Which is More Ungrateful, a People or a Prince
It appears to me apropos1 of the above written matter to discuss with example who practiced this ingratitude2 more, a People or a Prince. And to discuss this part further, I say that this vice4 of ingratitude arises either from avarice5 or from suspicion: For when a People or a Prince has sent out one of its Captains on an important expedition, where that Captain (having won) has acquired great glory, that People or that Prince is bound in turn to reward him: and if in place of a reward they, moved by avarice, either dishonor or offend him, not wanting (held back by this cupidity) to take the trouble, they make an error that has no excuse, but will leave behind for them an eternal infamy7. Yet many Princes are found who err6 in this way. And Cornelius Tacitus tells the reason in this sentence; An injury is more apt to be repaid than a benefit, where gratitude3 is onerous8 and exultation9 is had in revenge. But when they do not reward one; or (to say it better) they offend one, moved not by avarice, but by suspicion, then both the People and Prince merit some excuse. And much is read of this ingratitude shown for such reasons, for that Captain who by his virtu has conquered an Empire for his Lord, overcoming the enemy and filling himself with glory and his soldiers with riches, of necessity acquires so much reputation with his soldiers, with his enemies, and with the Prince’s very own subjects, that that victory can be distasteful to that Lord who had sent him. And because the nature of men is ambitious and suspicious, and puts no limits on the fortune of anyone, it is not impossible that the suspicion which is suddenly aroused in the Prince after the victory of his captain, may not by itself have been increased by some of his actions or expressions made insolently10. So that the Prince cannot think otherwise than to secure himself: and to do this thinks of either having him die or taking away from him that reputation which he gained among his army and the people, and with all industry show that the victory was not due to the virtu of that [Captain], but by chance and cowardice11 of the enemy, or by the wisdom of other Captains who had been with him in that action.
After Vespasian, while in Judea, was declared Emperor by his army, Antonius Primus, who was to be found with another army in Illyria, took his side, and came into Italy against Vitellius who reigned12 in Rome, and with the greatest virtu routed two armies of Vitellius and occupied Rome, so that through the virtu of Antonius, Mutianus, who had been sent by Vespasian, found everything achieved and all difficulties overcome. The reward which Antonius received was that Mutianus took away from him the command of the army, and little by little reduced his authority in Rome to nothing: so that Antonius went to find Vespasian who was yet in Asia, by whom he was received in such a fashion, that in a brief time, having been reduced to no rank, died almost in despair. And histories are full of such examples.
In our own times anyone now living knows with what industry and virtu Gonsalvo Ferrante, fighting in the Kingdom of Naples for Ferrando King of Aragon against the French, had conquered and won that Kingdom, and was rewarded for his victory by Ferrando, who departed from Aragon and came to Naples, where he first took away from him the command of the armed forces, then took away from him the fortresses13, and then took him with him to Spain, where in a short time he died unhonored.
And this suspicion, therefore, is so natural in Princes that they cannot defend themselves against them, and it is impossible for them to show gratitude toward those who, by victory under their ensigns, have made great conquest. And if a Prince cannot defend himself from them, is it not a miracle or something worthy14 of greater consideration, that a people does not also defend itself; for a City which exists free has two objectives, one conquering, the other maintaining itself free, and it happens that because of excessive love for both of these it makes errors. As to the errors made in conquering, they will be spoken of in their proper place. As to the errors made in maintaining itself free, among others they are those of offending those Citizens whom it ought to reward, and of having suspicion of those in whom it ought to have confidence. And although these things in a Republic already corrupted15 cause great evils, and which many times rather leads to tyranny, as happened in Rome under Caesar who took by force that which ingratitude denied him, none the less in a Republic not yet corrupted they are the cause of great good, and make for a longer free existence, maintaining itself because the fear of punishment makes men better and less ambitious.
It is true that among all the people who ever had an Empire for reasons discussed above, Rome was the least ungrateful, for it can be said there is no other example of her ingratitude than that of Scipio; for Coriolanus and Camillus were both made exiles because of the injuries that the one and the other had inflicted16 on the Plebs: But he one was never pardoned for having always preserved a hostile spirit against the People: the other was not only recalled [from exile], but for the rest of his life was adored as a Prince. But the ingratitude shown to Scipio arose from a suspicion that the Citizens begun to have of him that was never had of others, which [suspicion] arose from the greatness of the enemy that Scipio conquered, from the reputation which that victory in such a long and perilous17 war had given him, from the rapidity of it, from the favor which his youth, his prudence18, and his other memorable19 virtues20 had acquired for him. These were so many, that for no other reason, the Magistrates21 of Rome feared his authority, which displeased22 intelligent men as something unheard of in Rome. And his manner of living appeared so extraordinary that Cato the elder, reputed a saint, was the first to go against him, and to say that a City could not be called free where there was a Citizen who was feared by the Magistrates. So that if the people of Rome in this case followed the opinion of Cato, they merit the excuse that I said above was merited by those People and those Princes who, because of suspicion, are ungrateful. Concluding this discourse23, therefore, I say that using this vice of ingratitude for either avarice or suspicion, it will be seen that the People never use it from avarice, and from suspicion much less than do Princes, having less reason for suspicion, as will be told below.
1 apropos | |
adv.恰好地;adj.恰当的;关于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 ingratitude | |
n.忘恩负义 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 gratitude | |
adj.感激,感谢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 vice | |
n.坏事;恶习;[pl.]台钳,老虎钳;adj.副的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 avarice | |
n.贪婪;贪心 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 err | |
vi.犯错误,出差错 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 infamy | |
n.声名狼藉,出丑,恶行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 onerous | |
adj.繁重的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 exultation | |
n.狂喜,得意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 insolently | |
adv.自豪地,自傲地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 cowardice | |
n.胆小,怯懦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 reigned | |
vi.当政,统治(reign的过去式形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 fortresses | |
堡垒,要塞( fortress的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 worthy | |
adj.(of)值得的,配得上的;有价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 corrupted | |
(使)败坏( corrupt的过去式和过去分词 ); (使)腐化; 引起(计算机文件等的)错误; 破坏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 inflicted | |
把…强加给,使承受,遭受( inflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 perilous | |
adj.危险的,冒险的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 prudence | |
n.谨慎,精明,节俭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 memorable | |
adj.值得回忆的,难忘的,特别的,显著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 virtues | |
美德( virtue的名词复数 ); 德行; 优点; 长处 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 magistrates | |
地方法官,治安官( magistrate的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 displeased | |
a.不快的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 discourse | |
n.论文,演说;谈话;话语;vi.讲述,著述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |