Seated around a table bedecked with roses, and with flasks12 of Chianti before them, the five continued their philosophic13 discourse14.
“It is quite true,” said Nicole Langelier, “that the heart fails in the case of many men, when gazing into the abyss of future events. It is moreover certain that our all too imperfect knowledge of facts past and gone does not supply us with the elements required to enable us to determine accurately15 what is to succeed them. However, since the past of human social organisations is in part known to us, the future of those societies, a continuation and consequence of their past, is not wholly beyond our ken17. It is not impossible to observe certain social phenomena18, and to define from the conditions under which they have already occurred, the conditions under which they will reappear. We are not barred, when witnessing the commencement of an order of facts, from comparing it with a past order of analogous19 facts, and from deducing from the completion of the second a like completion of the first. By way of example: when observing that the forms of labour are changeable, that serfdom has succeeded slavery, salaried labour, serfdom, new methods of production may be anticipated; when it is shown that industrial capital has for barely a century taken the place of the small artisans and peasant property, one is led to ponder over the form which is to succeed capital; when studying the manner in which was carried out the redemption of the feudal20 burdens and conditions of servitude, one is enabled to conceive how the redemption of the means of production nowadays constituting private ownership may some day be carried out. By studying the great Services of the State now in operation, it is possible to form a conception of future socialistic methods of production; and, after having thus investigated in several respects the present and the past of human industry, we shall, lacking certainties, determine by aid of probabilities whether collectivism is to be realised some day, not because it is just, for there is no reason for believing in the triumph of justice, but because it is the necessary sequel to the present state of things, and the fatal consequence of capitalistic evolution.
“Let us, if you like, take another example: we possess some experience of the life and death of religions. The end of Roman polytheism in particular, is familiar to us. Its lamentable22 end enables us to imagine that of Christianity, whose decline we are witnessing.
“I am curious to learn,” said Joséphin Leclerc, “how to set about it.”
M. Goubin shook his head, saying:
“Such a quest is useless. We know its result beforehand. War will last as long as the world.”
“There is nothing to prove it,” replied Langelier, “and a consideration of the past leads one to believe, on the contrary, that war is not one of the essential conditions of social life.”
And Langelier, while waiting for the minestra (soup) which was long in making its appearance, developed the foregoing idea, without, however, departing from the moderation characterising his mind.
“Although the early periods of the human race,” he said, “are lost to us in impenetrable darkness, it is certain that men were not always warlike. They were not so during the long ages of the pastoral life; the memory of which survives only in a small number of words common to all Indo-European languages, and which reveal innocent manners. And there are reasons for believing that these peaceful pastoral centuries had a far longer duration than the agricultural, industrial, and commercial periods which, following them in a necessary progress, brought about between tribes and nations a state of all but constant war.
“It was by force of arms that it was most frequently sought to acquire property, lands, women, slaves, and cattle. At first, wars were waged between village and village. Next, the vanquished26, joining hands with the victors, formed a nation, and wars occurred between nation and nation. Each of these peoples, in order to retain possession of the acquired riches, or to make further acquisitions, contended with neighbouring peoples for the possession of strongholds securing the command of roads, mountain passes, river courses, and the seashore. In the end, nations formed confederations, and contracted alliances. Thus it came about that men banded together; as they increased in strength, instead of contending for the goods of the earth, formally bartered27 them. The community of sentiments and interests gradually became broadened. A day came when Rome imagined she had established it the world over. Augustus thought he had inaugurated the era of universal peace.
“We know how this illusion was gradually and savagely29 dissipated, and how the barbarian30 hordes31 overwhelmed the Roman peace. These barbarians32, who had settled within the Empire, cut one another’s throats on its ruins, for a space of fourteen centuries, and founded in carnage countries baptized in blood. Of such was the life of nations in the Middle Ages, and the constitution of the great European monarchies33.
“In those days, a state of war was alone possible and conceivable. All the forces of the world were organised solely35 for the purpose of maintaining it.
“If the reawakening of thought, at the time of the Renaissance37, permitted a few sparse38 minds to conceive better regulated relations between nations, at one and the same time, the burning desire to invent, and the thirst for knowledge supplied fresh food to the warrior39 instinct. The discovery of the West Indies, the exploration of Africa, the navigation of the Pacific Ocean, opened up vast territories to European avidity. The white kingdoms joined issue over the extermination40 of the red, yellow, and black races, and for the space of four centuries gave themselves up madly to the pillaging41 of three great divisions of the world. This is what is styled modern civilisation42.
“During this uninterrupted succession of deeds of rapine and violence, Europeans acquired a knowledge of the extent and configuration43 of the earth. As they progressed in this knowledge, so did their work of destruction proceed apace. To the present day, the whites come in contact with the black or the yellow races but to enslave or massacre44 them. The peoples whom we call barbarians know us so far through our crimes only.
“For all that, those navigations, those explorations undertaken in a spirit of savage28 cupidity45, these tracks by land and by sea opened up to conquerors46, adventurers, hunters of and traders in men, these life-destroying colonisations, this brutal47 impulse which has led and still leads one-half of humanity to destroy the other, are the fatal conditions of a further progress of civilisation, and the terrible means which shall have prepared, for a still undetermined future, the peace of the world.
“This time, ’tis the whole world assimilated, in spite of enormous dissimilarities, to the state of the Roman Empire under Augustus. The Roman peace was the fruit of conquest. Universal peace will most assuredly not be brought about by the same means. No Empire is there to-day which can lay claim to the hegemony of the lands and seas covering the globe, known and surveyed at last. But, in spite of their being less apparent than those of political and military domination, the bonds which are beginning to unite the whole of humanity, and no longer merely a part of humanity, are none the less real; they are both more supple49 and more solid, more intimate and infinite in variety, since they are connected, athwart the fictions of public life, with the realities of social life.
“The increasing multiplicity of communications and exchanges, the compulsory50 solidarity51 of the financial markets of every capital, of commercial markets vainly striving to guarantee their independence by recourse to unfortunate expedients52, the rapid growth of international socialism, seem likely to guarantee, sooner or later, the union of the peoples of every continent. If at the present moment the Imperialist spirit of the great States and the haughty53 ambitions of armed nations seem to give the lie to these previsions, and to damn these aspirations54, it will be perceived that in reality modern nationalism amounts merely to a confused aspiration55 towards a more and more vast union of intellects and wills, and that the dream of a greater England, a greater Germany, a greater America, leads, will or do whatever you may, to the dream of a greater humanity, and to a partnership56 between nations for the common exploitation of the riches of the earth....”
The speech was interrupted by the appearance of the tavern-keeper bearing a steaming soup-tureen and grated cheese.
And, from amid the hot and aromatic57 vapour of the soup, Nicole Langelier concluded his argument with these words:
“There will doubtless be further wars. The savage instincts coupled with the natural desires, pride and hunger, which have embroiled58 the world for so many centuries, will again disturb it. The human masses have so far not found their equilibrium59. The sagacity of nations is not yet sufficiently60 methodical to secure the common welfare, by means of the freedom and the facility of exchanges, man has so far not come to be looked up to with respect everywhere by man, the several portions of humanity are not yet about to associate harmoniously61 for the purpose of building the cells and organs of one and the same body. It will not be vouchsafed62 even unto the youngest of us to witness the close of the era of arms. But, we feel within us a presentiment63 of these better times which we are not to experience. If we extend into the future the present trend, we may even now determine the establishment of more perfect and frequent communications between all races and all nations, a more general and stronger feeling of human solidarity, the rational organisation16 of labour, and the coming of the United States of the World.
“Universal peace will become a fact some day, not because men will become better (’tis more than we may hope for), but because a new order of things, a new science, and new economic necessities will force on men the state of peace, just as formerly64 the very conditions of their existence placed and kept them in a state of war.”
“Nicole Langelier, a rose has shed a leaf in your glass,” said Giacomo Boni. “This has not taken place without the permission of the gods. Let us drink to the future peace of the world.”
Raising his glass, Joséphin Leclerc remarked:
“This wine of Chianti has a tart65 savour, and a light sparkle. Let us drink to peace, the while Russians and Japanese are waging a bitter war in Manchuria and in Korea Bay.”
“That war,” resumed Langelier, “marks one of the great periods in the history of the world. And, in order to grasp its meaning, we must hark back two thousand years.
“The Romans, assuredly, did not suspect the vastness of the barbarian world, and had no conception of those immense human reservoirs which were to burst on them one fine day, and submerge them. They did not suspect that there existed in the world any other than the Roman peace. And yet, an older and vaster one there was, the Chinese peace.
“Not but what their merchants had business relations with the merchants of Serica. The latter were wont66 to bring raw silk to a spot situated67 to the north of the Pamir table-land, named the Tower of Stone. The merchants of the Empire went thither68. Bolder Latin traders penetrated69 as far as the Gulf70 of Tong-King and the Chinese coasts up to Hang-chau-fu, or Hanoi. Nevertheless, the Romans did not conceive that Serica constituted an Empire more densely71 populated than their own one, richer, and more advanced in agriculture and political economy. The Chinese, on their part, knew the white men. Their annals mention the fact that the Emperor An-tung, under which name we recognise Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, despatched an embassy to them, which was perhaps merely an expedition of navigators and merchants. But they were ignorant of the fact that a civilisation more seething72 and violent than their own, as well as more prolific73 and infinitely74 more expansive, was spread over one of the faces of the globe of which they covered another face: the Chinese, agriculturists and gardeners full of experience, honest and expert merchants, led a happy life, owing to their system of exchange and to their immense associations of credit. Contented75 with their subtle science, their exquisite politeness, their singularly human piety76, and their immutable77 wisdom, they were doubtless not anxious to become acquainted with the ways of life and thought of the white men who had come from the land of C?sar. Perchance the ambassadors of An-tung may have seemed somewhat gross and barbarian to them.
“The two great civilisations, the yellow and the white, continued ignorant of each other until the day when the Portuguese78, having doubled the Cape79 of Good Hope, settled down to trade at Macao. Merchants and Christian23 missionaries80 established themselves in China, and indulged in every kind of violence and rapine. The Chinese tolerated them, in the manner of men accustomed to works of patience, and marvellously capable of endurance; nevertheless, they could on occasion take life with all the refinements81 of cruelty. For nearly three whole centuries the Jesuits were, in the Middle Kingdom, a source of endless disturbances82. In our own times, the Christian acquired the habit of sending jointly83 or separately into that vast Empire, whenever order was disturbed, soldiers who restored it by means of theft, rape84, pillage85, murder, and incendiarism, and of proceeding86 at short intervals87 with the pacific penetration88 of the country with rifles and guns. The poorly armed Chinese either defend themselves badly or not at all, and so they are massacred with delightful89 facility. They are polite and ceremonious, but are reproached with cherishing feeble sentiments of affection for Europeans. The grievances90 we have against them are greatly of the order of those which Mr. Du Chaillu cherished towards his gorilla91. Mr. Du Chaillu, while in a forest, brought down with his rifle the mother of a gorilla. In its death, the brute92 was still pressing its young to its bosom93. He tore it from this embrace, and dragged it with him in a cage across Africa, for the purpose of selling it in Europe. Now, the young animal gave him just cause for complaint. It was unsociable, and actually starved itself to death. ‘I was powerless,’ says Mr. Du Chaillu, ‘to correct its evil nature.’ We complain of the Chinese with as great a show of reason as Mr. Du Chaillu of his gorilla.
“In 1901, order having been disturbed at Peking, the troops of the five Great Powers, under the command of a German Field-Marshal, restored it by the customary means. Having in this fashion covered themselves with military glory, the five Powers signed one of the innumerable treaties by which they guarantee the integrity of the very China whose provinces they divide among themselves.
“Russia’s share was Manchuria, and she closed Korea to Japanese trade. Japan, which in 1894 had beaten the Chinese on land and on sea, and had taken a part, in 1901, in the pacifying94 action of the Powers, saw with concentrated fury the advance of the voracious95 and slow-footed she-bear. And, while the huge brute indolently stretched out its muzzle96 towards the Japanese beehive, the yellow bees, arming their wings and stings together, riddled97 it with burning punctures98.
“‘It is a colonial war,’ was the expression used by a high-placed Russian official to my friend Georges Bourdon.[D] Now, the fundamental principal of every colonial war is that the European should be more powerful than the peoples whom he is fighting; this is as clear as noonday. It is understood that in these kinds of wars the European is to attack with artillery99, while the Asiatic or African is of course to defend himself with arrows, clubs, assegais and tomahawks. It is tolerated that he should procure100 a few antiquated101 flint-locks and cartridge-pouches; this aids in rendering102 colonisation more glorious. But in no case is it permissible103 that he should be armed and instructed in European fashion. His fleet must consist of junks, canoes and ‘dug-outs.’ Should he perchance purchase ships from European ship-owners, such ships shall naturally be unfit for use. The Chinese who fill their arsenals104 with porcelain105 shells conform to the rules of colonial warfare106.
[D] M. Georges Bourdon, journalist, on the staff of Le Figaro.
“The Japanese have departed from these rules. They wage war in accordance with the principles taught in France by General Bonnal. They greatly outweighed107 their adversaries108 in knowledge and intelligence. While fighting better than Europeans, they show no respect for consecrated109 usages, and act to a certain degree in a fashion contrary to the law of nations.
“’Tis in vain that serious individuals like Monsieur Edmond Théry[E] demonstrated to them that they were bound to be beaten, in the superior interest of the European market and in conformity110 with the most firmly established economic laws. Vainly did the proconsul of Indo-China, Monsieur Doumer himself, call upon them to suffer, and at short notice, decisive defeats on sea and on land. ‘What a financial sadness would bow down our hearts,’ exclaimed this great man, ‘were Bezobrazoff and Alexeieff not to extract another million out of the Korean forests. They are kings. Like them, I was a king: our cause is a common one. Oh ye Japanese! Imitate in their gentleness the copper-coloured folk over whom I reigned111 so gloriously under Méline.’ In vain did Dr. Charles Richet,[F] skeleton in hand, represent to them that being prognathous, and not having the muscles of their calves112 sufficiently developed, they were under the obligation of seeking flight in the trees when face to face with the Russians, who are brachycephalous and as such eminently113 civilising, as was demonstrated when they drowned five thousand Chinese in the Amur. ‘Bear in mind that you are links between monkey and man,’ obligingly said to them my Lord Professor Richet, ‘as a consequence of which, if you should defeat the Russians or Finno-Letto-Ugro-Slavs, it would be exactly as if monkeys were to beat you. Is it not plain to you?’ They heeded114 him not.
[E] M. Edmond Théry, journalist, on the staff of Le Figaro. Has been entrusted115 by the French Government with several politico-economic missions; author of several works in this connection.
[F] Dr. Charles Richet, a noted116 physician, who has written plays, and is the author of several works on physiology117 and sociology.
“At the present moment, the Russians are paying the penalty, in the waters of Japan and in the gorges118 of Manchuria, not only of their grasping and brutal policy in the East, but of the colonial policy of all Europe. They are now expiating119, not merely their own crimes, but those of the whole of military and commercial Christianity. When saying this, I do not mean to say that there is a justice in the world. But we witness a strange whirligig of things, and brute force, up to now the sole judge of human actions, indulges occasionally in unexpected pranks120. Its sudden starts aside destroy an equilibrium thought to be stable. And its pranks, which are ever the work of some hidden rule, bring about interesting results. The Japanese cross the Yalu and defeat the Russians in good form. Their sailors annihilate121 artistically122 a European fleet. Immediately do we discern that a danger threatens us. If it indeed exists, who created it? It was not the Japanese who sought out the Russians. It was not the yellow men who hunted up the whites. We there and then make the discovery of a Yellow Peril123. For many long years have Asiatics been familiar with the White Peril. The looting of the Summer Palace, the massacres124 of Pekin, the drownings of Blagovestchenk, the dismemberment of China, were these not enough to alarm the Chinese? As to the Japanese, could they feel secure under the guns of Port Arthur? We created the White Peril. The White Peril has engendered125 the Yellow Peril. We have here concatenations giving to the ancient Necessity which rules the world an appearance of divine Justice, and must perforce admire the astonishing behaviour of that blind queen of men and gods, when seeing Japan, formerly so cruel to the Chinese and Koreans, and the unpaid126 accessory to the crimes of Europeans in China, become the avenger127 of China, and the hope of the yellow race.
“It does not, however, appear at first sight that the Yellow Peril at which European economists128 are terrified is to be compared to the White Peril suspended over Asia. The Chinese do not send to Paris, Berlin, and St. Petersburg missionaries to teach Christians129 the Fung-chui, and sow disorder130 in European affairs. A Chinese expeditionary force did not land in Quiberon Bay to demand of the Government of the Republic extra-territoriality, i.e., the right of trying by a tribunal of mandarins cases pending131 between Chinese and Europeans. Admiral Togo did not come and bombard Brest roads with a dozen battleships, for the purpose of improving Japanese trade in France. The flower of French nationalism, the élite of our Trublions, did not besiege132 in their mansions133 in the Avenues Hoche and Marceau the Legations of China and of Japan, and Marshal Oyama did not, for the same reason, lead the combined armies of the Far East to the Boulevard de la Madeleine to demand the punishment of the foreigner-hating Trublions. He did not burn Versailles in the name of a higher civilisation. The armies of the Great Asiatic Powers did not carry away to Tokio and Peking the Louvre paintings and the silver service of the Elysée.
“No indeed! Monsieur Edmond Théry himself admits that the yellow men are not sufficiently civilised to imitate the whites so faithfully. Nor does he foresee that they will ever rise to so high a moral culture. How could it be possible for them to possess our virtues135? They are not Christians. But men entitled to speak consider that the Yellow Peril is none the less to be dreaded136 for all that it is economic. Japan, and China organised by Japan, threaten us, in all the markets of Europe, with a competition frightful137, monstrous138, enormous, and deformed139, the mere48 idea of which causes the hair of the economists to stand on end. That is why Japanese and Chinese must be exterminated141. There can be no doubt about the matter. But war must also be declared against the United States to prevent it from selling iron and steel at a lower price than our manufacturers less well equipped in machinery142.
“Let us for once admit the truth, and for a moment cease flattering ourselves. Old Europe and new Europe—for that is America’s true name—have inaugurated economic war. Each and every nation is waging an industrial struggle against the others. Everywhere does production arm itself furiously against production. We are displaying bad grace when we complain that we are witnessing fresh competing and disturbing products invade the market of the world thus thrown into confusion. Of what use are our lamentations? That might is right is our god. If Tokio is the weaker, it shall be in the wrong and it shall be made to feel it; if it is the stronger, right will be on its side, and we shall have no reproach to cast at it. Where is the nation in the world entitled to speak in the name of justice?
“We have taught the Japanese both the capitalistic régime and war. They are a cause of alarm because they are becoming like ourselves. In truth, it is awful. They dare to defend themselves with European weapons against Europeans. Their generals, their naval143 officers, who have studied in England, in Germany, and in France, reflect honour on their instructors144. Several of them have followed the classes of our special military schools. The Russian Grand Dukes, who feared that no good could come out of military institutions too democratic to their taste, must feel reassured145.
“I am unable to foretell146 the issue of the war. The Russian Empire opposes to the methodical energy of the Japanese its irresolute147 forces which the savage imbecility of its government restrains, the dishonesty of a voracious administration robs, and military incapacity leads to disaster. The stupendousness of its impotence and the depths of its disorganisation stand revealed. Withal, its golden reservoirs, kept filled by its rich creditors148, are all but inexhaustible. On the other hand, its enemy has no other resources than onerous149 loans obtained with difficulty, of which victory itself may perchance deprive them. For while English and Americans are one in assisting it to weaken Russia, they do not intend that it shall become powerful and to be feared. It is hard to predict the final victory of one combatant over the other. But if Japan makes the yellow men respected by the white men, it will have greatly served the cause of humanity, and paved the way unawares and doubtless against its own wish for the pacific organisation of the world.”
“What do you mean,” said M. Goubin, raising his eyes from his plate filled with a savoury fritto.
“It is feared,” continued Nicole Langelier, “that Japan grown to manhood will educate China, teach it to defend itself and to exploit its wealth itself, and that Japan will create a strong China. No need to look upon such a contingency151 with alarm; it should, on the contrary, be hoped for in the universal interest. Strong nations co-operate to the harmony and wealth of the world. Weak nations, like China and Turkey, are a perpetual cause of disturbances and perils152. But we are ever in too great a haste in our fears and hopes. Should victorious153 Japan undertake to organise34 the old yellow Empire, it will not succeed in its task that quickly. It will require time to teach China that a China exists. For she knows it not, and as long as she is unaware150 of it, there will not be any China. A people exists only in the knowledge possessed154 by it of its existence. There are 350,000,000 Chinese, but they are not aware of the fact. As long as they have not counted themselves, they will not count for anything. They will not even exist by dint155 of numbers. ‘Number off!’ is the first word of command spoken by the drill-sergeant to his men. He is there and then teaching them the principle of societies. But it takes a long time for 350,000,000 men to number themselves. Nevertheless, Ular, who is a European out of the common, since he believes that one should be humane156 and just towards the Chinese, informs us that a great national movement is simmering in all the provinces of the huge empire.”
“And even should it happen,” said Joséphin Leclerc, “that victorious Japan came to infuse into Mongols, Chinese, and Tibetans a consciousness of themselves, and caused them to be respected by the white races, in what way would the peace of the world be better assured, and the conquering mania157 of nations be kept within stricter bounds? Would not negro humanity still remain to be exterminated? Where is the black nation which will insure the respecting of negroes by the white and yellow races?”
“But,” interposed Nicole Langelier, “who can define how far one of the great human races may go? The blacks are not, like the red man, dying out through contact with the Europeans. Where is the prophet who will venture to tell the 200,000,000 African blacks that their posterity158 will never enjoy wealth and peace on the lakes and great rivers? The white men passed through the ages of caves and lacustrine villages. They were at that time wild and naked. They dried rude potteries159 in the sun. Their chiefs led barbarian dances at which they shouted. They knew no other sciences than those of their sorcerers. Since those days they have built the Parthenon, conceived geometry, subjected the expression of their thought and the motions of their body to the laws of harmony.
“Are you then going to say to the African negroes: ‘You shall for ever carry on an internecine160 war between tribe and tribe, and you shall inflict161 upon one another atrocities162 and absurd tortures; King Gléglé, permeated163 with a religious idea, shall for all time have prisoners tied up in a basket and thrown from the roof of his royal hut; you shall for ever devour164 with enjoyment165 the strips of flesh torn from the decomposed166 cadavers167 of your aged25 relations; for ever shall explorers unload their rifles on you, and smoke you out in your kraals; the wonderful Christian soldier will enjoy in his bravery the amusement of hacking168 your women to pieces; the gay and festive169 sailor from the befogged seas shall for all time kick in the bellies170 of your little children, just to take the stiffness out of his knee-joints? Can you safely prophesy171 to one-third of humanity a state of perpetual ignominy?
“I am unable to say whether one day, as Mrs. Beecher Stowe predicted in 1840, a life will awaken36 in Africa full of a splendour and magnificence unknown to the cold-blooded races of the West, and whether art will blossom forth172 in new and dazzling forms. The blacks possess a keen appreciation173 of music. It may happen that a delightful negro art of dance and song shall see the light of day. In the meanwhile, the coloured folk of the Southern States are making rapid strides in capitalistic civilisation. Monsieur Jean Finot[G] has recently supplied us with information on the subject.
[G] M. Jean Finot, editor of La Revue, and contributor to several French and European publications.
“Fifty years ago they did not, as a whole, own two hundred and fifty acres of land. Nowadays their property is valued at over ￡160,000,000. They were illiterate174. To-day fifty per cent. of them can read and write. There are black novelists, poets, economists, and philanthropists.
“The half-breeds, the issue of master and slave, are singularly intelligent and vigorous. The coloured men, both cunning and ferocious175, instinctive176 and calculating, will gradually (so one of them has confided177 to me) reap the advantage of number, and one day lord it over the effeminate creole race which exercises so lightly over the blacks its fitful cruelty. It may be that the mulatto of genius, who will make the children of the whites pay dearly the blood of the negroes lynched by their fathers, is already born.”
M. Goubin primed himself with his powerful eye-glass, and remarked:
“Were the Japanese to be victorious, they would take Indo-China from us.”
M. Goubin’s indignant silence was his sole reply.
“I cannot listen to such statements,” exclaimed Joséphin Leclerc. “We require outlets179 for our products, and territories for our industrial and commercial expansion. What are you thinking of, Langelier? One policy alone governs Europe, America, and the world to-day—colonial policy.”
Nicole Langelier, unruffled, replied:
“Colonial policy is the most recent form of barbarism, or, if you prefer, the term of civilisation. I make no distinction between these two expressions; they are identical. What men call civilisation is the present condition of manners, while what they style barbarism are anterior180 conditions. The manners of to-day will be styled barbarian when they shall be of the past. It is patent to me that our manners and morals embody181 the idea that strong nations shall destroy the weaker ones. Of such is the principle of the law of nations.
“It remains182 to be seen, however, whether conquests abroad always constitute a good stroke of business for nations. It would not seem so. What have Mexico and Peru done for Spain? Brazil for Portugal? Batavia for Holland? There are various kinds of colonies. There are colonies which afford to unfortunate Europeans desert and uncultivated lands. These, loyal as long as they remain poor, separate from the mother country as soon as they become prosperous. Some there are which are inhabitable; these supply raw material, and import manufactured goods. Now it is plain that these colonies enrich, not those who govern them, but whoever trades with them. The greater part of the time they are not worth what they cost. Moreover, they may at any moment expose the mother country to military disasters.”
“How about England?” interrupted M. Goubin.
“England is less a nation than a race. The Anglo-Saxons know no fatherland but the sea. England, looked upon as wealthy in her vast domains184, owes her fortune and her power to her commerce. It is not her colonies which should be envied her, but her merchants, the authors of her wealth. Do you imagine, by way of illustration, that the Transvaal represents so very good a stroke of business for her? For all that, it is conceivable that in the present state of the world nations who bring forth many children and manufacture products in large quantities should seek territories and markets in far-off lands, and secure possession of them by stratagem185 and violence. How different it is in our own case! Our thrifty186 nation, careful not to have more children than the natal187 soil can feed without difficulty, and producing in a moderate degree, does not willingly embark188 on distant adventures; our France, who hardly goes beyond her garden wall, great heavens, what need has she of colonies? Of what use are they to her? What do they bring her? She has spent men and money in profusion189, in order that the Congo, Cochin-China, Annam, Tonking, Guiana, and Madagascar shall purchase calicoes from Manchester, guns from Birmingham and Liége, brandies from Dantzig, and cases of wine all the way from Bordeaux to Hamburg. She has, for seventy years, despoiled190, hunted, and shot down Arabs, and in the end she has peopled Algeria with Italians and Spaniards!
“The irony191 of these results is cruel enough, and it is hard to realise that this empire, ten or eleven times as big as France herself, has been formed to our detriment192. But, it must be taken into consideration that whereas the French nation derives193 no advantage whatsoever195 from the possession of territories in Africa and Asia, the heads of its Government, on the other hand, find it to their great advantage to acquire them. They thereby secure the affection of the navy and army, which on the occasion of colonial expeditions reap a harvest of promotions196, pensions, and crosses, to say nothing of the glory won in defeating the enemy. They conciliate the clergy197 by opening new paths to the Propaganda, and by allocating198 territories to Catholic missions. They make joyous199 the ship-owners, builders, and army contractors200, whom they load with orders. They secure for themselves in the country itself a numerous following by the granting of concessions201 of immense forests and plantations202 without end. And, what is still more precious to them, they attach to their majority every parliamentary jobber203 and kerbstone-broker. Lastly, they cajole the multitude, proud in its possession of a yellow and black empire, which makes Germany and England turn green with envy. They are looked upon as good citizens, patriots204, and great statesmen. And if, like Ferry, they incur205 the risk of going under, as the result of some military disaster, they willingly run the risk fully134 convinced that the most harmful of distant expeditions will cost them fewer difficulties, and will inveigle206 them into fewer perils than the most useful of social reforms.
“You can now realise why we have occasionally had imperialist ministers, jealous of aggrandising our colonial domain183. We must congratulate ourselves, however, and praise the moderation of our rulers, who might have burdened us with still more colonies.
“But all danger has not been averted207, and we are threatened with an eighty years’ warfare in Morocco. Is there never to be an end to the colonial mania?
“I am fully aware that nations are not sensible. How can it be expected of them, if one considers what they are made of? Still, a certain instinct oftentimes warns them of what is harmful. They are occasionally endowed with the power of observing. In the long run they undergo the painful experience of their errors and blunders. The day will come when it will dawn upon them that colonies are a source of perils and ruinous results. Commercial barbarism will be followed by commercial civilisation, and forcible, by pacific penetration. These ideas have to-day found an echo even in the bosom of parliaments. They will prevail, not because men will be more disinterested208, but because they will know their own interests better.
“The great human asset is man himself. In order to rate the terrestrial globe, it is necessary to begin by rating men. To exploit the soil, the mines, the waters, all the substances and all the forces of our planet, it needs man, the whole of man; humanity, the whole of humanity. The complete exploitation of the terrestrial globe demands the united labour of white, yellow, and black men. By reducing, diminishing, and weakening, or, to sum it up in one word, by colonising a portion of humanity, we are working against ourselves. It is to our advantage that yellow and black men should be powerful, free, and wealthy. Our prosperity and our wealth depend on theirs. The more is produced, the more will there be consumed. The greater the profit they derive194 from us, the greater the profit we shall derive from them. If they reap the benefit of our labours, so shall we fully reap theirs.
“If we study the movements which govern the destinies of societies, we may perhaps discover signs that the era of violent deeds is coming to an end. War, which was formerly a standing institution among nations, is now intermittent209, and the periods of peace have become of longer duration than those of war. Our country affords the observations of a fact full of interest, for the French nation presents an original characteristic in the military history of nations. Whereas other nations never waged war except from interest or necessity, alone the French have fought for the pleasure of fighting. Now it is remarkable210 that the taste of our compatriots has undergone a change. Thirty years ago Renan wrote: ‘Whoever knows France as a whole and in her provincial211 varieties will not hesitate to recognise the fact that the movement swaying this country for the past fifty years is essentially212 pacific.’ It is a fact attested213 by a large number of observers that in 1870 France had no desire to have recourse to the arbitrament of war, and that the declaration of war was greeted with consternation214. It is an assured fact that few Frenchmen dream of taking the field, and that everybody readily accepts the idea that the army exists in order to avoid a war. Let me quote one example out of a thousand in confirmation215 of this state of mind. Monsieur Ribot, a representative of the people and a former Cabinet Minister, having been invited to some patriotic216 celebration, replied with an eloquent217 letter, begging to be excused. The same Monsieur Ribot knits his brows superciliously218 at the mere mention of the word disarmament. He has towards standards and cannon219 the leaning proper to a former Minister of Foreign Affairs. In his letter he denounces as a national peril the pacific ideas disseminated220 by the Socialist21. He sees in them a spirit of renunciation he cannot endure. Not that he is of a bellicose turn of mind. He, too, sighs for peace, but a peace full of pomp, magnificent, and flashing with the same pride as war. Between Monsieur Ribot and Jaurès, the matter is merely one of form. Both of them are for peace. Jaurès, simply; Monsieur Ribot, superbly. That is all. Better still and more surely than the Socialist democracy which contents itself with a bloused or coated peace does the sentiment of the bourgeois221, who demand a peace gleaming with military insignia and bedecked with emblems222 of glory, testify to the inevitable223 decline of all idea of revenge and conquests, since one discerns in it the military instinct, at the very time when it is losing its nature and is becoming pacific.
“France is acquiring by degrees the sentiment of her true strength, consisting in intellectual strength; she is becoming conscious of her mission, which is the sowing of ideas and the exercise of a sway over thought. She will within measurable time perceive that her only stable power has lain in her speakers, her writers, and her men of science. Hence she will some day fain have to recognise that the force of numbers, after having so often betrayed her, is finally escaping from her, and that the time has come for her to resign herself to the glory which the exercise of the mind and the use of reason assure her of.”
Jean Boilly, shaking his head, said:
“You ask that France should teach other nations concord224 and peace. Are you so sure that she will be listened to and her example followed? Is her own tranquillity225 so assured? Has she not to fear threats from outside, to foresee dangers, to watch over her safety, and to provide for her defence? One swallow does not make a summer; one nation does not make the peace of the world. Is it so sure that Germany keeps up an army with the sole object of not waging war? Her Social-Democrats desire peace. But they are not the masters, and their deputies do not enjoy in the Parliament the authority which the number of their electors should give them. And Russia, who has hardly entered upon the industrial period, do you believe that she will soon be entering upon the pacific period? Is it not to be feared that after having disturbed Asia she will disturb Europe?
“Supposing even that Europe should become pacific, can you not see that America would become warlike? Following upon Cuba, reduced to the state of a vassal226 republic, Hawaii, Porto Rico, and the annexation227 of the Philippines, it is impossible to say that the American union is not a conquering nation. A publicist of Yankee proclivities228, Stead, has said amid the plaudits of the whole of the United States: ‘The Americanisation of the world is on the march.’ And then there is Mr. Roosevelt, whose dream is to plant the Stars and Stripes in South Africa, Australia, and the West Indies. Mr. Roosevelt is Imperialist and he sighs for an America mistress of the world. Between ourselves, he is planning the Empire of Augustus. He has unfortunately perused229 Livy. The conquests of the Romans banish230 sleep from him. Have you read his speeches? They breathe a bellicose spirit. ‘Fight, my friends,’ says Mr. Roosevelt, ‘and fight hard. There is nothing like blows. We are upon earth only to exterminate140 one another. Those who tell you the contrary are men without morality. Mistrust men who think. Thought enervates231. ’Tis a French failing. The Romans conquered the world. They lost it. We are the modern Romans.’ Words full of eloquence232, backed up with a navy which will soon be the second in the world, and with a military Budget of 40,500,000 francs!
“The Yankees declare that in four years’ time they will fight Germany. If we are to believe this, they should first tell us where they expect to come into contact with the enemy. That a Russia, the serf of her Czar, that a still feudal Germany, should entertain armies for fighting purposes, this one is tempted233 to lay to the door of ancient habits and the survival of a strenuous234 past. But that a young democracy, the United States of America, an aggregation235 of business men, a mass of emigrants236 from all countries, lacking community, traditions, and memories, madly cast into the scramble237 for the mighty238 dollar, should of a sudden be swept with the desire of firing torpedoes239 at the flanks of battleships, and of exploding mines under the enemy’s columns, affords a proof that the inordinate240 struggle for the production and exploitation of riches keeps alive the employment of and taste for brutal force, that industrial violence engenders241 military violence, and that mercantile rivalries242 kindle243 between nations hatreds244 that bloodshed can alone extinguish. The colonial mania of which you were speaking a while ago is but one of the thousand forms of the much-vaunted competition of our economists. The capitalistic state is just as much a warlike one as the feudal. The era has dawned of great wars for the industrial sovereignty. Under the present régime of national production it is the cannon which fixes tariffs245, establishes customs, opens and closes markets. There exists no other regulator of commerce and industry. Extermination is the fatal result of the economic conditions in which the civilised world finds itself to-day....”
The perfume of Gorgonzola and Stracchino was pervading246 the table. The waiter was bringing in wax-candles to each of which was attached the abbrustolatoio[H] wherewith to light the long cigars with straws, so dear to Italians.
[H] Abbrustolatoio—apparatus attached to the candle; it has two rings through which the cigar is placed, and left to burn awhile.
Hippolyte Dufresne, who for some time past seemed to have remained indifferent to the conversation, here remarked in a low tone tinged247 with an ostentatious modesty248:
“Gentlemen, our friend Langelier was asserting just now that many men are afraid of disgracing themselves in the eyes of their contemporaries by assuming the horrible immorality249 which is to be the morality of the future. I do not entertain a like fear, and I have written a little tale, which has perhaps no other merit than the one of revealing my calmness of mind when considering the future. I shall one day crave250 permission to read it to you.”
“You will be giving us pleasure,” added Joséphin Leclerc, Nicole Langelier, and M. Goubin.
“I am not sure whether I have the manuscript with me,” replied Hippolyte Dufresne.
With these words, he drew out of his pocket a roll of paper, and began to read what follows.
点击
收听单词发音
收听单词发音 |
1
lithographs
|
|
| n.平版印刷品( lithograph的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
supreme
|
|
| adj.极度的，最重要的；至高的，最高的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
testimony
|
|
| n.证词；见证，证明 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
juxtapositions
|
|
| n.并置，并列( juxtaposition的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
exquisite
|
|
| adj.精美的；敏锐的；剧烈的，感觉强烈的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
laden
|
|
| adj.装满了的；充满了的；负了重担的；苦恼的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
alabaster
|
|
| adj.雪白的；n.雪花石膏；条纹大理石 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
goblets
|
|
| n.高脚酒杯( goblet的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
affected
|
|
| adj.不自然的，假装的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
standing
|
|
| n.持续，地位；adj.永久的，不动的，直立的，不流动的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
renown
|
|
| n.声誉，名望 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
flasks
|
|
| n.瓶，长颈瓶， 烧瓶( flask的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
philosophic
|
|
| adj.哲学的，贤明的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
discourse
|
|
| n.论文，演说；谈话；话语；vi.讲述，著述 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
accurately
|
|
| adv.准确地，精确地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
organisation
|
|
| n.组织，安排，团体，有机休 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
ken
|
|
| n.视野，知识领域 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
18
phenomena
|
|
| n.现象 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
19
analogous
|
|
| adj.相似的；类似的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
20
feudal
|
|
| adj.封建的，封地的，领地的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
21
socialist
|
|
| n.社会主义者；adj.社会主义的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
22
lamentable
|
|
| adj.令人惋惜的，悔恨的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
23
Christian
|
|
| adj.基督教徒的；n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
24
bellicose
|
|
| adj.好战的；好争吵的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
25
aged
|
|
| adj.年老的，陈年的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
26
vanquished
|
|
| v.征服( vanquish的过去式和过去分词 )；战胜；克服；抑制 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
27
bartered
|
|
| v.作物物交换，以货换货( barter的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
28
savage
|
|
| adj.野蛮的；凶恶的，残暴的；n.未开化的人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
29
savagely
|
|
| adv. 野蛮地，残酷地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
30
barbarian
|
|
| n.野蛮人；adj.野蛮(人)的；未开化的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
31
hordes
|
|
| n.移动着的一大群( horde的名词复数 )；部落 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
32
barbarians
|
|
| n.野蛮人( barbarian的名词复数 )；外国人；粗野的人；无教养的人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
33
monarchies
|
|
| n. 君主政体, 君主国, 君主政治 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
34
organise
|
|
| vt.组织，安排，筹办 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
35
solely
|
|
| adv.仅仅，唯一地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
36
awaken
|
|
| vi.醒，觉醒；vt.唤醒，使觉醒，唤起，激起 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
37
renaissance
|
|
| n.复活，复兴，文艺复兴 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
38
sparse
|
|
| adj.稀疏的，稀稀落落的，薄的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
39
warrior
|
|
| n.勇士，武士，斗士 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
40
extermination
|
|
| n.消灭，根绝 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
41
pillaging
|
|
| v.抢劫，掠夺( pillage的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
42
civilisation
|
|
| n.文明，文化，开化，教化 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
43
configuration
|
|
| n.结构，布局，形态，(计算机)配置 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
44
massacre
|
|
| n.残杀，大屠杀；v.残杀，集体屠杀 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
45
cupidity
|
|
| n.贪心，贪财 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
46
conquerors
|
|
| 征服者，占领者( conqueror的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
47
brutal
|
|
| adj.残忍的，野蛮的，不讲理的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
48
mere
|
|
| adj.纯粹的；仅仅，只不过 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
49
supple
|
|
| adj.柔软的，易弯的，逢迎的，顺从的，灵活的；vt.使柔软，使柔顺，使顺从；vi.变柔软，变柔顺 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
50
compulsory
|
|
| n.强制的，必修的；规定的，义务的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
51
solidarity
|
|
| n.团结；休戚相关 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
52
expedients
|
|
| n.应急有效的，权宜之计的( expedient的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
53
haughty
|
|
| adj.傲慢的，高傲的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
54
aspirations
|
|
| 强烈的愿望( aspiration的名词复数 )； 志向； 发送气音； 发 h 音 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
55
aspiration
|
|
| n.志向，志趣抱负；渴望；(语)送气音；吸出 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
56
partnership
|
|
| n.合作关系，伙伴关系 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
57
aromatic
|
|
| adj.芳香的，有香味的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
58
embroiled
|
|
| adj.卷入的；纠缠不清的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
59
equilibrium
|
|
| n.平衡，均衡，相称，均势，平静 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
60
sufficiently
|
|
| adv.足够地，充分地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
61
harmoniously
|
|
| 和谐地，调和地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
62
vouchsafed
|
|
| v.给予，赐予( vouchsafe的过去式和过去分词 )；允诺 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
63
presentiment
|
|
| n.预感，预觉 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
64
formerly
|
|
| adv.从前，以前 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
65
tart
|
|
| adj.酸的；尖酸的，刻薄的；n.果馅饼；淫妇 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
66
wont
|
|
| adj.习惯于；v.习惯；n.习惯 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
67
situated
|
|
| adj.坐落在...的，处于某种境地的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
68
thither
|
|
| adv.向那里；adj.在那边的，对岸的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
69
penetrated
|
|
| adj. 击穿的，鞭辟入里的 动词penetrate的过去式和过去分词形式 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
70
gulf
|
|
| n.海湾；深渊，鸿沟；分歧，隔阂 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
71
densely
|
|
| ad.密集地；浓厚地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
72
seething
|
|
| 沸腾的，火热的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
73
prolific
|
|
| adj.丰富的，大量的；多产的，富有创造力的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
74
infinitely
|
|
| adv.无限地，无穷地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
75
contented
|
|
| adj.满意的，安心的，知足的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
76
piety
|
|
| n.虔诚，虔敬 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
77
immutable
|
|
| adj.不可改变的，永恒的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
78
Portuguese
|
|
| n.葡萄牙人；葡萄牙语 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
79
cape
|
|
| n.海角，岬；披肩，短披风 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
80
missionaries
|
|
| n.传教士( missionary的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
81
refinements
|
|
| n.（生活）风雅；精炼( refinement的名词复数 )；改良品；细微的改良；优雅或高贵的动作 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
82
disturbances
|
|
| n.骚乱( disturbance的名词复数 )；打扰；困扰；障碍 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
83
jointly
|
|
| ad.联合地，共同地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
84
rape
|
|
| n.抢夺，掠夺，强奸；vt.掠夺，抢夺，强奸 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
85
pillage
|
|
| v.抢劫；掠夺；n.抢劫，掠夺；掠夺物 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
86
proceeding
|
|
| n.行动，进行，(pl.)会议录，学报 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
87
intervals
|
|
| n.[军事]间隔( interval的名词复数 )；间隔时间；[数学]区间；（戏剧、电影或音乐会的）幕间休息 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
88
penetration
|
|
| n.穿透，穿人，渗透 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
89
delightful
|
|
| adj.令人高兴的，使人快乐的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
90
grievances
|
|
| n.委屈( grievance的名词复数 )；苦衷；不满；牢骚 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
91
gorilla
|
|
| n.大猩猩，暴徒，打手 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
92
brute
|
|
| n.野兽，兽性 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
93
bosom
|
|
| n.胸，胸部；胸怀；内心；adj.亲密的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
94
pacifying
|
|
| 使（某人）安静( pacify的现在分词 )； 息怒； 抚慰； 在（有战争的地区、国家等）实现和平 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
95
voracious
|
|
| adj.狼吞虎咽的，贪婪的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
96
muzzle
|
|
| n.鼻口部；口套；枪(炮)口；vt.使缄默 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
97
riddled
|
|
| adj.布满的；充斥的；泛滥的v.解谜，出谜题(riddle的过去分词形式) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
98
punctures
|
|
| n.（尖物刺成的）小孔( puncture的名词复数 )；（尤指）轮胎穿孔；（尤指皮肤上被刺破的）扎孔；刺伤v.在（某物）上穿孔( puncture的第三人称单数 )；刺穿（某物）；削弱（某人的傲气、信心等）；泄某人的气 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
99
artillery
|
|
| n.(军)火炮，大炮；炮兵(部队) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
100
procure
|
|
| vt.获得，取得，促成；vi.拉皮条 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
101
antiquated
|
|
| adj.陈旧的，过时的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
102
rendering
|
|
| n.表现，描写 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
103
permissible
|
|
| adj.可允许的，许可的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
104
arsenals
|
|
| n.兵工厂，军火库( arsenal的名词复数 )；任何事物的集成 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
105
porcelain
|
|
| n.瓷；adj.瓷的，瓷制的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
106
warfare
|
|
| n.战争(状态)；斗争；冲突 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
107
outweighed
|
|
| v.在重量上超过( outweigh的过去式和过去分词 )；在重要性或价值方面超过 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
108
adversaries
|
|
| n.对手，敌手( adversary的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
109
consecrated
|
|
| adj.神圣的，被视为神圣的v.把…奉为神圣，给…祝圣( consecrate的过去式和过去分词 )；奉献 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
110
conformity
|
|
| n.一致，遵从，顺从 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
111
reigned
|
|
| vi.当政，统治（reign的过去式形式） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
112
calves
|
|
| n.(calf的复数)笨拙的男子，腓；腿肚子( calf的名词复数 )；牛犊；腓；小腿肚v.生小牛( calve的第三人称单数 )；（冰川）崩解；生（小牛等），产（犊）；使（冰川）崩解 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
113
eminently
|
|
| adv.突出地；显著地；不寻常地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
114
heeded
|
|
| v.听某人的劝告，听从( heed的过去式和过去分词 )；变平，使（某物）变平( flatten的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
115
entrusted
|
|
| v.委托，托付( entrust的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
116
noted
|
|
| adj.著名的，知名的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
117
physiology
|
|
| n.生理学，生理机能 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
118
gorges
|
|
| n.山峡，峡谷( gorge的名词复数 )；咽喉v.（用食物把自己）塞饱，填饱( gorge的第三人称单数 )；作呕 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
119
expiating
|
|
| v.为（所犯罪过）接受惩罚，赎（罪）( expiate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
120
pranks
|
|
| n.玩笑，恶作剧( prank的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
121
annihilate
|
|
| v.使无效；毁灭；取消 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
122
artistically
|
|
| adv.艺术性地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
123
peril
|
|
| n.(严重的)危险；危险的事物 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
124
massacres
|
|
| 大屠杀( massacre的名词复数 )； 惨败 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
125
engendered
|
|
| v.产生（某形势或状况），造成，引起( engender的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
126
unpaid
|
|
| adj.未付款的，无报酬的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
127
avenger
|
|
| n. 复仇者 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
128
economists
|
|
| n.经济学家，经济专家( economist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
129
Christians
|
|
| n.基督教徒( Christian的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
130
disorder
|
|
| n.紊乱，混乱；骚动，骚乱；疾病，失调 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
131
pending
|
|
| prep.直到，等待…期间；adj.待定的；迫近的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
132
besiege
|
|
| vt.包围，围攻，拥在...周围 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
133
mansions
|
|
| n.宅第，公馆，大厦( mansion的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
134
fully
|
|
| adv.完全地，全部地，彻底地；充分地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
135
virtues
|
|
| 美德( virtue的名词复数 )； 德行； 优点； 长处 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
136
dreaded
|
|
| adj.令人畏惧的；害怕的v.害怕，恐惧，担心( dread的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
137
frightful
|
|
| adj.可怕的；讨厌的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
138
monstrous
|
|
| adj.巨大的；恐怖的；可耻的，丢脸的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
139
deformed
|
|
| adj.畸形的；变形的；丑的，破相了的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
140
exterminate
|
|
| v.扑灭，消灭，根绝 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
141
exterminated
|
|
| v.消灭，根绝( exterminate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
142
machinery
|
|
| n.(总称)机械，机器；机构 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
143
naval
|
|
| adj.海军的，军舰的，船的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
144
instructors
|
|
| 指导者，教师( instructor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
145
reassured
|
|
| adj.使消除疑虑的；使放心的v.再保证，恢复信心( reassure的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
146
foretell
|
|
| v.预言，预告，预示 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
147
irresolute
|
|
| adj.无决断的，优柔寡断的，踌躇不定的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
148
creditors
|
|
| n.债权人，债主( creditor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
149
onerous
|
|
| adj.繁重的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
150
unaware
|
|
| a.不知道的，未意识到的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
151
contingency
|
|
| n.意外事件，可能性 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
152
perils
|
|
| 极大危险( peril的名词复数 )； 危险的事（或环境） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
153
victorious
|
|
| adj.胜利的，得胜的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
154
possessed
|
|
| adj.疯狂的；拥有的，占有的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
155
dint
|
|
| n.由于，靠；凹坑 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
156
humane
|
|
| adj.人道的，富有同情心的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
157
mania
|
|
| n.疯狂；躁狂症，狂热，癖好 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
158
posterity
|
|
| n.后裔，子孙，后代 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
159
potteries
|
|
| n.陶器( pottery的名词复数 )；陶器厂；陶土；陶器制造（术） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
160
internecine
|
|
| adj.两败俱伤的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
161
inflict
|
|
| vt.(on)把…强加给，使遭受，使承担 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
162
atrocities
|
|
| n.邪恶，暴行( atrocity的名词复数 )；滔天大罪 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
163
permeated
|
|
| 弥漫( permeate的过去式和过去分词 )； 遍布； 渗入； 渗透 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
164
devour
|
|
| v.吞没；贪婪地注视或谛听，贪读；使着迷 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
165
enjoyment
|
|
| n.乐趣；享有；享用 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
166
decomposed
|
|
| 已分解的，已腐烂的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
167
cadavers
|
|
| n.尸体( cadaver的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
168
hacking
|
|
| n.非法访问计算机系统和数据库的活动 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
169
festive
|
|
| adj.欢宴的，节日的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
170
bellies
|
|
| n.肚子( belly的名词复数 )；腹部；（物体的）圆形或凸起部份；腹部…形的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
171
prophesy
|
|
| v.预言；预示 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
172
forth
|
|
| adv.向前；向外，往外 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
173
appreciation
|
|
| n.评价；欣赏；感谢；领会，理解；价格上涨 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
174
illiterate
|
|
| adj.文盲的；无知的；n.文盲 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
175
ferocious
|
|
| adj.凶猛的，残暴的，极度的，十分强烈的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
176
instinctive
|
|
| adj.(出于)本能的；直觉的；(出于)天性的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
177
confided
|
|
| v.吐露（秘密，心事等）( confide的过去式和过去分词 )；（向某人）吐露（隐私、秘密等） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
178
thereby
|
|
| adv.因此，从而 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
179
outlets
|
|
| n.出口( outlet的名词复数 )；经销店；插座；廉价经销店 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
180
anterior
|
|
| adj.较早的；在前的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
181
embody
|
|
| vt.具体表达，使具体化；包含，收录 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
182
remains
|
|
| n.剩余物，残留物；遗体，遗迹 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
183
domain
|
|
| n.(活动等)领域，范围；领地，势力范围 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
184
domains
|
|
| n.范围( domain的名词复数 )；领域；版图；地产 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
185
stratagem
|
|
| n.诡计，计谋 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
186
thrifty
|
|
| adj.节俭的；兴旺的；健壮的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
187
natal
|
|
| adj.出生的，先天的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
188
embark
|
|
| vi.乘船，着手，从事，上飞机 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
189
profusion
|
|
| n.挥霍；丰富 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
190
despoiled
|
|
| v.掠夺，抢劫( despoil的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
191
irony
|
|
| n.反语，冷嘲；具有讽刺意味的事，嘲弄 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
192
detriment
|
|
| n.损害；损害物，造成损害的根源 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
193
derives
|
|
| v.得到( derive的第三人称单数 )；（从…中）得到获得；源于；（从…中）提取 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
194
derive
|
|
| v.取得；导出；引申；来自；源自；出自 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
195
whatsoever
|
|
| adv.（用于否定句中以加强语气）任何；pron.无论什么 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
196
promotions
|
|
| 促进( promotion的名词复数 )； 提升； 推广； 宣传 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
197
clergy
|
|
| n.[总称]牧师，神职人员 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
198
allocating
|
|
| 分配，分派( allocate的现在分词 )； 把…拨给 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
199
joyous
|
|
| adj.充满快乐的；令人高兴的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
200
contractors
|
|
| n.（建筑、监造中的）承包人( contractor的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
201
concessions
|
|
| n.（尤指由政府或雇主给予的）特许权( concession的名词复数 )；承认；减价；（在某地的）特许经营权 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
202
plantations
|
|
| n.种植园，大农场( plantation的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
203
jobber
|
|
| n.批发商；(股票买卖)经纪人；做零工的人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
204
patriots
|
|
| 爱国者，爱国主义者( patriot的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
205
incur
|
|
| vt.招致，蒙受，遭遇 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
206
inveigle
|
|
| v.诱骗 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
207
averted
|
|
| 防止，避免( avert的过去式和过去分词 )； 转移 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
208
disinterested
|
|
| adj.不关心的，不感兴趣的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
209
intermittent
|
|
| adj.间歇的，断断续续的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
210
remarkable
|
|
| adj.显著的，异常的，非凡的，值得注意的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
211
provincial
|
|
| adj.省的，地方的；n．外省人，乡下人 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
212
essentially
|
|
| adv.本质上，实质上，基本上 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
213
attested
|
|
| adj.经检验证明无病的，经检验证明无菌的v.证明( attest的过去式和过去分词 )；证实；声称…属实；使宣誓 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
214
consternation
|
|
| n.大为吃惊，惊骇 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
215
confirmation
|
|
| n.证实，确认，批准 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
216
patriotic
|
|
| adj.爱国的，有爱国心的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
217
eloquent
|
|
| adj.雄辩的，口才流利的；明白显示出的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
218
superciliously
|
|
| adv.高傲地；傲慢地 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
219
cannon
|
|
| n.大炮，火炮；飞机上的机关炮 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
220
disseminated
|
|
| 散布，传播( disseminate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
221
bourgeois
|
|
| adj./n.追求物质享受的(人)；中产阶级分子 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
222
emblems
|
|
| n.象征，标记( emblem的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
223
inevitable
|
|
| adj.不可避免的，必然发生的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
224
concord
|
|
| n.和谐；协调 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
225
tranquillity
|
|
| n. 平静, 安静 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
226
vassal
|
|
| n.附庸的；属下；adj.奴仆的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
227
annexation
|
|
| n.吞并，合并 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
228
proclivities
|
|
| n.倾向，癖性( proclivity的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
229
perused
|
|
| v.读（某篇文字）( peruse的过去式和过去分词 )；（尤指）细阅；审阅；匆匆读或心不在焉地浏览（某篇文字） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
230
banish
|
|
| vt.放逐，驱逐；消除，排除 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
231
enervates
|
|
| v.使衰弱，使失去活力( enervate的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
232
eloquence
|
|
| n.雄辩；口才，修辞 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
233
tempted
|
|
| v.怂恿（某人）干不正当的事；冒…的险（tempt的过去分词） | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
234
strenuous
|
|
| adj.奋发的，使劲的；紧张的；热烈的，狂热的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
235
aggregation
|
|
| n.聚合，组合；凝聚 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
236
emigrants
|
|
| n.（从本国移往他国的）移民( emigrant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
237
scramble
|
|
| v.爬行，攀爬，杂乱蔓延，碎片，片段，废料 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
238
mighty
|
|
| adj.强有力的；巨大的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
239
torpedoes
|
|
| 鱼雷( torpedo的名词复数 )； 油井爆破筒； 刺客； 掼炮 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
240
inordinate
|
|
| adj.无节制的；过度的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
241
engenders
|
|
| v.产生（某形势或状况），造成，引起( engender的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
242
rivalries
|
|
| n.敌对，竞争，对抗( rivalry的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
243
kindle
|
|
| v.点燃，着火 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
244
hatreds
|
|
| n.仇恨，憎恶( hatred的名词复数 )；厌恶的事 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
245
tariffs
|
|
| 关税制度； 关税( tariff的名词复数 )； 关税表； （旅馆或饭店等的）收费表； 量刑标准 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
246
pervading
|
|
| v.遍及，弥漫( pervade的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
247
tinged
|
|
| v.（使）发丁丁声( ting的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
248
modesty
|
|
| n.谦逊，虚心，端庄，稳重，羞怯，朴素 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
249
immorality
|
|
| n. 不道德, 无道义 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
250
crave
|
|
| vt.渴望得到，迫切需要，恳求，请求 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
251
lighting
|
|
| n.照明，光线的明暗，舞台灯光 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
| 欢迎访问英文小说网 |