‘Professor Tillman. Most of us here are not scientists, so youmay need to be a little less technical.’ This sort of thing isincredibly annoying. People can tell you the supposedcharacteristics of a Gemini or a Taurus and will spend fivedays watching a cricket match, but cannot find the interest orthe time to learn the basics of what they, as humans, aremade up of.
I continued with my presentation as I had prepared it. It wastoo late to change and surely some of the audience wereinformed enough to understand.
I was right. A hand went up, a male of about twelve.
‘You are saying that it is unlikely that there is a single geneticmarker, but rather that several genes5 are implicated6 and theaggregate expression depends on the specific combination.
Affirmative?’
16/290Exactly! ‘Plus environmental factors. The situation is analogousto bipolar disorder4, which –’
Julie interrupted again. ‘So, for us non-geniuses, I thinkProfessor Tillman is reminding us that Asperger’s is somethingyou’re born with.
It’s nobody’s fault.’
I was horrified7 by the use of the word ‘fault’, with its negativecon-notations, especially as it was being employed by someonein authority. I abandoned my decision not to deviate8 from thegenetic issues.
The matter had doubtless been brewing9 in my subconscious,and the volume of my voice may have increased as a result.
‘Fault! Asperger’s isn’t a fault. It’s a variant10. It’s potentially amajor advantage. Asperger’s syndrome11 is associated withorganisation, focus, innovative12 thinking and rational detachment.’
A woman at the rear of the room raised her hand. I wasfocused on the argument now, and made a minor13 social error,which I quickly corrected.
‘The fat woman – overweight woman – at the back?’
She paused and looked around the room, but then continued,‘Rational detachment: is that a euphemism14 for lack of emotion?’
‘Synonym,’ I replied. ‘Emotions can cause major problems.’
I decided15 it would be helpful to provide an example, drawingon a story in which emotional behaviour would have led todisastrous consequences.
‘Imagine,’ I said. ‘You’re hiding in a basement. The enemy issearching for you and your friends. Everyone has to keeptotally quiet, but your baby is crying.’ I did an impression, asGene would, to make the story more convincing: ‘Waaaaa.’ Ipaused dramatically. ‘You have a gun.’
Hands went up everywhere.
17/290Julie jumped to her feet as I continued. ‘With a silencer.
They’re coming closer. They’re going to kill you all. What doyou do? The baby’s screaming –’
The kids couldn’t wait to share their answer. One called out,‘Shoot the baby,’ and soon they were all shouting, ‘Shoot thebaby, shoot the baby.’
The boy who had asked the genetics question called out, ‘Shootthe enemy,’ and then another said, ‘Ambush them.’
The suggestions were coming rapidly.
‘Use the baby as bait.’
‘How many guns do we have?’
‘Cover its mouth.’
‘How long can it live without air?’
As I had expected, all the ideas came from the Asperger’s‘sufferers’.
The parents made no constructive16 suggestions; some even triedto suppress their children’s creativity.
I raised my hands. ‘Time’s up. Excellent work. All the rationalsolutions came from the aspies. Everyone else was incapacitatedby emotion.’
One boy called out, ‘Aspies rule!’ I had noted17 this abbreviationin the literature, but it appeared to be new to the children.
They seemed to like it, and soon were standing18 on the chairsand then the desks, punching the air and chanting ‘Aspiesrule!’ in chorus. According to my reading, children withAsperger’s syndrome frequently lack self-confidence in socialsituations. Their success in problem-solving seemed to haveprovided a temporary cure for this, but again their parentswere failing to provide positive feedback, shouting at them andin some cases attempting to pull them down from the desks.
Apparently19 they were more concerned with adherence20 to socialconvention than the progress their children were making.
18/290I felt I had made my point effectively, and Julie did not thinkwe needed to continue with the genetics. The parents appearedto be reflecting on what their children had learned and leftwithout interacting with me further. It was only 7.43 p.m. Anexcellent outcome.
As I packed up my laptop, Julie burst out laughing.
‘Oh my God,’ she said. ‘I need a drink.’
I was not sure why she was sharing this information withsomeone she had known for only forty-six minutes. I plannedto consume some alcohol myself when I arrived home but sawno reason to inform Julie.
She continued, ‘You know, we never use that word. Aspies. Wedon’t want them thinking it’s some sort of club.’ More negativeimplications from someone who was presumably paid to assistand encourage.
‘Like homosexuality?’ I said.
‘Touché,’ said Julie. ‘But it’s different. If they don’t change,they’re not going to have real relationships – they’ll never havepartners.’ This was a reasonable argument, and one that Icould understand, given my own difficulties in that sphere. ButJulie changed the subject. ‘But you’re saying there are things –useful things – they can do better than… non-aspies? Besides killing21 babies.’
‘Of course.’ I wondered why someone involved in the educationof people with uncommon22 attributes was not aware of thevalue of and market for such attributes. ‘There’s a company inDenmark that re-cruits aspies for computer applications testing.’
‘I didn’t know that,’ said Julie. ‘You’re really giving me adifferent perspective.’ She looked at me for a few moments.
‘Do you have time for a drink?’ And then she put her handon my shoulder.
I flinched23 automatically. Definitely inappropriate contact. If I haddone that to a woman there would almost certainly have beena problem, possibly a sexual harassment24 complaint to the Dean,which could have consequences for my career. Of course, noone was going to criticise25 her for it.
19/290‘Unfortunately, I have other activities scheduled.’
‘No flexibility26?’
‘Definitely not.’ Having succeeded in recovering lost time, I wasnot about to throw my life into chaos27 again.
Before I met Gene1 and Claudia I had two other friends. Thefirst was my older sister. Although she was a mathematicsteacher, she had little interest in advances in the field. However,she lived nearby and would visit twice weekly and sometimesrandomly. We would eat together and discuss trivia, such asevents in the lives of our relatives and social interactions withour colleagues. Once a month, we drove to Shepparton forSunday dinner with our parents and brother. She was single,probably as a result of being shy and not conventionallyattractive.
Due to gross and inexcusable medical incompetence29, she is nowdead.
The second friend was Daphne, whose friendship period alsoover-lapped with Gene and Claudia’s. She moved into theapartment above mine after her husband entered a nursinghome, as a result of demen-tia. Due to knee failure,exacerbated by obesity30, she was unable to walk more than afew steps, but she was highly intelligent and I began to visither regularly. She had no formal qualifications, havingperformed a traditional female homemaker role. I consideredthis to be an extreme waste of talent – particularly as herdescendants did not return the care. She was curious aboutmy work, and we initiated31 the Teach Daphne Genetics Project,which was fascinating for both of us.
She began eating her dinner in my apartment on a regularbasis, as there are massive economies of scale in cooking onemeal for two people, rather than two separate meals. EachSunday at 3.00 p.m. we would visit her husband at thenursing home, which was 7.3 kilometres away. I was able tocombine a 14.6-kilometre walk pushing a wheelchair withinteresting conversation about genetics. I would read20/290while she spoke32 to her husband, whose level of comprehensionwas difficult to determine but definitely low.
Daphne had been named after the plant that was flowering atthe time of her birth, on the twenty-eighth of August. On eachbirthday, her husband would give her daphne flowers, and sheconsidered this a highly romantic action. She complained thather approaching birthday would be the first occasion in fifty-sixyears on which this symbolic33 act would not be performed. Thesolution was obvious, and when I wheeled her to myapartment for dinner on her seventy-eighth birthday, I hadpurchased a quantity of the flowers to give her.
She recognised the smell immediately and began crying. Ithought I had made a terrible error, but she explained that hertears were a symptom of happiness. She was also impressedby the chocolate cake that I had made, but not to the sameextent.
During the meal, she made an incredible statement: ‘Don, youwould make someone a wonderful husband.’
This was so contrary to my experiences of being rejected bywomen that I was temporarily stunned34. Then I presented herwith the facts –the history of my attempts to find a partner, beginning withmy assumption as a child that I would grow up and getmarried and finishing with my abandonment of the idea as theevidence grew that I was unsuitable.
Her argument was simple: there’s someone for everyone.
Statistically35, she was almost certainly correct. Unfortunately, theprobability that I would find such a person was vanishinglysmall. But it created a disturbance36 in my brain, like amathematical problem that we know must have a solution.
For her next two birthdays, we repeated the flower ritual. Theresults were not as dramatic as the first time, but I alsopurchased gifts for her – books on genetics – and she seemedvery happy. She told me that her birthday had always beenher favourite day of the year. I21/290understood that this view was common in children, due to thegifts, but had not expected it in an adult.
Ninety-three days after the third birthday dinner, we weretravelling to the nursing home, discussing a genetics paper thatDaphne had read the previous day, when it became apparentthat she had forgotten some significant points. It was not thefirst time in recent weeks that her memory had been faulty,and I immediately organised an assessment37 of her cognitivefunctioning. The diagnosis38 was Alzheimer’s disease.
Daphne’s intellectual capability39 deteriorated40 rapidly, and we weresoon unable to have our discussions about genetics. But wecontinued our meals and walks to the nursing home. Daphnenow spoke primarily about her past, focusing on her husbandand family, and I was able to form a generalised view of whatmarried life could be like. She continued to insist that I couldfind a compatible partner and enjoy the high level of happinessthat she had experienced in her own life. Supplementaryresearch confirmed that Daphne’s arguments were supported byevidence: married men are happier and live longer.
One day Daphne asked, ‘When will it be my birthday again?’
and I realised that she had lost track of dates. I decided that itwould be acceptable to lie in order to maximise her happiness.
The problem was to source some daphne out of season, but Ihad unexpected success. I was aware of a geneticist who wasworking on altering and extending the flowering of plants forcommercial reasons. He was able to supply my flower vendorwith some daphne, and we had a simulated birthday dinner. Irepeated the procedure each time Daphne asked about herbirthday.
Eventually, it was necessary for Daphne to join her husband atthe nursing home, and, as her memory failed, we celebratedher birthdays more often, until I was visiting her daily. Theflower vendor41 gave me a special loyalty42 card. I calculated thatDaphne had reached the age of22/290two hundred and seven, according to the number of birthdays,when she stopped recognising me, and three hundred andnineteen when she no longer responded to the daphne and Iabandoned the visits.
I did not expect to hear from Julie again. As usual, myassumptions about human behaviour were wrong. Two daysafter the lecture, at 3.37 p.m., my phone rang with anunfamiliar number. Julie left a message asking me to call back,and I deduced that I must have left something behind.
I was wrong again. She wanted to continue our discussion ofAsperger’s syndrome. I was pleased that my input43 had been soinfluential.
She suggested we meet over dinner, which was not the ideallocation for productive discussion, but, as I usually eat dinneralone, it would be easy to schedule. Background research wasanother matter.
‘What specific topics are you interested in?’
‘Oh,’ she said, ‘I thought we could just talk generally … get toknow each other a bit.’
This sounded unfocused. ‘I need at least a broad indication ofthe subject domain44. What did I say that particularly interestedyou?’
‘Oh … I guess the stuff about the computer testers inDenmark.’
‘Computer applications testers.’ I would definitely need to dosome research. ‘What would you like to know?’
‘I was wondering how they found them. Most adults withAsperger’s syndrome don’t know they have it.’
It was a good point. Interviewing random28 applicants45 would bea highly inefficient46 way to detect a syndrome that has anestimated pre-valence of less than 0.3 per cent.
I ventured a guess. ‘I presume they use a questionnaire as apreliminary filter.’ I had not even finished the sentence when alight went on in my head – not literally47, of course.
23/290A questionnaire! Such an obvious solution. A purpose-built,scientifically valid48 instrument incorporating current best practiceto filter out the time wasters, the disorganised, the ice-creamdiscriminators, the visual-harassment complainers, the crystalgazers, the horoscope readers, the fashion obsessives, thereligious fanatics49, the vegans, the sports watchers, thecreationists, the smokers50, the scientifically illiterate51, thehomeopaths, leaving, ideally, the perfect partner, or, realistically,a manageable shortlist of candidates.
‘Don?’ It was Julie, still on the line. ‘When do you want to gettogether?’
Things had changed. Priorities had shifted.
‘It’s not possible,’ I said. ‘My schedule is full.’
I was going to need all available time for the new project.
The Wife Project.
点击
收听单词发音
收听单词发音 |
1
gene
|
|
| n.遗传因子，基因 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
2
genetic
|
|
| adj.遗传的，遗传学的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
3
precursors
|
|
| n.先驱( precursor的名词复数 )；先行者；先兆；初期形式 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
4
disorder
|
|
| n.紊乱，混乱；骚动，骚乱；疾病，失调 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
5
genes
|
|
| n.基因( gene的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
6
implicated
|
|
| adj.密切关联的；牵涉其中的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
7
horrified
|
|
| a.(表现出)恐惧的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
8
deviate
|
|
| v.(from)背离，偏离 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
9
brewing
|
|
| n. 酿造, 一次酿造的量 动词brew的现在分词形式 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
10
variant
|
|
| adj.不同的，变异的；n.变体，异体 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
11
syndrome
|
|
| n.综合病症；并存特性 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
12
innovative
|
|
| adj.革新的，新颖的，富有革新精神的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
13
minor
|
|
| adj.较小(少)的，较次要的；n.辅修学科；vi.辅修 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
14
euphemism
|
|
| n.婉言，委婉的说法 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
15
decided
|
|
| adj.决定了的，坚决的；明显的，明确的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
16
constructive
|
|
| adj.建设的，建设性的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
17
noted
|
|
| adj.著名的，知名的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
18
standing
|
|
| n.持续，地位；adj.永久的，不动的，直立的，不流动的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
19
apparently
|
|
| adv.显然地；表面上，似乎 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
20
adherence
|
|
| n.信奉，依附，坚持，固着 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
21
killing
|
|
| n.巨额利润；突然赚大钱，发大财 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
22
uncommon
|
|
| adj.罕见的，非凡的，不平常的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
23
flinched
|
|
| v.（因危险和痛苦）退缩，畏惧( flinch的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
24
harassment
|
|
| n.骚扰，扰乱，烦恼，烦乱 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
25
criticise
|
|
| v.批评，评论；非难 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
26
flexibility
|
|
| n.柔韧性，弹性，（光的）折射性，灵活性 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
27
chaos
|
|
| n.混乱，无秩序 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
28
random
|
|
| adj.随机的；任意的；n.偶然的(或随便的)行动 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
29
incompetence
|
|
| n.不胜任，不称职 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
30
obesity
|
|
| n.肥胖，肥大 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
31
initiated
|
|
| n. 创始人 adj. 新加入的 vt. 开始，创始，启蒙，介绍加入 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
32
spoke
|
|
| n.（车轮的）辐条；轮辐；破坏某人的计划；阻挠某人的行动 v.讲，谈（speak的过去式）；说；演说；从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
33
symbolic
|
|
| adj.象征性的，符号的，象征主义的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
34
stunned
|
|
| adj. 震惊的，惊讶的 动词stun的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
35
statistically
|
|
| ad.根据统计数据来看，从统计学的观点来看 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
36
disturbance
|
|
| n.动乱，骚动；打扰，干扰；(身心)失调 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
37
assessment
|
|
| n.评价；评估；对财产的估价，被估定的金额 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
38
diagnosis
|
|
| n.诊断，诊断结果，调查分析，判断 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
39
capability
|
|
| n.能力；才能；(pl)可发展的能力或特性等 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
40
deteriorated
|
|
| 恶化，变坏( deteriorate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
41
vendor
|
|
| n.卖主；小贩 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
42
loyalty
|
|
| n.忠诚，忠心 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
43
input
|
|
| n.输入(物)；投入；vt.把(数据等)输入计算机 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
44
domain
|
|
| n.(活动等)领域，范围；领地，势力范围 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
45
applicants
|
|
| 申请人，求职人( applicant的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
46
inefficient
|
|
| adj.效率低的，无效的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
47
literally
|
|
| adv.照字面意义，逐字地；确实 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
48
valid
|
|
| adj.有确实根据的；有效的；正当的，合法的 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
49
fanatics
|
|
| 狂热者，入迷者( fanatic的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
50
smokers
|
|
| 吸烟者( smoker的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
|
51
illiterate
|
|
| adj.文盲的；无知的；n.文盲 | |
参考例句： |
|
|
|
| 欢迎访问英文小说网 |