Weak Republics are Irresolute1 and do not know how to decide; and if they take up any Proceeding2, it results more from Necessity than from Election
Because of a very great pestilence3 occurring in Rome, it appeared to the Volscians and the Equeans that the time had come for them to be able to attack Rome, these two people raised a large army and assaulted the Latins and the Ernicians, and their country being laid waste, the Latins and Ernicians were constrained4 to make it [to be] known to Rome, and pray that they might be defended by the Romans, but the Romans being afflicted5 by the pestilence, answered them that they should take up the proceeding of defending themselves with arms, for they were not able to defend them. In which is recognized the generosity6 and prudence7 of that Senate, that in every circumstance they always wanted to be the one that should be Prince of [make] the decisions which her subjects had to take; nor were they ever ashamed to decide something contrary to their mode of living or to other decisions previously8 made by them, whenever necessity should compel them. I say this, because at other times the same them, whenever necessity should compel them. I say this, because at other times the same Senate had forbidden the said people to arm and defend themselves, so that to a less prudent9 Senate it would then have seemed to them a falling from their dignity to concede to them this defense10. But that [Senate] always judged things as they ought to be judged, and always took the less objectionable proceeding as the better; for they knew the evil of not being able to defend their subjects, and they knew also the evil of letting them arm themselves without them [the Romans], for the reasons given and many others that are understood: none the less knowing that they [thy Latins and Ernicians] had in any case armed themselves from necessity, having the enemy upon them, they took the honorable course and decided11 to let them do what had to be done with their permission, so that having once disobeyed from necessity, they might not accustom12 themselves to disobeying from choice.
And although this would appear to be a proceeding that every Republic ought to have taken, none the less weak and ill-advised Republics do not know how to assume it, nor how to gain honor in a similar necessity. The Duke of Valentino had taken Faenza and made Bologna submit to his terms. Afterwards wanting to return to Rome by way of Tuscany, he sent one of his men to Florence to ask passage for himself and his army. In Florence they consulted how this thing should be managed, but everyone counselled that it not be conceded to them. The Roman way was not followed in this, for the Duke being very well armed, and the Florentines disarmed13 so that they could not prohibit the passage, it was much more to their honor that it should appear that he [the Duke] passed with their permission than by force; for as it was they had nothing but shame, which would have in part been less if they had managed otherwise. But the worst part that weak Republics have, is to be irresolute; so that all the proceedings14 they take are taken by force, and if anything good should be done by them, they do it by force and not by their prudence. I want to give two other examples of this which occurred in our times in the State [Government] of our City in the year one thousand five hundred [1500].
King Louis XII of France having retaken Milan, wanting to restore Pisa in order to obtain the fifty thousand ducats that had been promised him by the Florentines after such restitution15, he sent his armies toward Pisa captained by Monsignor De Beaumont, who, although French, was none the less a man in whom the Florentines had great confidence. This Captain placed himself and his army between Cascina and Pisa in order [to go] to assail16 the walls, where delaying several days to organize themselves for the capture, Pisan Orators17 [Ambassadors] came to Beaumont and offered to give up the City to the French army, with terms that under the pledge of the King he promise not to put them into the hands of the Florentines until four months after [the surrender]. This proceeding was completely refused by the Florentines, so that after beginning the siege, it followed that [he had to raise it and] he had to retire in shame. Nor was the proceeding refused for any other reason than the mistrust of the faith of the King, into whose hands they had been forced to place themselves because of their weak counsel; and on the other hand, while they did not trust him, neither were they able to see that it would have been easier for the King to restore Pisa to them after he had gone inside the City, and if he did not restore it to expose his mind [perfidy]; but not having [the City] he could promise it to them and they would be forced to buy that promise: So that it would have been much more useful to them to have consented that Beaumont should have taken it [Pisa] under any promise, as was seen in the subsequent experience in the year MDII [1502] when Arezzo having rebelled, Monsignor Imbault was sent by the King of France to the succor18 of the Florentines with French forces, who, arriving near Arezzo, soon began to negotiate an accord with the Arentines who were [willing] to give up the town under certain pledges similar to those [asked] by the Pisans. This proposal was rejected in Florence: when Monsignor Imbault learned of this, and it appeared to him that the Florentines little understood him, he began to hold negotiations19 for the treaty [of surrender] on his own without the participation20 of the Commissioners21 so that he could conclude it in his own way; and under it, he entered with his forces into Arezzo, making the Florentines understand that they were fools and did not understand the things of the world: that if they wanted Arezzo, they should let the King know, who was much better able to give it to them with his forces inside that City rather than [with them] outside. In Florence they did not cease abusing and censuring22 the said Imbault, nor did they stop until they realized that if Beaumont had been like Imbault, they would have had Pisa as [they had] Arezzo.
And so to return to the subject, irresolute Republics never take up good proceedings except by force; for their weakness never allows them to decide where there is any doubt, and if that doubt is not dispelled23 by some violence which pushes the, they always remain in suspense24.
1 irresolute | |
adj.无决断的,优柔寡断的,踌躇不定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 proceeding | |
n.行动,进行,(pl.)会议录,学报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 pestilence | |
n.瘟疫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 constrained | |
adj.束缚的,节制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 afflicted | |
使受痛苦,折磨( afflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 generosity | |
n.大度,慷慨,慷慨的行为 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 prudence | |
n.谨慎,精明,节俭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 previously | |
adv.以前,先前(地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 prudent | |
adj.谨慎的,有远见的,精打细算的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 decided | |
adj.决定了的,坚决的;明显的,明确的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 accustom | |
vt.使适应,使习惯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 disarmed | |
v.裁军( disarm的过去式和过去分词 );使息怒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 proceedings | |
n.进程,过程,议程;诉讼(程序);公报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 restitution | |
n.赔偿;恢复原状 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 assail | |
v.猛烈攻击,抨击,痛斥 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 orators | |
n.演说者,演讲家( orator的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 succor | |
n.援助,帮助;v.给予帮助 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 negotiations | |
协商( negotiation的名词复数 ); 谈判; 完成(难事); 通过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 participation | |
n.参与,参加,分享 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 commissioners | |
n.专员( commissioner的名词复数 );长官;委员;政府部门的长官 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 censuring | |
v.指责,非难,谴责( censure的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 dispelled | |
v.驱散,赶跑( dispel的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 suspense | |
n.(对可能发生的事)紧张感,担心,挂虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |