Whether Skirmishes Before an Engagement are Necessary, and How to Recognize a New Enemy If They are Avoided
It appears that in the actions of men (as we discussed at other times) there is found, in addition to the other difficulties when it is desired to conclude something successfully, that good is always accompanied by some evil, which so easily arises with that good, that it appears impossible to do without the one when desiring the other; and this is seen in all the things that men do. And, therefore, good is acquired with difficulty, unless you are aided by fortune in a way that she, with her power, overcomes the ordinary and natural difficulties.
The combat between Manlius Torquatus and the Gaul makes me remember this, of which Titus Livius says: So much influence did the momentous1 outcome of that fight have on the whole war, that the army of the Gauls, having precipituously retreated from their camps, fled across the Tiber, and then into the fields of Campania. For, on the one hand I consider that a good Captain ought to avoid entirely2 doing anything of little importance which can have a bad effect on his army; for to begin a battle where he cannot employ all his strength and where he risks his entire fortune, is a completely foolhardy thing, as I said above when I condemned3 the guarding of passes. On the other hand. I consider that a wise Captain, when he comes to encounter a new enemy which has reputation, finds it necessary before coming to an engagement for his soldiers to probe such enemies by skirmishes, so that they begin to know him and how to handle him and lose any terror which their fame and reputation may have given them. And this part [of his duties] in a Captain is most important, for he feels almost a necessity in himself which constrains4 him to do it, as it appears to him he would be going to a certain defeat unless by these light experiences he first removes that terror which the reputation of the enemy may have placed in their hearts. When Valerius Corvinus was sent by the Romans with the armies against the Samnites, who were new enemies, and in the past had never had a test of arms against each other, he made the Romans engage the Samnites in some skirmishes, where as Titus Livius says: Neither a new war or a new enemy should make them fear. None the less, there is a very great danger that if your soldiers are defeated in those slight battles, their fear and apprehension5 will increase, and that the opposite effects will ensue from what you designed, that is, you may have discouraged them where you had planned to reassure6 them. So that this is one of those things which has evil so near the good, and are so joined together, that it is an easy thing to adopt one [course] believing to have taken the other.
Upon this I say, that a good Captain ought to see to it with all diligence, that nothing springs up which, by some accident, can discourage his army. And that which can begin to discourage is to begin to lose, and, therefore, he should guard against small combats and not permit them unless he can engage in them with the greatest advantages and certain hope of victory: he ought not to engage in guarding passes where he cannot employ all his army: he ought not to engage in guarding towns except those which, if lost, would of necessity cause his own ruin, and in those that he does guard so organize himself that if faced with the possibility of siege, he can with the guards and the army employ all his strength, and ought to leave the other places undefended: For whenever something is lost which is abandoned but the army remains7 intact, he neither loses reputation in the war nor the hope of winning it. But when something is lost which you had planned to defend, and everyone believed you would defend it, then there is damage as well as defeat, and you have almost, like the Gauls, lost the war through a matter of little moment. Philip of Macedonia, father of Perseus, a military man and of great renown8 in his times, having been assaulted by the Romans, abandoned and laid waste many of his territories which he judged he could not defend; for in his prudence9 he judged it would be more pernicious to lose his reputation by not being able to defend that which he set himself to defend, than by leaving it a prey10 to the enemy lose it as something neglected [and of no value]. The Romans, after the defeat at Cannae, when their affairs were afflicted11, refused aid to many of their allies and subjects, advising them to defend themselves as best they could. Which proceedings13 are much better than to undertake their defense14 and then not defending them: for in such a proceeding12 both friends and strength are lost, while in the other they lose only friends.
But to return to skirmishes, I say, that even if the Captain is constrained15 to engage in some because of the newness of the enemy, he ought to do so only with so much advantage on his side that there is no danger of losing; or certainly do as did Marius (which is the better proceeding) when going against the Cimbrians, a most ferocious16 people who came to plunder17 Italy; and their coming spread fear because of their numbers and ferocity and because of having already overcome one Roman army; and Marius judged it necessary, before coming to battle, to do something by which his army might lose that terror which fear of the enemy may have given them; and as a most prudent18 Captain, he placed his army several times in positions whence the Cimbri with their army should have to pass. And thus, he wanted his soldiers, from within the strongholds of his camp, to see and accustom19 their eyes to the sight of that enemy, so that seeing a disorganized multitude, encumbered20 with impediments, partly armed with useless weapons and partly without arms, they would be reassured21 and become desirous of the battle. Which proceeding, as it was wisely taken by Marius, so also should it be diligently22 imitated by others, so as not to incur23 those dangers which I have mentioned above, and not to have to do as the Gauls: who in fear from some small thing, retreated to the lands behind the Tiber and into Campania. And as we have cited Valerius Corvinus in this discourse24, I want (through the medium of his words) in the following chapter to show how a Captain ought to be constituted.
1 momentous | |
adj.重要的,重大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 condemned | |
adj. 被责难的, 被宣告有罪的 动词condemn的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 constrains | |
强迫( constrain的第三人称单数 ); 强使; 限制; 约束 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 apprehension | |
n.理解,领悟;逮捕,拘捕;忧虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 reassure | |
v.使放心,使消除疑虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 renown | |
n.声誉,名望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 prudence | |
n.谨慎,精明,节俭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 prey | |
n.被掠食者,牺牲者,掠食;v.捕食,掠夺,折磨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 afflicted | |
使受痛苦,折磨( afflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 proceeding | |
n.行动,进行,(pl.)会议录,学报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 proceedings | |
n.进程,过程,议程;诉讼(程序);公报 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 defense | |
n.防御,保卫;[pl.]防务工事;辩护,答辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 constrained | |
adj.束缚的,节制的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 ferocious | |
adj.凶猛的,残暴的,极度的,十分强烈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 plunder | |
vt.劫掠财物,掠夺;n.劫掠物,赃物;劫掠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 prudent | |
adj.谨慎的,有远见的,精打细算的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 accustom | |
vt.使适应,使习惯 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 encumbered | |
v.妨碍,阻碍,拖累( encumber的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 reassured | |
adj.使消除疑虑的;使放心的v.再保证,恢复信心( reassure的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 diligently | |
ad.industriously;carefully | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 incur | |
vt.招致,蒙受,遭遇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 discourse | |
n.论文,演说;谈话;话语;vi.讲述,著述 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |