The point is that Man does what he likes. He claims the right to take his mother Nature under his control; he claims the right to make his child the Superman, in his image. Once flinch16 from this creative authority of man, and the whole courageous17 raid which we call civilization wavers and falls to pieces. Now most modern freedom is at root fear. It is not so much that we are too bold to endure rules; it is rather that we are too timid to endure responsibilities. And Mr. Shaw and such people are especially shrinking from that awful and ancestral responsibility to which our fathers committed us when they took the wild step of becoming men. I mean the responsibility of affirming the truth of our human tradition and handing it on with a voice of authority, an unshaken voice. That is the one eternal education; to be sure enough that something is true that you dare to tell it to a child. From this high audacious duty the moderns are fleeing on every side; and the only excuse for them is, (of course,) that their modern philosophies are so half-baked and hypothetical that they cannot convince themselves enough to convince even a newborn babe. This, of course, is connected with the decay of democracy; and is somewhat of a separate subject. Suffice it to say here that when I say that we should instruct our children, I mean that we should do it, not that Mr. Sully or Professor Earl Barnes should do it. The trouble in too many of our modern schools is that the State, being controlled so specially18 by the few, allows cranks and experiments to go straight to the schoolroom when they have never passed through the Parliament, the public house, the private house, the church, or the marketplace. Obviously, it ought to be the oldest things that are taught to the youngest people; the assured and experienced truths that are put first to the baby. But in a school to-day the baby has to submit to a system that is younger than himself. The flopping19 infant of four actually has more experience, and has weathered the world longer, than the dogma to which he is made to submit. Many a school boasts of having the last ideas in education, when it has not even the first idea; for the first idea is that even innocence20, divine as it is, may learn something from experience. But this, as I say, is all due to the mere21 fact that we are managed by a little oligarchy22; my system presupposes that men who govern themselves will govern their children. To-day we all use Popular Education as meaning education of the people. I wish I could use it as meaning education by the people.
The urgent point at present is that these expansive educators do not avoid the violence of authority an inch more than the old school masters. Nay23, it might be maintained that they avoid it less. The old village schoolmaster beat a boy for not learning grammar and sent him out into the playground to play anything he liked; or at nothing, if he liked that better. The modern scientific schoolmaster pursues him into the playground and makes him play at cricket, because exercise is so good for the health. The modern Dr. Busby is a doctor of medicine as well as a doctor of divinity. He may say that the good of exercise is self-evident; but he must say it, and say it with authority. It cannot really be self-evident or it never could have been compulsory24. But this is in modern practice a very mild case. In modern practice the free educationists forbid far more things than the old-fashioned educationists. A person with a taste for paradox25 (if any such shameless creature could exist) might with some plausibility26 maintain concerning all our expansion since the failure of Luther’s frank paganism and its replacement27 by Calvin’s Puritanism, that all this expansion has not been an expansion, but the closing in of a prison, so that less and less beautiful and humane28 things have been permitted. The Puritans destroyed images; the Rationalists forbade fairy tales. Count Tostoi practically issued one of his papal encyclicals against music; and I have heard of modern educationists who forbid children to play with tin soldiers. I remember a meek29 little madman who came up to me at some Socialist30 soiree or other, and asked me to use my influence (have I any influence?) against adventure stories for boys. It seems they breed an appetite for blood. But never mind that; one must keep one’s temper in this madhouse. I need only insist here that these things, even if a just deprivation31, are a deprivation. I do not deny that the old vetoes and punishments were often idiotic32 and cruel; though they are much more so in a country like England (where in practice only a rich man decrees the punishment and only a poor man receives it) than in countries with a clearer popular tradition—such as Russia. In Russia flogging is often inflicted33 by peasants on a peasant. In modern England flogging can only in practice be inflicted by a gentleman on a very poor man. Thus only a few days ago as I write a small boy (a son of the poor, of course) was sentenced to flogging and imprisonment34 for five years for having picked up a small piece of coal which the experts value at 5d. I am entirely35 on the side of such liberals and humanitarians36 as have protested against this almost bestial37 ignorance about boys. But I do think it a little unfair that these humanitarians, who excuse boys for being robbers, should denounce them for playing at robbers. I do think that those who understand a guttersnipe playing with a piece of coal might, by a sudden spurt38 of imagination, understand him playing with a tin soldier. To sum it up in one sentence: I think my meek little madman might have understood that there is many a boy who would rather be flogged, and unjustly flogged, than have his adventure story taken away.
点击收听单词发音
1 parental | |
adj.父母的;父的;母的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 faculties | |
n.能力( faculty的名词复数 );全体教职员;技巧;院 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 inevitable | |
adj.不可避免的,必然发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 scholastic | |
adj.学校的,学院的,学术上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 instructor | |
n.指导者,教员,教练 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 faculty | |
n.才能;学院,系;(学院或系的)全体教学人员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 forgery | |
n.伪造的文件等,赝品,伪造(行为) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 pompous | |
adj.傲慢的,自大的;夸大的;豪华的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 pokes | |
v.伸出( poke的第三人称单数 );戳出;拨弄;与(某人)性交 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 poked | |
v.伸出( poke的过去式和过去分词 );戳出;拨弄;与(某人)性交 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 fiddle | |
n.小提琴;vi.拉提琴;不停拨弄,乱动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 brutal | |
adj.残忍的,野蛮的,不讲理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 trifling | |
adj.微不足道的;没什么价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 tormentor | |
n. 使苦痛之人, 使苦恼之物, 侧幕 =tormenter | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 apothecary | |
n.药剂师 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 flinch | |
v.畏缩,退缩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 courageous | |
adj.勇敢的,有胆量的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 specially | |
adv.特定地;特殊地;明确地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 flopping | |
n.贬调v.(指书、戏剧等)彻底失败( flop的现在分词 );(因疲惫而)猛然坐下;(笨拙地、不由自主地或松弛地)移动或落下;砸锅 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 innocence | |
n.无罪;天真;无害 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 oligarchy | |
n.寡头政治 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 nay | |
adv.不;n.反对票,投反对票者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 compulsory | |
n.强制的,必修的;规定的,义务的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 paradox | |
n.似乎矛盾却正确的说法;自相矛盾的人(物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 plausibility | |
n. 似有道理, 能言善辩 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 replacement | |
n.取代,替换,交换;替代品,代用品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 humane | |
adj.人道的,富有同情心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 meek | |
adj.温顺的,逆来顺受的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 socialist | |
n.社会主义者;adj.社会主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 deprivation | |
n.匮乏;丧失;夺去,贫困 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 idiotic | |
adj.白痴的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 inflicted | |
把…强加给,使承受,遭受( inflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 imprisonment | |
n.关押,监禁,坐牢 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 humanitarians | |
n.慈善家( humanitarian的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 bestial | |
adj.残忍的;野蛮的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 spurt | |
v.喷出;突然进发;突然兴隆 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |