In other lands a reasonable pride of birth has always been one of the bonds holding communities together, and is estimated at its just value. We, after having practically ignored the subject for half a century, suddenly rush to the other extreme, and develop an entire forest of genealogical trees at a growth.
Chagrined7, probably, at the small amount of consideration that their superior birth commanded, a number of aristocratically minded matrons united a few years ago as “Daughters of the Revolution,” restricting membership to women descended8 from officers of Washington’s army. There may have been a reason for the formation of this society. I say “may” because it does not seem quite clear what its aim was. The originators doubtless imagined they were founding an exclusive circle, but the numbers who clamored for admittance quickly dispelled9 this illusion. So a small group of the elect withdrew in disgust and banded together under the cognomen10 of “Colonial Dames11.”
The only result of these two movements was to awaken12 envy, hatred13, and malice14 in the hearts of those excluded from the mysterious rites15, which to outsiders seemed to consist in blackballing as many aspirants16 as possible. Some victims of this bad treatment, thirsting for revenge, struck on the happy thought of inaugurating an “Aztec” society. As that title conveyed absolutely no idea to any one, its members were forced to explain that only descendants of officers who fought in the Mexican War were eligible17. What the elect did when they got into the circle was not specified18.
The “Social Order of Foreign Wars” was the next creation, its authors evidently considering the Mexican campaign as a domestic article, a sort of family squabble. Then the “Children of 1812” attracted attention, both groups having immediate3 success. Indeed, the vogue19 of these enterprises has been in inverse20 ratio to their usefulness or raison d’être, people apparently21 being ready to join anything rather than get left out in the cold.
Jealous probably of seeing women enjoying all the fun, their husbands and brothers next banded together as “Sons of the Revolution.” The wives retaliated22 by instituting the “Granddaughters of the Revolution” and “The Mayflower Order,” the “price of admission” to the latter being descent from some one who crossed in that celebrated23 ship—whether as one of the crew or as passenger is not clear.
It was not, however, in the American temperament to rest content with modest beginnings, the national motto being, “The best is good enough for me.” So wind was quickly taken out of the Mayflower’s sails by “The Royal Order of the Crown,” to which none need apply who were not prepared to prove descent from one or more royal ancestors. It was not stated in the prospectus24 whether Irish sovereigns and Fiji Island kings counted, but I have been told that bar sinisters form a class apart, and are deprived of the right to vote or hold office.
Descent from any old king was, however, not sufficient for the high-toned people of our republic. When you come to think of it, such a circle might be “mixed.” One really must draw the line somewhere (as the Boston parvenu25 replied when asked why he had not invited his brother to a ball). So the founders26 of the “Circle of Holland Dames of the New Netherlands” drew the line at descent from a sovereign of the Low Countries. It does not seem as if this could be a large society, although those old Dutch pashas had an unconscionable number of children.
The promoters of this enterprise seem nevertheless to have been fairly successful, for they gave a fête recently and crowned a queen. To be acclaimed27 their sovereign by a group of people all of royal birth is indeed an honor. Rumors28 of this ceremony have come to us outsiders. It is said that they employed only lineal descendants of Vatel to prepare their banquet, and I am assured that an offspring of Gambrinus acted as butler.
But it is wrong to joke on this subject. The state of affairs is becoming too serious. When sane29 human beings form a “Baronial Order of Runnymede,” and announce in their prospectus that only descendants through the male line from one (or more) of the forty noblemen who forced King John to sign the Magna Charta are what our Washington Mrs. Malaprop would call “legible,” the action attests30 a diseased condition of the community. Any one taking the trouble to remember that eight of the original barons31 died childless, and that the Wars of the Roses swept away nine tenths of what families the others may have had, that only one man in England (Lord de Ros) can at the present day prove male descent further back than the eleventh century, must appreciate the absurdity32 of our compatriots’ pretensions33. Burke’s Peerage is acknowledged to be the most “faked” volume in the English language, but the descents it attributes are like mathematical demonstrations34 compared to the “trees” that members of these new American orders climb.
When my class was graduated from Mr. McMullen’s school, we little boys had the brilliant idea of uniting in a society, but were greatly put about for an effective name, hitting finally upon that of Ancient Seniors’ Society. For a group of infants, this must be acknowledged to have been a luminous35 inspiration. We had no valid36 reason for forming that society, not being particularly fond of each other. Living in several cities, we rarely met after leaving school and had little to say to each other when we did. But it sounded so fine to be an “Ancient Senior,” and we hoped in our next school to impress new companions with that title and make them feel proper respect for us in consequence. Pride, however, sustained a fall when it was pointed37 out that the initials formed the ominous38 word “Ass.”
I have a shrewd suspicion that the motives39 which prompted our youthful actions are not very different from those now inciting40 children of a larger growth to band together, blackball their friends, crown queens, and perform other senseless mummeries, such as having the weathercock of a departed meeting-house brought in during a banquet, and dressing41 restaurant waiters in knickerbockers for “one night only.”
This malarial42 condition of our social atmosphere accounts for the quantity of genealogical quacks43 that have taken to sending typewritten letters, stating that the interest they take in your private affairs compels them to offer proof of your descent from any crowned head to whom you may have taken a fancy. One correspondent assured me only this month that he had papers in his possession showing beyond a doubt that I might claim a certain King McDougal of Scotland for an ancestor. I have misgivings44, however, as to the quality of the royal blood in my veins45, for the same correspondent was equally confident six months ago that my people came in direct line from Charlemagne. As I have no desire to “corner” the market in kings, these letters have remained unanswered.
Considering the mania46 to trace descent from illustrious men, it astonishes me that a Mystic Band, consisting of lineal descendants from the Seven Sages47 of Greece, has not before now burst upon an astonished world. It has been suggested that if some one wanted to organize a truly restricted circle, “The Grandchildren of our Tripoli War” would be an excellent title. So few Americans took part in that conflict—and still fewer know anything about it—that the satisfaction of joining the society would be immense to exclusively-minded people.
There is only one explanation that seems in any way to account for this vast tomfoolery. A little sentence, printed at the bottom of a prospectus recently sent to me, lets the ambitious cat out of the genealogical bag. It states that “social position is assured to people joining our order.” Thanks to the idiotic48 habit some newspapers have inaugurated of advertising49, gratis50, a number of self-elected society “leaders,” many feeble-minded people, with more ambition than cash, and a larger supply of family papers than brains, have been bitten with a social madness, and enter these traps, thinking they are the road to position and honors. The number of fools is larger than one would have believed possible, if the success of so many “orders,” “circles,” “commanderies,” and “regencies” were not there to testify to the unending folly51 of the would-be “smart.”
This last decade of the century has brought to light many strange fads52 and senseless manias53. This “descent” craze, however, surpasses them all in inanity54. The keepers of insane asylums55 will tell you that one of the hopeless forms of madness is la folie des grandeurs. A breath of this delirium56 seems to be blowing over our country. Crowns and sceptres haunt the dreams of simple republican men and women, troubling their slumbers57 and leading them a will-o’-the-wisp dance back across the centuries.
点击收听单词发音
1 undoubtedly | |
adv.确实地,无疑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 temperament | |
n.气质,性格,性情 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 fad | |
n.时尚;一时流行的狂热;一时的爱好 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 curiously | |
adv.有求知欲地;好问地;奇特地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 standing | |
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 chagrined | |
adj.懊恼的,苦恼的v.使懊恼,使懊丧,使悔恨( chagrin的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 descended | |
a.为...后裔的,出身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 dispelled | |
v.驱散,赶跑( dispel的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 cognomen | |
n.姓;绰号 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 dames | |
n.(在英国)夫人(一种封号),夫人(爵士妻子的称号)( dame的名词复数 );女人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 awaken | |
vi.醒,觉醒;vt.唤醒,使觉醒,唤起,激起 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 hatred | |
n.憎恶,憎恨,仇恨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 malice | |
n.恶意,怨恨,蓄意;[律]预谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 rites | |
仪式,典礼( rite的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 aspirants | |
n.有志向或渴望获得…的人( aspirant的名词复数 )v.渴望的,有抱负的,追求名誉或地位的( aspirant的第三人称单数 );有志向或渴望获得…的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 eligible | |
adj.有条件被选中的;(尤指婚姻等)合适(意)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 specified | |
adj.特定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 Vogue | |
n.时髦,时尚;adj.流行的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 inverse | |
adj.相反的,倒转的,反转的;n.相反之物;v.倒转 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 retaliated | |
v.报复,反击( retaliate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 celebrated | |
adj.有名的,声誉卓著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 prospectus | |
n.计划书;说明书;慕股书 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 parvenu | |
n.暴发户,新贵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 founders | |
n.创始人( founder的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 acclaimed | |
adj.受人欢迎的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 rumors | |
n.传闻( rumor的名词复数 );[古]名誉;咕哝;[古]喧嚷v.传闻( rumor的第三人称单数 );[古]名誉;咕哝;[古]喧嚷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 sane | |
adj.心智健全的,神志清醒的,明智的,稳健的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 attests | |
v.证明( attest的第三人称单数 );证实;声称…属实;使宣誓 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 barons | |
男爵( baron的名词复数 ); 巨头; 大王; 大亨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 absurdity | |
n.荒谬,愚蠢;谬论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 pretensions | |
自称( pretension的名词复数 ); 自命不凡; 要求; 权力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 demonstrations | |
证明( demonstration的名词复数 ); 表明; 表达; 游行示威 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 luminous | |
adj.发光的,发亮的;光明的;明白易懂的;有启发的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 valid | |
adj.有确实根据的;有效的;正当的,合法的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 pointed | |
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 ominous | |
adj.不祥的,不吉的,预兆的,预示的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 motives | |
n.动机,目的( motive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 inciting | |
刺激的,煽动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 dressing | |
n.(食物)调料;包扎伤口的用品,敷料 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 malarial | |
患疟疾的,毒气的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 quacks | |
abbr.quacksalvers 庸医,骗子(16世纪习惯用水银或汞治疗梅毒的人)n.江湖医生( quack的名词复数 );江湖郎中;(鸭子的)呱呱声v.(鸭子)发出嘎嘎声( quack的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 misgivings | |
n.疑虑,担忧,害怕;疑虑,担心,恐惧( misgiving的名词复数 );疑惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 veins | |
n.纹理;矿脉( vein的名词复数 );静脉;叶脉;纹理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 mania | |
n.疯狂;躁狂症,狂热,癖好 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 sages | |
n.圣人( sage的名词复数 );智者;哲人;鼠尾草(可用作调料) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 idiotic | |
adj.白痴的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 advertising | |
n.广告业;广告活动 a.广告的;广告业务的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 gratis | |
adj.免费的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 folly | |
n.愚笨,愚蠢,蠢事,蠢行,傻话 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 fads | |
n.一时的流行,一时的风尚( fad的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 manias | |
n.(mania的复数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 inanity | |
n.无意义,无聊 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 asylums | |
n.避难所( asylum的名词复数 );庇护;政治避难;精神病院 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 delirium | |
n. 神智昏迷,说胡话;极度兴奋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 slumbers | |
睡眠,安眠( slumber的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |