steve Kaplan and Michael Hauge. Their involvement wasin turn made possible by Marcus West of Inscription38 and theAustralian Writers’
Guild39 who sponsored a prize for romantic comedy writing in2010.
Producers Peter Lee and Ros Walker and director John PaulFischbach also offered valuable criticism.
The path to publication began when The Rosie Project wonthe Victorian Premier’s Literary Award for an unpublishedmanuscript in 2012, and I acknowledge the Victorian StateGovernment and the Wheeler Centre for sponsoring andadministering the award. I also thank the judges, Nick Gadd,Peter Mews, Zoe Dattner and Roderick Poole, for their bravechoice.
Many other people have supported Rosie and me on thesix-year journey from concept to published novel, notably40 JonBackhouse,287/290Rebecca Carter, Cameron Clarke, Sara Cullen, Fran Cusworth,Barbara Gliddon, Amanda Golding, Vin Hedger, Kate Hicks,Amy Jasper, Noel Maloney, Brian McKenzie, Steve Melnikoff,Ben Michael, Helen O’Connell, Rebecca Peniston-Bird, AprilReeve, John Reeves, Sue and Chris Waddell, Geri and PeteWalsh, and my fellow students at RMIT.
Don’s lobster salad is based on a recipe from Teage Ezard’sContem-porary Australian Food. Perfect for a romanticevening on a balcony with a bottle of Drappier roséChampagne.
The End
点击收听单词发音
1 gene | |
n.遗传因子,基因 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 genetic | |
adj.遗传的,遗传学的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 intake | |
n.吸入,纳入;进气口,入口 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 addictive | |
adj.(吸毒等)使成瘾的,成为习惯的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 feminist | |
adj.主张男女平等的,女权主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 privately | |
adv.以私人的身份,悄悄地,私下地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 plausible | |
adj.似真实的,似乎有理的,似乎可信的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 pointed | |
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 detailed | |
adj.详细的,详尽的,极注意细节的,完全的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 distressed | |
痛苦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 scenario | |
n.剧本,脚本;概要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 severely | |
adv.严格地;严厉地;非常恶劣地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 primitive | |
adj.原始的;简单的;n.原(始)人,原始事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 genes | |
n.基因( gene的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 DNA | |
(缩)deoxyribonucleic acid 脱氧核糖核酸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 investigation | |
n.调查,调查研究 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 assessment | |
n.评价;评估;对财产的估价,被估定的金额 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 specimen | |
n.样本,标本 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 halfway | |
adj.中途的,不彻底的,部分的;adv.半路地,在中途,在半途 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 psychiatrist | |
n.精神病专家;精神病医师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 bin | |
n.箱柜;vt.放入箱内;[计算机] DOS文件名:二进制目标文件 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 secrecy | |
n.秘密,保密,隐蔽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 fabric | |
n.织物,织品,布;构造,结构,组织 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 indicator | |
n.指标;指示物,指示者;指示器 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 lobster | |
n.龙虾,龙虾肉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 poked | |
v.伸出( poke的过去式和过去分词 );戳出;拨弄;与(某人)性交 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 underlying | |
adj.在下面的,含蓄的,潜在的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 faculty | |
n.才能;学院,系;(学院或系的)全体教学人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 stint | |
v.节省,限制,停止;n.舍不得化,节约,限制;连续不断的一段时间从事某件事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 appreciation | |
n.评价;欣赏;感谢;领会,理解;价格上涨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 radical | |
n.激进份子,原子团,根号;adj.根本的,激进的,彻底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 extraneous | |
adj.体外的;外来的;外部的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 astute | |
adj.机敏的,精明的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 inscription | |
n.(尤指石块上的)刻印文字,铭文,碑文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 guild | |
n.行会,同业公会,协会 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 notably | |
adv.值得注意地,显著地,尤其地,特别地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |