May 6. . . . I do not find that the repetition of an important word a few times--say, three or four times--in a paragraph troubles my ear if clearness of meaning is best secured thereby2. But tautological3 repetition which has no justifying4 object, but merely exposes the fact that the writer's balance at the vocabulary bank has run short and that he is too lazy to replenish5 it from the thesaurus--that is another matter. It makes me feel like calling the writer to account. It makes me want to remind him that he is not treating himself and his calling with right respect, and, incidentally, that he is not treating me with proper reverence6. At breakfast, this morning, a member of the family read aloud an interesting review of a new book about Mr. Gladstone in which the reviewer used the strong adjective "delightful7" thirteen times. Thirteen times in a short review, not a long one. In five of the cases the word was distinctly the right one, the exact one, the best one our language can furnish, therefore it made no discord8; but in the remaining cases it was out of tune9. It sharped or flatted, one or the other, every time, and was as unpleasantly noticeable as is a false note in music. I looked in the thesaurus, and under a single head I found four words which would replace with true notes the false ones uttered by four of the misused10 "delightfuls"; and of course if I had hunted under related heads for an hour and made an exhaustive search I should have found right words, to a shade, wherewith to replace the remaining delinquents11.
I suppose we all have our foibles. I like the exact word, and clarity of statement, and here and there a touch of good grammar for picturesqueness12; but that reviewer cares for only the last mentioned of these things. His grammar is foolishly correct, offensively precise. It flaunts13 itself in the reader's face all along, and struts14 and smirks15 and shows off, and is in a dozen ways irritating and disagreeable. To be serious, I write good grammar myself, but not in that spirit, I am thankful to say. That is to say, my grammar is of a high order, though not at the top. Nobody's is. Perfect grammar--persistent, continuous, sustained--is the fourth dimension, so to speak; many have sought it, but none has found it. Even this reviewer, this purist, with all his godless airs, has made two or three slips. At least, I think he has. I am almost sure, by witness of my ear, but cannot be positive, for I know grammar by ear only, not by note, not by the rules. A generation ago I knew the rules--knew them by heart, word for word, though not their meanings--and I still know one of them: the one which says--which says--but never mind, it will come back to me presently. This reviewer even seems to know (or seems even to know, or seems to know even) how to put the word "even" in the right place; and the word "only," too. I do not like that kind of persons. I never knew one of them that came to any good. A person who is as self-righteous as that will do other things. I know this, because I have noticed it many a time. I would never hesitate to injure that kind of a man if I could. When a man works up his grammar to that altitude, it is a sign. It shows what he will do if he gets a chance; it shows the kind of disposition16 he has; I have noticed it often. I knew one once that did a lot of things. They stop at nothing.
But, anyway, this grammatical coxcomb's review is interesting, as I said before. And there is one sentence in it which tastes good in the mouth, so perfectly17 do the last five of its words report a something which we have all felt after sitting long over an absorbing book. The matter referred to is Mr. Gladstone's boswellized conversations and his felicitous18 handling of his subject.
One facet19 of the brilliant talker's mind flashes out on us after another till we tire with interest.
That is clearly stated. We recognize that feeling. In the morning paper I find a sentence of another breed.
There had been no death before the case of Cornelius Lean which had arisen and terminated in death since the special rules had been drawn20 up.
By the context I know what it means, but you are without that light and will be sure to get out of it a meaning which the writer of it was not intending to convey.
点击收听单词发音
1 tautology | |
n.无谓的重复;恒真命题 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 thereby | |
adv.因此,从而 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 tautological | |
adj.重复的;累赘的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 justifying | |
证明…有理( justify的现在分词 ); 为…辩护; 对…作出解释; 为…辩解(或辩护) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 replenish | |
vt.补充;(把…)装满;(再)填满 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 reverence | |
n.敬畏,尊敬,尊严;Reverence:对某些基督教神职人员的尊称;v.尊敬,敬畏,崇敬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 delightful | |
adj.令人高兴的,使人快乐的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 discord | |
n.不和,意见不合,争论,(音乐)不和谐 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 tune | |
n.调子;和谐,协调;v.调音,调节,调整 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 misused | |
v.使用…不当( misuse的过去式和过去分词 );把…派作不正当的用途;虐待;滥用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 delinquents | |
n.(尤指青少年)有过失的人,违法的人( delinquent的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 picturesqueness | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 flaunts | |
v.炫耀,夸耀( flaunt的第三人称单数 );有什么能耐就施展出来 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 struts | |
(框架的)支杆( strut的名词复数 ); 支柱; 趾高气扬的步态; (尤指跳舞或表演时)卖弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 smirks | |
n.傻笑,得意的笑( smirk的名词复数 )v.傻笑( smirk的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 disposition | |
n.性情,性格;意向,倾向;排列,部署 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 felicitous | |
adj.恰当的,巧妙的;n.恰当,贴切 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 facet | |
n.(问题等的)一个方面;(多面体的)面 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |