The result of recent enquiries into the state of civilisation1 under the Roman Empire during the first two centuries of its existence, has been to suggest conclusions in many respects at variance2 with those formerly3 entertained. Instead of the intellectual stagnation4, the moral turpitude5, and the religious indifference6 which were once supposed to have been the most marked characteristics of that period, modern scholars discern symptoms of active and fruitful thought, of purity and disinterestedness7 both in public and private life, but above all of a religious feeling which erred8 far more on the side of excess than on the side of defect. This change of view may be traced to various causes. A new class of investigators9 have made ancient history an object of special study. Fresh evidence has been brought to light, and a more discriminating10 as well as a more extended use has been made of the sources already available. And, perhaps, even greater importance is attributable to the principle now so generally accepted, that historical phenomena11, like all other phenomena, are essentially12 continuous in their movement. The old theories assumed that the substitution of Christian13 for what is called Pagan196 civilisation was accompanied by a sudden break in men’s habits and ideas. But the whole spirit of modern philosophy has prepared us to believe that such a break is not likely to have ever occurred. And a new survey of the period in question is leading us to the conviction that, as a matter of fact, it did not occur.
For a long time the history of the Roman Empire was written by the descendants of its most deadly enemies—by Christian ecclesiastics14 or by scholars trained under their influence, and by the inheritors of the northern races who overran and destroyed it. The natural tendency of both classes was to paint the vices15 of the old society in the most glaring colours, that by so doing they might exhibit the virtues16 of its conquerors18 and the necessity of their mission in stronger relief. In this respect, their task was greatly facilitated by the character of the authorities from whom their information was principally derived21. Horace and Petronius, Seneca and Juvenal, Tacitus and Suetonius, furnished them with pictures of depravity which it was impossible to exaggerate, which had even to be toned down before they could be reproduced in a modern language. No allowance was made for the influence of a rhetorical training in fostering the cultivation22 of effect at the expense of truth, nor for the influence of aristocratic prejudice in securing a ready acceptance for whatever tended to the discredit23 of a monarchical24 government. It was also forgotten that the court and society of Rome could give no idea of the life led in the rest of Italy and in the provinces. Moreover, the contrast continually instituted or implied by these historians was not between the ancient civilisation and the state of things which immediately succeeded it, nor yet between the society of a great capital as it was then, and as it was in the historian’s own time. The points selected for contrast were what was worst in Paganism and what is best in Christianity. The one was judged from the standpoint of courtiers and men of the world,197 embittered27 by disappointment and familiar with every form of depravity, the other was judged from the standpoint of experience acquired in a college quadrangle, a country parsonage, or a cathedral close. The modern writer knew little enough even about his own country, he knew next to nothing about what morality was in the Middle Ages, and nothing at all about what it still continues to be in modern Italy.
Even the very imperfect means of information supplied by the literature of the empire were not utilised to the fullest extent. It was naturally the writers of most brilliant genius who received most attention, and these, as it happened, were the most prejudiced against their contemporaries. Their observations, too, were put on record under the form of sweeping28 generalisations; while the facts from which a different conclusion might be gathered lay scattered29 through the pages of more obscure authorities, needing to be carefully sifted31 out and brought together by those who wished to arrive at a more impartial32 view of the age to which they relate.
Another noteworthy circumstance is that the last centuries of Paganism were on the whole marked by a steady literary decline. To a literary man, this meant that civilisation as a whole was retrograding, that it was an effete33 organism which could only be regenerated34 by the infusion35 of new life from without; while, conversely, the fresh literary productivity of mediaeval and modern Europe was credited to the complete renovation37 which Christianity and the Barbarians38 were supposed to have wrought40. A closer study of Roman law has done much to correct this superficial impression. It has revealed the existence, in at least one most important domain41, of a vast intellectual and moral advance continued down to the death of Marcus Aurelius. And the retrograde movement which set in with Commodus may be fairly attributed to the increased militarism necessitated42 by the encroachments of barbarism, and more directly to the infusion of barbarian39 elements into the territory of the empire, rather198 than to any spontaneous decay of Roman civilisation. The subsequent resuscitation43 of art and letters is another testimony44 to the permanent value and vitality45 of ancient culture. It was in those provinces which had remained least affected46 by the northern invasion, such as Venetia and Tuscany, that the free activity of the human intellect was first or most fruitfully resumed, and it was from the irradiation of still unconquered Byzantium that the light which re-awakened them was derived.
Another science which has only been cultivated on a large scale within comparatively recent years has confirmed the views suggested by jurisprudence. An enormous mass of inscriptions49 has been brought to light, deciphered, collated50, and made available by transcription for the purposes of sedentary scholars. With the help of these records, fragmentary though they be, we have obtained an insight into the sentiments, beliefs, and social institutions of Pagan antiquity51 as it was just before the conversion52 of the Roman world to Christianity, such as literature alone could not supply. Literature and history, too, have told a somewhat different story when read over again in the light of these new discoveries. Finally, the whole mine of materials, new and old, has been worked by a class of enquirers who bring to their task qualities nearly unknown among the scholars of a former generation. These men are familiar with an immense range of studies lying outside their special subject, but often capable of affording it unexpected illustrations; they are free from theological prejudices; they are sometimes versed53 in the practical conduct of state affairs; and habits of wide social intercourse54 have emancipated55 them from the narrowing associations incident to a learned profession.
Perhaps no subject has gained so much from the application of the new historical method as that which we have now to study in its connexion with the progress of Greek philosophy. This is the religion of the Roman empire. On199 former occasions, we have had to observe how fruitful was the interaction between faith and reason in the early stages of Greek thought. We have now to show how the same process was continued on a greater scale during its later development and diffusion56. The conditions and results of this conflict have sometimes been gravely misconceived. We have said that in more than one direction important advances were made under the empire. In the direction of pure rationalism, however, there was no advance at all, but, on the contrary, a continual loss of the ground formerly won. The polytheism which Christianity displaced turns out to have been far more vigorous and fertile than was once supposed, and in particular to have been supported by a much stronger body not only of popular sentiment, but, what at first seems very surprising, of educated conviction. We were formerly taught to believe that the faith of Homer and Aeschylus, of Pythagoras and Pheidias, was in the last stage of decrepitude57 when its destined58 successor appeared, that it had long been abandoned by the philosophers, and was giving place in the minds of the vulgar to more exciting forms of superstition59 newly imported from the East. The undue60 preponderance given to purely61 literary sources of information is largely responsible for an opinion which now appears to have been mistaken. Among the great Roman writers, Lucretius proclaims himself a mortal enemy to religion; Ennius and Horace are disbelievers in providence62; the attitude of Juvenal towards the gods and towards a future life is at least ambiguous, and that of Tacitus undecided; Cicero attacks the current superstitions63 with a vigour64 which has diverted attention from the essentially religious character of his convictions; Lucian, by far the most popular Greek writer of the empire, is notorious for his hostility65 to every form of theology. Among less known authors, the elder Pliny passionately66 denounces the belief in a divine guidance of life and in the immortality67 of the soul.306200 Taken alone, these instances would tend to prove that sceptical ideas were very widely diffused69 through Roman society, both before and after the establishment of the empire. Side by side, however, with the authorities just cited there are others breathing a very different spirit; and what we have especially to notice is that with the progress of time the latter party are continually gaining in weight and numbers. And this, as we shall now proceed to show, is precisely70 what might have been expected from the altered circumstances which ensued when the civilised world was subjected to a single city, and that city herself to a single chief.
II.
In the world of thought no less than in the world of action, the boundless71 license72 which characterised the last days of Roman republicanism was followed by a period of tranquillity73 and restraint. Augustus endeavoured to associate his system of imperialism74 with a revival75 of religious authority. By his orders a great number of ruinous temples were restored, and the old ceremonies were celebrated76 once more with all their former pomp. His efforts in this direction were ably seconded by the greatest poet and the greatest historian of the age. Both Virgil and Livy were animated77 by a warm religious feeling, associated, at least in the case of the latter, with a credulity which knew no bounds. With both, religion took an antiquarian form. They were convinced that Rome had grown great through faith in the gods, that she had a divine mandate78 to conquer the world, and that this supernatural mission might be most clearly perceived in the circumstances of her first origin.307 It is also characteristic that both should have been provincials80, educated in the traditions of a201 reverent81 conservatism, and sympathising chiefly with those elements in the constitution of Rome which brought her nearest to primitive82 Italian habits and ideas. Now it was not merely the policy, it was the inevitable84 consequence of imperialism to favour the provinces308 at the expense of the capital, by depriving the urban population and the senatorial aristocracy of the political preponderance which they had formerly enjoyed. Here, as in most other instances, what we call a reaction did not mean a change in the opinions or sentiments of any particular persons or classes, but the advent85 of a new class whose ways of thinking now determined86 the general tone of the public mind.
One symptom of this reaction was the fashionable archaism of the Augustan age, the tendency to despise whatever was new in literature, and to exalt87 whatever was old. It is well known how feelingly Horace complains of a movement which was used to damage his own reputation as a poet;309 but what seems to have escaped observation is, that this protest against the literary archaism of his contemporaries is only one symptom of a much profounder division between his philosophy and theirs. He was just as good a patriot89 as they were, but his sympathies were with the Hellenising aristocracy to which Lucretius and Cicero had belonged, not with the narrow-minded conservatism of the middle classes and the country people. He was a man of progress and free-thought, who accepted the empire for what it might be worth, a Roman Prosper90 Merimée or Sainte-Beuve, whose preference of order to anarchy91 did not involve any respect for superstitious92 beliefs simply because they were supported by authority. And this healthy common sense is so much a part of his character, that he sometimes gives his mistresses the benefit of it, warning Leuconoe against the Babylonian soothsayers, and telling202 Phidyle that the gods should be approached not only with sacrifices but with clean hands.310 Yet so strong was the spirit of the age, that the sceptical poet occasionally feels himself obliged to second or to applaud the work of restoration undertaken by Augustus, and to augur93 from it, with more or less sincerity94, a reformation in private life.311 And even the frivolous95 Ovid may be supposed to have had the same object in view when composing his Fasti.
The religious revival initiated96 by Augustus for his own purposes was soon absorbed and lost in a much wider movement, following independent lines and determined by forces whose existence neither he nor any of his contemporaries could suspect. Even for his own purposes, something more was needed than a mere83 return to the past. The old Roman faith and worship were too dry and meagre to satisfy the cravings of the Romans themselves in the altered conditions created for them by the possession of a world-wide empire; still less could they furnish a meeting-ground for all the populations which that empire was rapidly fusing into a single mass. But what was wanted might be trusted to evolve itself without any assistance from without, once free scope was given to the religious instincts of mankind. These had long been kept in abeyance98 by the creeds99 which they had originally called into existence, and by the rigid101 political organisation102 of the ancient city-state. Local patriotism103 was adverse104 to the introduction of new beliefs either from within or from without. Once the general interests of a community had been placed under the guardianship106 of certain deities108 with definite names and jurisdictions109, it was understood that they would feel offended at the prospect111 of seeing their privileges invaded by a rival power; and were that rival the patron of another community, his introduction might seem like a surrender of national independence at the feet of an alien conqueror19. So,203 also, no very active proselytism was likely to be carried on when the adherents113 of each particular religion believed that its adoption114 by an alien community would enable strangers and possible enemies to secure a share of the favour which had hitherto been reserved for themselves exclusively. And to allure115 away the gods of a hostile town by the promise of a new establishment was, in fact, one of the stratagems116 commonly employed by the general of the besieging118 army.312
If the Roman conquest did not altogether put an end to these sentiments, it considerably119 mitigated120 their intensity121. The imperial city was too strong to feel endangered by the introduction of alien deities within its precincts. The subject states were relieved from anxiety with regard to a political independence which they had irrecoverably lost. Moreover, since the conquests of Alexander, vast aggregations122 of human beings had come into existence, to which the ancient exclusiveness was unknown, because they never had been cities at all in the ancient sense of the word. Such were Alexandria and Antioch, and these speedily became centres of religious syncretism. Rome herself, in becoming the capital of an immense empire, acquired the same cosmopolitan123 character. Her population consisted for the most part of emancipated slaves, and of adventurers from all parts of the world, many of whom had brought their national faiths with them, while all were ready to embrace any new faith which had superior attractions to offer. Another important agent in the diffusion and propagation of new religions was the army. The legions constituted a sort of migratory124 city, recruited from all parts of the empire, and moving over its whole extent. The dangers of a military life combined with its authoritative125 ideas are highly favourable126 to devotion; and the soldiers could readily adopt new modes for the expression of this feeling both from each other and from the inhabitants of the countries where they were stationed, and would in turn204 become missionaries127 for their dissemination128 over the most distant regions. That such was actually the case is proved by numerous religious inscriptions found in the neighbourhood of Roman camps.313
After considering by what agencies the seeds of religious belief were carried from place to place, we have to examine, what was even more important, the quality of the soil on which they fell. And here, to continue the metaphor129, we shall find that the Roman plough had not only broken through the crust of particularist prejudice, but had turned up new social strata117 eminently130 fitted to receive and nourish the germs scattered over their surface by every breeze and every bird of passage, or planted and watered by a spiritual sower’s hand. Along with the positive check of an established worship, the negative check of dissolving criticism had, to a great extent, disappeared with the destruction of the régime which had been most favourable to its exercise during the early stages of progress. The old city aristocracies were not merely opposed on patriotic132 grounds to free-trade in religion, but, as the most educated and independent class in the community, they were the first to shake off supernatural beliefs of every kind. We have grown so accustomed to seeing those beliefs upheld by the partisans133 of political privilege and attacked in the name of democratic principles, that we are apt to forget how very modern is the association of free-thought with the supremacy134 of numbers. It only dates from the French Revolution, and even now it is far from obtaining everywhere. Athens was the most perfectly135 organised democracy of antiquity, and in the course of this work we have repeatedly had occasion to observe how strong was the spirit of religious bigotry136 among the Athenian people. If we want rationalistic opinions we must go to the great nobles and their friends, to a Pericles, a Critias, or a Protagoras. There must also have been perfect intellectual liberty among205 the Roman nobles who took up Hellenic culture with such eagerness towards the middle of the second century B.C., and among those who, at a later period, listened with equanimity137 or approval to Caesar’s profession of Epicureanism in a crowded senatorial debate. It was as much in order that the De Rerum Natura should have been written by a member of this class as that the Aeneid should proceed from the pen of a modest provincial79 farmer. In positive knowledge, Virgil greatly excelled Lucretius, but his beliefs were inevitably138 determined by the traditions of his ignorant neighbours. When civil war, proscription139, delation, and, perhaps more than any other cause, their own delirious140 extravagance, had wrought the ruin of the Roman aristocracy, their places were taken by respectable provincials who brought with them the convictions without the genius of the Mantuan poet; and thenceforward the tide of religious reaction never ceased rising until the Crusades, which were its supreme141 expression, unexpectedly brought about a first revival of Hellenic culture. On that occasion, also, the first symptoms of revolt manifested themselves among the nobles; taking the form of Gnosticism in the brilliant courts of Languedoc, and, at a later period, of Epicureanism in the Ghibelline circles of Florentine society; while, conversely, when the Ciompi or poorer artisans of Florence rose in revolt against the rich traders, one of the first demands made by the successful insurgents143 was, that a preaching friar should be sent to give them religious instruction. At a still later period, the same opposition144 of intellectual interests continues to be defined by the same social divisions. Two distinct currents of thought co-operated to bring about the Protestant Reformation. One, which was religious and reactionary145, proceeded from the people. The other, which was secularising, scholarly, and scientific, represented the tendencies of the upper classes and of those who looked to them for encouragement and support. Throughout the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, many noble names are to be found206 among the champions of reason; and while speculative146 liberty is associated with the ascendency of the aristocratic party, superstition and intolerance are associated with the triumph of the people, whether under the form of a democracy or of a levelling despotism. So, also, the great emancipating148 movement of the eighteenth century was fostered by the descendants of the Crusaders, and, until after the Revolution, met with no response among the bourgeoisie or the people; indeed the reaction in favour of supernaturalism was begun by a child of the people, Rousseau. All this, as we have already observed, has been reversed in more recent times; but the facts quoted are enough to prove how natural it was that in the ancient world decay of class privileges should be equivalent to a strengthening of the influences which made for supernaturalism and against enlightened criticism.
III.
After the revolution which destroyed the political power of the old aristocracy, there came a further revolution the effect of which was to diminish largely its social predominance. We learn from the bitter sarcasms149 of Horace and Juvenal that under the empire wealth took the place of birth, if not, as those satirists pretend, of merit, as a passport to distinction and respect. Merely to possess a certain amount of money procured150 admission to the equestrian151 and senatorial orders; while a smaller pecuniary152 qualification entitled any Roman citizen to rank among the Honestiores as opposed to the Humiliores, the latter only being liable, if found guilty of certain offences, to the more atrocious forms of capital punishment, such as death by the wild beasts or by fire.314 Even a reputation for learning was supposed to be a marketable commodity; and when supreme power was held by a philoso207pher, the vulgar rich could still hope to attract his favourable notice by filling their houses with books.315 We also know from Juvenal, what indeed the analogy of modern times would readily suggest, that large fortunes were often rapidly made, and made by the cultivation of very sordid154 arts. Thus members of the most ignorant and superstitious classes were constantly rising to positions where they could set the tone of public opinion, or at least help to determine its direction.
The military organisation of the empire had the further effect of giving a high social status to retired155 centurions156—men probably recruited from the most barbarous provincial populations, and certainly more remarkable157 for their huge size than for their mental gifts.316 When one of these heroes heard a philosopher state that nothing can be made out of nothing, he would ask with a horse-laugh whether that was any reason for going without one’s dinner.317 On the other hand, when it came to be a question of supernatural agency, a man of this type would astonish the Jews themselves by his credulity. Imbued158 with the idea of personal authority, he readily fancied that anyone standing159 high in the favour of God could cure diseases from a distance by simply giving them the word of command to depart.318
A much more important factor in the social movement than those already mentioned was the ever-increasing influence of women. This probably stood at the lowest point to which it has ever fallen, during the classic age of Greek life and thought. In the history of Thucydides, so far as it forms a connected series of events, four times only during a period of nearly seventy years does a woman cross the scene. In each instance her apparition160 only lasts for a moment. In three of the four instances she is a queen or a princess, and belongs either to the half-barbarous kingdoms of northern Hellas or to wholly barbarous Thrace. In the one remaining instance208— that of the woman who helps some of the trapped Thebans to make their escape from Plataea—while her deed of mercy will live for ever, her name is for ever lost.319 But no sooner did philosophy abandon physics for ethics161 and religion than the importance of those subjects to women was perceived, first by Socrates, and after him by Xenophon and Plato. Women are said to have attended Plato’s lectures disguised as men. Women formed part of the circle which gathered round Epicurus in his suburban163 retreat. Others aspired164 not only to learn but to teach. Arêtê, the daughter of Aristippus, handed on the Cyrenaic doctrine166 to her son, the younger Aristippus. Hipparchia, the wife of Crates162 the Cynic, earned a place among the representatives of his school. But all these were exceptions; some of them belonged to the class of Hetaerae; and philosophy, although it might address itself to them, remained unaffected by their influence. The case was widely different in Rome, where women were far more highly honoured than in Greece;320 and even if the prominent part assigned to them in the legendary167 history of the city be a proof, among others, of its untrustworthiness, still that such stories should be thought worth inventing and preserving is an indirect proof of the extent to which feminine influence prevailed. With the loss of political liberty, their importance, as always happens at such a conjuncture, was considerably increased. Under a personal government there is far more scope for intrigue168 than where law is king; and as intriguers women are at least the209 equals of men. Moreover, they profited fully30 by the levelling tendencies of the age. One great service of the imperial jurisconsults was to remove some of the disabilities under which women formerly suffered. According to the old law, they were placed under male guardianship through their whole life, but this restraint was first reduced to a legal fiction by compelling the guardian107 to do what they wished, and at last it was entirely169 abolished. Their powers both of inheritance and bequest170 were extended; they frequently possessed171 immense wealth; and their wealth was sometimes expended172 for purposes of public munificence173. Their social freedom seems to have been unlimited174, and they formed combinations among themselves which probably served to increase their general influence.321
All these circumstances taken together would permit the Roman women to have opinions of their own if they liked, and would ensure a respectful hearing for whatever they had to say; while the men who had opinions to propagate would, for the same reason, be deeply interested in securing their adhesion. On the other hand, they received a good literary education, being sent apparently175 to the same schools as their brothers, and there made acquainted with, at least, the Latin poets.322 Thus they would possess the degree of culture necessary for readily receiving and transmitting new impressions. And we know, as a matter of fact, that many Roman ladies entered eagerly into the literary movement of the age, sharing the studies of their husbands, discoursing176 on questions of grammar, freely expressing their opinion on the relative merits of different poets, and even attempting authorship on their own account.323 Philosophy, as it was then taught, attracted a considerable share of their attention; and some great ladies were constantly attended by a Stoic177 professor, to whose lectures they listened seemingly with more patience210 than profit.324 One of their favourite studies was Plato’s Republic, according to Epictêtus, because it advocated a community of wives;325 or, as we may more charitably suggest, because it admitted women to an equality with men. But there is no evidence to prove that their inquisitiveness179 ever went to the length of questioning the foundations of religious faith; and we may fairly reckon their increasing influence among the forces which were tending to bring about an overwhelming religious revival among the educated classes.
In this connexion, some importance must also be attributed to the more indirect influence exercised by children; These did not form a particularly numerous class in the upper ranks of Roman society; but, to judge by what we see in modern France, the fewer there were of them the more attention were they likely to receive; and their interests, which like those of the other defenceless classes had been depressed180 or neglected under the aristocratic régime, were favoured by the reforming and levelling movement of the empire. One of Juvenal’s most popular satires181 is entirely devoted183 to the question of their education; and, in reference to this, the point of view most prominently put forward is the importance of the examples which are offered to them by their parents. Juvenal, himself a free-thinker, is exceedingly anxious that they should not be indoctrinated with superstitious opinions; but we may be sure that a different order of considerations would equally induce others to give their children a careful religious training, and to keep them at a distance from sceptical influences; while the spontaneous tendency of children to believe in the supernatural would render it easier to give them moral instruction under a religious form.
To complete our enumeration184 of the forces by which a new public opinion was being created, we must mention the slaves. Though still liable to be treated with great barbarity,211 the condition of this class was considerably ameliorated under the empire. Their lives and, in the case of women, their chastity, were protected by law; they were allowed by custom to accumulate property; they had always the hope of liberty before their eyes, for emancipations were frequent and were encouraged by the new legislation; they often lived on terms of the closest intimacy186 with their masters, and were sometimes educated enough to converse36 with them on subjects of general interest. Now a servile condition is more favourable than any other to religious ideas. It inculcates habits of unquestioning submission187 to authority; and by the miseries188 with which it is attended immensely enhances the value of consolatory189 beliefs, whether they take the form of faith in divine protection during this life, or of a compensation for its afflictions in the next. Moreover, a great majority of the Roman slaves came from those Eastern countries which were the native land of superstition, and thus served as missionaries of Oriental cults191 and creeds in the West, besides furnishing apt disciples192 to the teachers who came from Asia with the express object of securing converts to their religion in Rome. The part played by slaves in the diffusion of Christianity is well known; what we have to observe at present is that their influence must equally have told in favour of every other supernaturalist belief, and, to the same extent, against the rationalism of writers like Horace and Lucian.
Thus Roman civilisation, even when considered on its liberal, progressive, democratic side, seems to have necessarily favoured the growth and spread of superstition, because the new social strata which it turned up were less on their guard against unwarranted beliefs than the old governing aristocracies with their mingled195 conservatism and culture. But this was not all; and on viewing the empire from another side we shall find that under it all classes alike were exposed to conditions eminently inconsistent with that individual independence and capacity for forming a private judgment196 which212 had so honourably197 distinguished198 at least one class under the republican régime. If imperialism was in one sense a levelling and democratic system, in another sense it was intensely aristocratic, or rather timocratic. Superiorities of birth, race, age, and sex were everywhere tending to disappear, only that they might be replaced by the more ignoble199 superiorities of brute-force, of court-favour, and of wealth. The Palace set an example of caprice on the one side and of servility on the other which was faithfully followed through all grades of Roman society, less from a spirit of imitation than because circumstances were at work which made every rich man or woman the centre of a petty court consisting of voluntary dependents whose obsequiousness200 was rewarded by daily doles201 of food and money, by the occasional gift of a toga or even of a small farm, or by the hope of a handsome legacy202. Before daybreak the doors of a wealthy house were surrounded by a motley crowd, including not only famished203 clients but praetors, tribunes, opulent freedmen, and even ladies in their litters; all come nominally204 for the purpose of paying their respects to the master, but in reality to receive a small present of money. At a later hour, when the great man went abroad, he was attended by a troop of poor hangers-on, who, after trudging205 about for hours in his train and accompanying him home in the afternoon, often missed the place at his table which their assiduities were intended to secure. Even when it came, the invitation brought small comfort, as only the poorest food and the worst wine were set before the client, while he had the additional vexation of seeing his patron feasting on the choicest dishes and the most delicious vintages; and this was also the lot of the domestic philosopher whom some rich men regarded as an indispensable member of their retinue206.326 Of course those who wished for a larger share of the patron’s favours could only hope to win it by unstinted tokens of admiration207, deference208, or assent209; and213 probably many besides the master of thirty legions in the well-known story were invariably allowed to be right by the scholars with whom they condescended210 to dispute.
Besides the attentions lavished211 on every wealthy individual, those who had no children were especially courted, and that too by others who were as well off as themselves with the object of being remembered in their wills. So advantageous213 a position, indeed, did these orbi, as they were called, occupy, that among the higher classes there was extreme unwillingness214 to marry; although, as an encouragement to population, the father of three children enjoyed several substantial privileges. This circumstance, again, by preventing the perpetuation215 of wealthy families, and allowing their property to pass into the hands of degraded fortune-hunters, rendered impossible the consolidation216 of a new aristocracy which might have reorganised the traditions of liberal culture, and formed an effectual barrier against the downward pressure of despotism on the one side and the inroads of popular superstition on the other.
As a last illustration of the extent to which authority and subordination were pushed in Roman society, it may be mentioned that the better class of slaves were permitted to keep slaves for their own service. But whether the institution of slavery as a whole should be reckoned among the conditions favourable to authoritative beliefs is doubtful, as it was an element common to every period of antiquity. Perhaps, however paradoxical such an assertion may seem, the very frequency of emancipation185 gave increased strength to the feeling of dependence112 on an overruling personal power. A freedman could not forget that the most important event in his life was due, not to any natural law, but to the will or the caprice of a master; and this reflection must have confirmed his faith in the divine beings of whom he and his master were fellow-slaves.
214
IV.
We have now to show what new beliefs gained most ground, and what old beliefs were most successfully revived, through the combination of favourable conditions, an analysis of which has been attempted in the preceding pages. Among the host of creeds which at this period competed with one another for the favour of the rich or for the suffrages217 of the poor, there were some that possessed a marked advantage over their rivals in the struggle for existence. The worship of Nature considered as imaging the vicissitudes218 of human life, could not fail to be the most popular of any. All who desired a bond of sympathy uniting them with their fellow-subjects over the whole empire, and even with the tribes beyond its frontiers, might meet on this most universal ground. All who wished to combine excitement with devotion were attracted by the dramatic representation of birth and death, of bereavement219 and sorrow and searching, of purification through suffering, and triumphant220 reunion with the lost objects of affection in this or in another world. Inquisitive178 or innovating221 minds were gratified by admission to secrets a knowledge of which was believed to possess inestimable value. And the most conservative could see in such celebrations an acknowledgment, under other forms, of some divinity which had always been reverenced223 in their own home, perhaps even the more authentic224 reproduction of adventures already related to them as dim and uncertain traditions of the past. More than one such cultus, representing under the traits of personal love and loss and recovery, the death of vegetation in winter and its return to life in spring, was introduced from the East, and obtained a wide popularity through the empire. Long before the close of the republic, the worship of Cybele was established in Rome with the sanction of the Senate. Other Asiatic deities of a much less respectable character, Astarte and the so-called Syrian goddess, though not officially215 recognised, enjoyed a celebrity225 extending to the remotest corners of the western world.327 Still greater and more universal was the veneration226 bestowed227 on Isis and Serapis. From the prince to the peasant, from the philosopher to the ignorant girl, all classes united in doing homage229 to their power. Their mysteries were celebrated in the mountain valleys of the Tyrol, and probably created as much excitement among the people of that neighbourhood as the Ammergau passion-play does at present.328 An inscription48 has been discovered describing in minute detail an offering made to Isis by a Spanish matron in honour of her little daughter. It was a silver statue richly ornamented230 with precious stones, resembling, as our authority observes, what would now be presented to the Madonna,329 who indeed is probably no more than a Christian adaptation of the Egyptian goddess. And Plutarch, or another learned and ingenious writer whose work has come down to us under his name, devotes a long treatise231 to Isis and Osiris, in which the mythical232 history of the goddess is as thickly covered with allegorical interpretations234 as the statue dedicated235 to her by the Spanish lady was with emeralds and pearls.
Another form of naturalistic religion, fitted for universal acceptance by its appeals to common experience, was the worship of the Sun. It was probably as such that Mithras, a Syro-Persian deity236, obtained a success throughout the Roman empire which at one time seemed to balance the rising fortunes of Christianity. Adoration237 of the heavenly bodies was, indeed, very common during this period, and was probably connected with the extreme prevalence of astrological superstition. It would also harmonise perfectly with the still surviving Olympian religion of the old Hellenic aristocracy, and would profit by the support which philosophy since the time of Socrates had extended to this form of supernaturalist belief. But, perhaps, for that very reason the classes which had now216 become the ultimate arbiters238 of opinion, felt less sympathy with Mithras-worship and other kindred cults than with the Egyptian mysteries. These had a more recognisable bearing on their own daily life, and, like the Chthonian religions of old Greece, they included a reference to the immortality of the soul. Moreover, the climate of Europe, especially of western Europe, does not permit the sun to become an object of such excessive adoration as in southern Asia. Mithras-worship, then, is an example of the expansive force exhibited by Oriental ideas rather than of a faith which really satisfied the wants of the Roman world.
A far higher place must be assigned to Judaism among the competitors for the allegiance of Europe. The cosmopolitan importance at one time assumed by this religion has been considerably obscured, owing to the subsequent devolution of its part to Christianity. It is, however, by no means impossible that, but for the diversion created by the Gospel, and the disastrous239 consequences of their revolt against Rome, the Jews might have won the world to a purified form of their own monotheism. A few significant circumstances are recorded showing how much influence they had acquired, even in Rome, before the first preaching of Christianity. The first of these is to be found in Cicero’s defence of Flaccus. The latter was accused of appropriating part of the annual contributions sent to the temple at Jerusalem; and, in dealing240 with this charge, Cicero speaks of the Jews, who were naturally prejudiced against his client, as a powerful faction241 the hostility of which he is anxious not to provoke.330 Some twenty years later, a great advance has been made. Not only must the material interests of the Jews be respected, but a certain conformity242 to their religious prescriptions244 is considered a mark of good breeding, In one of his most amusing satires, Horace tells us how, being anxious to shake off a bore, he appeals for help to his friend Aristius Fuscus, and reminds him of217 some private business which they had to discuss together. Fuscus sees his object, and being mischievously245 determined to defeat it, answers: ‘Yes, I remember perfectly, but we must wait for some better opportunity; this is the thirtieth Sabbath, do you wish to insult the circumcised Jews?’ ‘I have no scruples248 on that point,‘ replies the impatient poet. ‘But I have,’ rejoins Fuscus,—‘a little weak-minded, one of the many, you know—excuse me, another time.‘331 Nor were the Jews content with the countenance249 thus freely accorded them. The same poet elsewhere intimates that whenever they found themselves in a majority, they took advantage of their superior strength to make proselytes by force.’332 And they pursued the good work to such purpose that a couple of generations later we find Seneca bitterly complaining that the vanquished250 had given laws to the victors, and that the customs of this abominable251 race were established over the whole earth.333 Evidence to the same effect is given by Philo Judaeus and Josephus, who inform us that the Jewish laws and customs were admired, imitated, and obeyed over the whole earth.334 Such assertions might be suspected of exaggeration, were they not, to a certain extent, confirmed by the references already quoted, to which others of the same kind may be added from later writers showing that it was a common practice among the Romans to abstain252 from work on the Sabbath, and even to celebrate it by praying, fasting, and lighting253 lamps, to visit the synagogues, to study the law of Moses, and to pay the yearly contribution of two drachmas to the temple at Jerusalem.335
Then as now, Judaism seems to have had a much greater attraction for women than for men; and this may be accounted218 for not only by the greater credulity of the female sex, which would equally predispose them in favour of every other new religion, but also by their natural sympathy with the domestic virtues which are such an amiable254 and interesting feature in the Jewish character. Josephus tells us that towards the beginning of Nero’s reign255 nearly all the women of Damascus were attached to Judaism;336 and he also mentions that Poppaea, the mistress and afterwards the wife of Nero, used her powerful influence for the protection of his compatriots, though whether she actually became a proselyte, as some have supposed, is doubtful.337 According to Ovid, the synagogues were much visited by Roman women, among others, apparently, by those of easy virtue17, for he alludes256 to them as resorts which the man of pleasure in search of a conquest will find it advantageous to frequent.338
The monotheism of the Jehovist religion would seem to have marked it out as the natural faith of a universal empire. Yet, strange to say, it was not by this element of Judaism that proselytes were most attracted. Our authorities are unanimous in speaking of the sabbath-observance as the most distinguishing trait of the Jews themselves, and the point in which they were most scrupulously257 imitated by their adherents; while the duty of contributing to the maintenance of the temple apparently stood next in popular estimation. But if this be true, it follows that the liberation of the spiritualistic element in Judaism from its ceremonial husk was a less essential condition to the success of Christianity than some have supposed. What the world objected to in Judaism was not its concrete, historical, practical side, but its exclusiveness, and the hatred258 for other nations which it was supposed to breed. What the new converts wished was to take the place of the Jews, to supersede259 them in the divine favour, not to improve on their law. It was useless to tell them that they were under no obligation to observe the sabbath, when the institu219tion of a day of rest was precisely what most fascinated them in the history of God’s relations with his chosen people. And it was equally useless to tell them that the hour had come when the Father should not be worshipped any more at Jerusalem but everywhere in spirit and in truth, when Jerusalem had become irrevocably associated in their minds with the establishment of a divine kingdom on this earth. Thus, while the religion of the Middle Ages reached its intensest expression in armed pilgrimages to Palestine, the religion of modern Puritanism has embodied260 itself by preference in the observance of what it still delights to call the sabbath.
It must not be supposed that the influx261 of Asiatic religions into Europe was attended by any loss of faith in the old gods of Greece and Italy, or by any neglect of their worship. The researches of Friedl?nder have proved the absolute erroneousness of such an idea, widely entertained as it has been. Innumerable monuments are in existence testifying to the continued authority of the Olympian divinities, and particularly of Jupiter, over the whole extent of the Roman empire. Ample endowments were still devoted to the maintenance of their service; their temples still smoked with sacrifices; their litanies were still repeated as a duty which it would have been scandalous to neglect; in all hours of public and private danger their help was still implored262, and acknowledged by the dedication263 of votive offerings when the danger was overcome; it was still believed, as in the days of Homer, that they occasionally manifested themselves on earth, signalising their presence by works of superhuman power.339 Nor was there anything anomalous264 in this peaceable co-existence of the old with the new faiths. So far back as we can trace the records both of Greek and Roman polytheism, they are remarkable for their receptive and assimilative capacity. Apollo and Artemis were imported into Greece from Lycia, Heracles and Aphrodite from Phoenicia, Dionysus and Ares probably from220 Thrace. Roman religion under its oldest form included both a Latin or Sabine and an Etruscan element; at a subsequent period it became Hellenised without losing anything of its grave and decorous character. In Greece, the elastic265 system of divine relationships was stretched a little further so as to make room for the new comers. The same system, when introduced into Roman mythology266, served to connect and enliven what previously267 had been so many rigid and isolated268 abstractions. With both, the supreme religious conception continued to be what it had been with their Aryan ancestors, that of a heavenly Father Jove; and the fashionable deities of the empire were received into the pantheon of Homer and Hesiod as recovered or adopted children of the same Olympian sire. The danger to Hellenistic polytheism was not from another form of the same type, but from a faith which should refuse to amalgamate269 with it on any terms; and in the environment created by Roman imperialism with its unifying271 and cosmopolitan character, such a faith, if it existed anywhere, could not fail in the long-run to supersede and extinguish its more tolerant rivals. But the immediate26 effect produced by giving free play to men’s religious instincts was not the concentration of their belief on a single object, or on new to the exclusion272 of old objects, but an extraordinary abundance and complexity273 of supernaturalism under all its forms. This general tendency, again, admits of being decomposed274 into two distinct currents, according as it was determined by the introduction of alien superstitions from without, or by the development of native and popular superstition from within. But, in each case, the retrogressive movement resulted from the same political revolution. At once critical and conservative, the city-aristocracies prevented the perennial275 germs of religious life from multiplying to any serious extent within the limits of their jurisdiction110, no less vigilantly276 than they prohibited the importation of its completed products from abroad. We have now to study the221 behaviour of these germs when the restraint to which they had formerly been subjected was lightened or withdrawn277.
V.
The old religions of Greece and Italy were essentially oracular. While inculcating the existence of supernatural beings, and prescribing the modes according to which such beings were to be worshipped, they paid most attention to the interpretation233 of the signs by which either future events in general, or the consequences of particular actions, were supposed to be divinely revealed. Of these intimations, some were given to the whole world, so that he who ran might read, others were reserved for certain favoured localities, and only communicated through the appointed ministers of the god. The Delphic oracle280 in particular enjoyed an enormous reputation both among Greeks and barbarians for guidance afforded under the latter conditions; and during a considerable period it may even be said to have directed the course of Hellenic civilisation. It was also under this form that supernatural religion suffered most injury from the great intellectual movement which followed the Persian wars. Men who had learned to study the constant sequences of Nature for themselves, and to shape their conduct according to fixed281 principles of prudence47 or of justice, either thought it irreverent to trouble the god about questions on which they were competent to form an opinion for themselves, or did not choose to place a well-considered scheme at the mercy of his possibly interested responses. That such a revolution occurred about the middle of the fifth century B.C., seems proved by the great change of tone in reference to this subject which one perceives on passing from Aeschylus to Sophocles. That anyone should question the veracity282 of an oracle is a supposition which never crosses the mind of the elder dramatist. A knowledge of augury283 counts among the greatest benefits222 conferred by Prometheus on mankind, and the Titan brings Zeus himself to terms by his acquaintance with the secrets of destiny. Sophocles, on the other hand, evidently has to deal with a sceptical generation, despising prophecies and needing to be warned of the fearful consequences brought about by neglecting their injunctions.
Probably few contributed so much to the change as Socrates, notwithstanding his general piety284 and the credulity which he exhibited on this particular point. For his ethical285 and dialectical training, combined with that careful study of facts which he so earnestly recommended, went very far towards making a consultation286 of the oracle superfluous287; and he did actually impress on his auditors288 the duty of dispensing289 with its assistance in all cases except those where a knowledge of the future was necessary and could not be otherwise obtained.340 Even so superstitious a believer as Xenophon improved on his master’s lessons in this respect, and instead of asking the Pythia whether he should take service with the younger Cyrus—as Socrates had advised—simply asked to what god he should sacrifice before starting on the expedition. Towards the beginning of our era, as is well known, the Greek oracles290 had fallen into complete neglect and silence.
But all this time the popular belief in omens291 had continued unaffected, and had apparently even increased. The peculiar292 Greek feeling known as Deisidaimonia is first satirised by Theophrastus, who defines it as cowardice293 with regard to the gods, and gives several amusing instances of the anxiety occasioned by its presence—all connected with the interpretation of omens—such as Aristophanes could hardly have failed to notice had they been usual in his time. Nor were such fancies confined to the ignorant classes. Although the Stoics294 cannot be accused of Deisidaimonia, they gave their powerful sanction to the belief in divination295, as has been already mentioned in our account of their philosophy. It223 would seem that whatever authority the great oracular centres had lost was simply handed over to lower and more popular forms of the same superstition.
In Rome, as well as in Greece, rationalism took the form of disbelief in divination. Here at least the Epicurean, the Academician, and, among the Stoics, the disciple193 of Panaetius, were all agreed. But as the sceptical movement began at a much later period in Rome than in the country where it first originated, so also did the supernaturalist reaction come later, the age of Augustus in the one corresponding very nearly with the age of Alexander in the other. Virgil and Livy are remarkable for their faith in omens; and although the latter complains of the general incredulity with which narratives296 of such events were received, his statements are to be taken rather as an index of what people thought in the age immediately preceding his own, than as an accurate description of contemporary opinion. Certainly nothing could be farther from the truth than to say that signs and prodigies297 were disregarded by the Romans under the empire. Even the cool and cautious Tacitus feels himself obliged to relate sundry298 marvellous incidents which seemed to accompany or to prefigure great historical catastrophes299; and the more credulous300 Suetonius has transcribed301 an immense number of such incidents from the pages of older chroniclers, besides informing us of the extreme attention paid even to trifling302 omens by Augustus.341
Meanwhile the recognised methods for looking into futurity continued to enjoy their old popularity, and that which relied on indications afforded by the entrails of sacrifices was practised with unabated confidence down to the time of Julian.342 Even faith in natural law, where it existed, accommodated itself to the prevalent superstition by taking the form of astrology; and it is well known what reliance the emperor Tiberius, for his time a singularly enlightened224 man, placed on predictions derived from observation of the starry303 heavens.
Subsequently, with the revival of Hellenism, the Greek oracles broke silence, and regained304 even more than their ancient reputation, as the increased facilities for locomotion305 now rendered them accessible from the remotest regions.343 Sometimes the miraculous306 character of their responses resulted in the conversion of hardened infidels. In this connexion, the following anecdote307 is related by Plutarch. A certain governor of Cilicia entertained serious doubts about the gods, and was still further confirmed in his impiety308 by the Epicureans who surrounded him. This man, for the purpose of throwing discredit on the famous oracle of Mopsus, sent a freedman to consult it, bearing a sealed letter containing a question with whose purport309 neither he nor any one else except the sender was acquainted. On arriving at the oracle, the messenger was admitted to pass a night within the temple, which was the method of consultation usually practised there. In his sleep a beautiful figure appeared to him, and after uttering the words ‘a black one,’ immediately vanished. On hearing this answer the governor fell on his knees in consternation310, and, opening the sealed tablet, showed his friends the question which it contained, ‘Shall I sacrifice a white or a black bull to thee?’ The Epicureans were confounded; while the governor offered up the prescribed sacrifice, and became thenceforward a constant adorer of Mopsus.344
Nothing, as Friedl?nder observes, shows so well what intense credulity prevailed at this time, with reference to phenomena of a marvellous description, as the success obtained by a celebrated impostor, Alexander of Abonuteichus, whose adventurous311 career may still be studied in one of Lucian’s liveliest pieces. Here it will be enough to mention225 that Alexander was a clever charlatan312 of imposing313 figure, winning manners, and boundless effrontery314, who established himself in Abonuteichus, a small town in Paphlagonia, on the southern shore of the Black Sea, where he made a trade of giving oracles in the name of Asclêpius. The god of healing was represented for the occasion by a large tame serpent fitted with a human head made of painted canvas and worked by horsehair strings315. Sometimes the oracular responses were delivered by the mouth of the god himself. This was managed with the help of a confederate who spoke316 through a tube connected with the false head. Such direct communications were, however, only granted as an exceptional favour and for a high price. In most instances the answer was given in writing, and the fee charged for it only amounted to a shilling of our money. Alexander had originally fixed on Abonuteichus, which was his native place and therefore well known to him, as the seat of his operations, on account of the extraordinary superstition of its inhabitants; but the people of the adjacent provinces soon showed themselves to be nowise behind his fellow-townsmen in their credulity. The fame of the new oracle spread over all Asia Minor317 and Thrace; and visitors thronged318 to it in such numbers as sometimes to produce a scarcity319 of provisions. The prophet’s gross receipts rose to an average of 3,000l. a year, and the office of interpreting his more ambiguous responses became so lucrative320 that the two exegêtes employed for this purpose paid each a talent a year (240l.) for the privilege of exercising it.
It was from the Epicureans, of whom we are told that there were a considerable number in these parts, that the most serious opposition to the impostor proceeded; but he contrived321 to silence their criticisms by denouncing them to the fanatical multitude as ‘atheists and Christians322.’ Towards Epicurus himself Alexander nourished an undying hatred; and when the oracle was consulted with regard to that226 philosopher’s fate, it made answer that he was ‘bound in leaden chains and seated in a morass323.’ The κ?ριαι δ?ξαι, or summary of the Epicurean creed100, he publicly burned and threw its ashes into the sea; and one unfortunate town which contained a large school of Epicureans he punished by refusing its inhabitants access to the oracle. On the other hand, according to Lucian, he was on the best of terms with the disciples of Plato, Chrysippus, and Pythagoras.345
At last tidings of the oracle made their way to Italy and Rome, where they created intense excitement, particularly among the leading men of the state. One of these, Rutilianus, a man of consular324 dignity and well known for his abject325 superstition, threw himself head-foremost into the fashionable delusion326. He sent off messenger after messenger in hot haste to the shrine327 of Asclêpius; and the wily Paphlagonian easily contrived that the reports which they carried back should still further inflame328 the curiosity and wonder of his noble devotee. But, in truth, no great refinement329 of imposture330 was needed to complete the capture of such a willing dupe. One of his questions was, what teacher should he employ to direct the studies of his son? Pythagoras and Homer were recommended in the oracular response. A few days afterwards, the boy died, much to the discomfiture331 of Alexander, whose enemies took the opportunity of triumphing over what seemed an irretrievable mistake. But Rutilianus himself came to the rescue. The oracle, he said, clearly foreshadowed his son’s death, by naming teachers who could only be found in the world below. Finally, on being consulted with regard to the choice of a wife, the oracle promptly332 recommended the daughter of Alexander and the Moon; for the prophet professed333 to have enjoyed the favours of that goddess in the same circumstances as Endymion. Rutilianus, who was at this time sixty years old, at once complied with the divine227 injunction, and celebrated his marriage by sacrificing whole hecatombs to his celestial334 mother-in-law.
With so powerful a protector, Alexander might safely bid his enemies defiance335. The governor of Bithynia had to entreat336 Lucian, whose life had been threatened by the impostor, to keep out of harm’s way. ‘Should anything happen to you,’ he said, ‘I could not afford to offend Rutilianus by bringing his father-in-law to justice.’ Even the best and wisest man then living yielded to the prevalent delusion. Marcus Aurelius, who was at that time fighting with the Marcomanni, was induced to act on an oracle from Abonuteichus, promising337 that if two lions were thrown into the Danube a great victory would be the result. The animals made their way safely to the opposite bank; but were beaten to death with clubs by the barbarians, who mistook them for some outlandish kind of wolf or dog; and the imperial army was shortly afterwards defeated with a loss of 20,000 men.346 Alexander helped himself out of the difficulty with the stale excuse that he had only foretold338 a victory, without saying which side should win. He was not more successful in determining the duration of his own life, which came to an end before he had completed seventy years, instead of lasting339, as he had prophesied340, for a hundred and fifty. This miscalculation, however, seems not to have impaired341 his reputation, for even after his death it was believed that a statue of him in the market-place of Parium in Mysia had the power of giving oracles.347
VI.
Another wide-spread superstition was the belief in prophetic or premonitory dreams. This was shared by some even among those who rejected supernatural religion,—a phenomenon not unparalleled at the present day. Thus the228 elder Pliny tells us how a soldier of the Praetorian Guard in Rome was cured of hydrophobia by a remedy revealed in a dream to his mother in Spain, and communicated by her to him. The letter describing it was written without any knowledge of his mishap342, and arrived just in time to save his life.348 And Pliny was himself induced by a dream to undertake the history of the Roman campaigns in Germany.349 Religious believers naturally put at least equal confidence in what they imagined to be revelations of the divine will. Galen, the great physician, often allowed himself to be guided by dreams in the treatment of his patients, and had every reason to congratulate himself on the result. The younger Pliny, Suetonius, Dion Cassius, and the emperors Augustus and Marcus Aurelius, were all influenced in a similar manner; and among these Dion, who stands last in point of time, shows by his repeated allusions343 to the subject that superstition, so far from diminishing, was continually on the increase.350
It was natural that the best methods of interpreting so useful a source of information should be greatly sought after, and that they should be systematised in treatises344 expressly devoted to the subject. One such work, the Oneirocritica of Artemid?rus, is still extant. It was composed towards the end of the second century, as its author tells us, at the direct and repeated command of Apollo. According to Artemid?rus, the general belief in prophecy and in the existence of providence must stand or fall with the belief in prophetic dreams. He looked on the compilation345 of his work as the fulfilment of a religious mission, and his whole life was devoted to collecting the materials for it. His good faith is, we are told, beyond question, his industry is enormous, and he even exercises considerable discrimination in selecting and elucidating346 the phenomena which are represented to us as229 manifestations348 of a supernatural interest in human affairs. Thus his beliefs may be taken as a fair gauge349 of the extent to which educated opinion had at that time become infected with vulgar superstition.351
Dreams, like oracles, were occasionally employed for the conversion of infidels. An incident of the kind is related by Aelian, a writer who flourished early in the third century, and who is remarkable, even in that age, for his bigoted350 orthodoxy. A certain man named Euphronius, he tells us, whose delight was to study the blasphemous351 nonsense of Epicurus, fell very ill of consumption, and sought in vain for help from the skill of the physicians. He was already at death’s door, when, as a last resource, his friends placed him in the temple of Asclêpius. There he dreamed that a priest came to him and said, ‘This man’s only chance of salvation352 is to burn the impious books of Epicurus, knead the ashes up with wax, and use the mixture as a poultice for his chest and stomach.’ On awakening353, he followed the divine prescription243, was restored to health, and became a model of piety for the rest of his life. The same author gives us a striking instance of prayer answered, also redounding354 to the credit of Asclêpius, the object of whose favour is, however, on this occasion not a human being but a fighting-cock. The scene is laid at Tanagra, where the bird in question, having had his foot hurt, and evidently acting356 under the influence of divine inspiration, joins a choir357 who are singing the praises of Asclêpius, contributing his share to the sacred concert, and, to the best of his ability, keeping time with the other performers. ‘This he did, standing on one leg and stretching out the other, as if to show its pitiable condition. So he sang to his saviour358 as far as the strength of his voice would permit, and prayed that he might recover the use of his limb.’ The petition is granted,230 whereupon our hero claps his wings and struts359 about ‘with outstretched neck and nodding crest360 like a proud warrior361, thus proclaiming the power of providence over irrational362 animals.’352
Aelian mentions other remarkable examples of the piety displayed by brutes363. ‘Elephants worship the sun, stretching out their trunks to it like hands when it rises while men doubt the existence of the gods, or at least their care for us.’ ‘There is an island in the Black Sea, sacred to Heracles, where the mice touch nothing that belongs to the god. When the grapes which are intended to be used for his sacrifices begin to ripen365, they quit the island in order to escape the temptation of nibbling366 at them, coming back when the vintage is over. Hippo, Diagoras, Herostratus, and other enemies of the gods would, no doubt, spare these grapes just as little as anything else that was consecrated367 to their use.’353
It is, perhaps, characteristic of the times that Aelian’s stories should redound355 more especially to the credit of Asclêpius and Heracles, who were not gods of the first order, but demi-gods or deified mortals. Their worship, like that of the Nature-powers connected with earth rather than with heaven, belongs particularly to the popular religion, and seems to have been repressed or restrained in societies organised on aristocratic principles. And as more immediate products of the forces by which supernaturalist beliefs are created and maintained, such divinities would profit by the free scope now given to popular predilections368. In their case also, as with the earth-goddesses Dêmêtêr and Isis, a more immediate and affectionate relation might be established between the believer and the object of his worship than had been possible in reference to the chief Olympian gods. Heracles had lived the life of a man, his activity had been almost uniformly beneficent, and so he was universally invoked369, as a helper and healer, in the sick-chamber370 no less231 than on the storm-tost ship.354 Asclêpius was still more obviously the natural refuge of those who were afflicted371 with any bodily disease, and, in a time of profound peace, this was of all calamities372 the most likely to turn men’s thoughts towards a supernatural protector. Hence we find that where, apart from Christianity, the religious enthusiasm of the second century reaches its intensest expression, which is in the writings of the celebrated rhetor Aristeides, Asclêpius comes in for the largest share of devotional feeling. During an illness which continued through thirteen years, Aristeides sought day and night for help and inspiration from the god. It came at last in the usual form of a prescription communicated through a dream. Both on this and on other occasions, the excitement of an overwrought imagination combined with an exorbitant373 vanity made the sophist believe himself to be preferred above all other men as an object of the divine favour. At one time he would see himself admitted in his dreams to an exchange of compliments with Asclêpius; at other times he would convert the most ordinary incidents into signs of supernatural protection. Thus his foster-sister having died on the day of his own recovery from a dangerous epidemic374, it was revealed to him in a dream that her life had been accepted as a ransom375 for his. We are told that the monks376 of the Middle Ages could not refrain from expressing their indignant contempt for the insane credulity of Aristeides, in marginal notes on his orations378; but the last-mentioned incident, at least, is closely paralleled by the well-known story that a devout379 lady was once permitted to redeem380 the life of Pius IX. by the sacrifice of her own.355
Besides this increasing reverence222 paid to the deified mortals of ancient mythology, the custom of bestowing381 divine honours on illustrious men after or even before their death, found new scope for its exercise under the empire.232 Among the manifestations of this tendency, the apotheosis382 of the emperors themselves, of course, ranks first. We are accustomed to think of it as part of the machinery383 of despotism, surrounded by official ceremonies and enforced by cruel punishments; but, in fact, it first originated in a spontaneous movement of popular feeling; and in the case of Marcus Aurelius at least, it was maintained for a whole century, if not longer, by the mere force of public opinion. And many prophecies (which, as usual, came true) were made on the strength of revelations received from him in dreams.356 But a much stronger proof of the prevalent tendency is furnished by the apotheosis of Antinous. In its origin this may be attributed to the caprice of a voluptuous384 despot; but its perpetuation long after the motives385 of flattery or of fear had ceased to act, shows that the worship of a beautiful youth, who was believed to have given his life for another, satisfied a deep-seated craving97 of the age. It is possible that, in this and other instances, the deified mortal may have passed for the representative or incarnation of some god who was already believed to have led an earthly existence, and might therefore readily revisit the scene of his former activity. Thus Antinous constantly appears with the attributes of Dionysus; and Apollonius of Tyana, the celebrated Pythagorean prophet of the first century, was worshipped at Ephesus in the time of Lactantius under the name of Heracles Alexicacus, that is, Heracles the defender386 from evil.357
233
VII.
We now pass to a form of supernaturalism more characteristic than any other of the direction which men’s thoughts were taking under the Roman empire, and more or less profoundly connected with all the other religious manifestations which have hitherto engaged our attention. This is the doctrine of immortality, a doctrine far more generally accepted in the first centuries of the Christian era, but quite apart from Christian influence, than is supposed by most persons. Here our most trustworthy information is derived from the epigraphic monuments. But for them, we might have continued to believe that public opinion on this subject was faithfully reflected by a few sceptical writers, who were, in truth, speaking only for themselves and for the numerically insignificant387 class to which they belonged. Not that the inscriptions all point one way and the books another way. On the contrary, there are epitaphs most distinctly repudiating388 the notion of a life beyond the grave, just as there are expressions let fall by men of learning which show that they accepted it as true. As much might be expected from the divisions then prevailing389 in the speculative world. Of all philosophical390 systems, Epicureanism was, at this time, the most widely diffused: its adherents rejected the belief in another world as a mischievous246 delusion; and many of them seem to have carefully provided that their convictions should be recorded on their tombs. The monument of one such philosopher, dedicated to eternal sleep, is still extant; others are dedicated to safe repose391; others, again, speak of the opposite belief as a vain imagination. A favourite epitaph with persons of this school runs as follows:—‘I was nothing and became, I was and am no more, so much is true. To speak otherwise is to lie, for I shall be no more.’358 Sometimes,234 from the depths of their unconsciousness, the dead are made to express indifference to the loss of existence. Sometimes, in what was popularly believed to be the spirit of Epicureanism, but was, in reality, most alien to it, they exhort392 the passer-by to indulge his appetites freely, since death is the end of all.
It must further be noted393 that disbelief in a future life, as a philosophical principle, was not confined to the Epicureans. All philosophers except the Platonists and Pythagoreans were materialists; and no logical thinker who had once applied394 his mind to the subject could accept such an absurdity395 as the everlasting396 duration of a complex corporeal397 substance, whether consisting of gaseous398 or of fiery399 matter. A majority of the Stoics allowed the soul to continue its individual existence until, in common with the whole world, it should be reabsorbed into the elemental fire; but others looked forward to a more speedy extinction400, without ceasing on that account to consider themselves orthodox members of the school. Of these the most remarkable instance is Marcus Aurelius. The great emperor was not blind to what seemed the enormous injustice401 of death, and did not quite see his way to reconciling it with the Stoic belief in a beneficent providence; but the difficulty of finding room for so many ghosts, and perhaps also the Heracleitean dogma of perpetual transformation402, led him to renounce403 whatever hope he may at one time have cherished of entering on a new existence in some better world.359 A similar consequence was involved in the principles of the Peripatetic404 philosophy; and Alexander of Aphrodisias, the famous Aristotelian commentator405, who flourished about 200 A.D., affirms the perishable406 nature of the soul on his own account, and, with perfect justice, attributes the same belief to Aristotle himself.360
Among the scientific and literary men who were not pledged to any particular school, we find the elder Pliny rejecting the belief in immortality, not only as irrational but235 as the reverse of consolatory. It robs us, he declares, of Nature’s most especial boon407, which is death, and doubles the pangs408 of dissolution by the prospect of continued existence elsewhere.361 Quintilian leaves the question undecided;362 Tacitus expresses himself doubtfully;363 and Galen, whose great physiological409 knowledge enabled him to see how fallacious were Plato’s arguments, while his philosophical training equally separated him from the materialists, also refuses to pronounce in favour of either side.364 What Juvenal thought is uncertain; but, from his general tone, we may conjecture410 that he leant to the negative side.365
Against these we have to set the confident expressions of belief in a future life employed by all the Platonists and Pythagoreans, and by some of the Stoic school. But their doctrines411 on the subject will be most advantageously explained when we come to deal with the religious philosophy of the age as a whole. What we have now to examine is the general condition of popular belief as evinced by the character of the funereal412 monuments erected413 in the time of the empire. Our authorities are agreed in stating that the majority of these bear witness to a wide-spread and ever-growing faith in immortality, sometimes conveyed under the form of inscriptions, sometimes under that of figured reliefs, sometimes more na?vely signified by articles placed in the tomb for use in another world. ‘I am waiting for my husband,’ is the inscription placed over his dead wife by one who was, like her, an enfranchised414 slave. Elsewhere a widow ‘commends her departed husband to the gods of the underworld, and prays that they will allow his spirit to revisit her in the hours of the night.’366 ‘In death thou art not dead,’ are the words deciphered on one mouldering415 stone. ‘No,’ says a father to a son whom he had lost in Numidia,236 ‘thou hast not gone down to the abode416 of the Manes but risen to the stars of heaven.’ At Doxato, near Philippi in Macedonia, ‘a mother has graven on the tomb of her child: “We are crushed by a cruel blow, but thou hast renewed thy being and art dwelling417 in the Elysian fields.”’367 This conception of the future world as a heavenly and happy abode where human souls are received into the society of the gods, recurs418 with especial frequency in the Greek epitaphs, but is also met with in Latin-speaking countries. And, considering how great a part the worship of departed spirits plays in all primitive religions, just such a tendency might be expected to show itself at such a time, if, as we have contended, the conditions of society under the empire were calculated to set free the original forces by which popular faith is created. It seems, therefore, rather arbitrary to assume, as Friedl?nder does,368 that the movement in question was entirely due to Platonic419 influence,—especially considering that there are distinct traces of it to be found in Pindar;—although at the same time we may grant that it was powerfully fostered by Plato’s teaching, and received a fresh impulse from the reconstitution of his philosophy in the third century of our era.
Side by side, however, with these exalted420 aspirations421, the old popular belief in a subterranean422 abode of souls survived under its very crudest forms; and here also modern explorations have brought to light very surprising evidence of the strength with which the grotesque423 idea of Charon the Stygian ferryman still kept its hold on the imagination of uneducated people. Originally peculiar to Greece, where it still exists under a slightly altered form, this superstition penetrated424 into the West at a comparatively early period. Thus in the tombs of Campania alone many hundred skeletons have been found with bronze coins in their mouths, placed there to pay their passage across the Styx; and explorations at Praeneste show that this custom reaches back to the middle of the237 fourth century B.C. We also learn from Lucian that, in his time, the old animistic beliefs were entertained to the extent of burning or burying the clothes, ornaments425, and other appurtenances of deceased persons along with their bodies, under the idea that the owners required them for use in the other world; and it is to such deposits that our museums of classical antiquity owe the greater part of their contents.369
When the belief in a future life assumes the form last mentioned, it is, as we have said, simply a survival of the most primitive animism, not testifying to any religious reaction at the time when it can be proved to have flourished. It is introduced in the present connexion merely to show what ideas were current among those classes to whose opinions Roman civilisation was gradually giving irresistible426 weight. How the minds of the richer and more educated classes were affected by this underlying427 stratum428, is shown by the nature of the figured representations with which their last abodes429 were ornamented. Everyone has been made tolerably familiar with these through the sculptured sarcophagi preserved in our museums; but, from their symbolical430 character, the significance of the reliefs with which they are decorated is not obvious at first sight; and some of the mythical adventures thus embodied may have been wrought without any reference to the destination of the dark and narrow chamber which they enclosed, or may even have been intended to divert the imagination from sad thoughts by the luxuriance of rushing life and joy and victory which they displayed; but after making every possible deduction431 on this score, there remain many others offering a deeper source of consolation432 to the bereaved433 survivor434 by the pictured promise of future reunion with those whom he had loved and lost. One favourite subject is the visit of Diana to the sleeping Endymion, by which is clearly foreshadowed an awakening to divine felicity from the sleep of death. The rape364 of Proserpine, followed by238 her restoration to the upper world, conveys a similar intention; as also does the fate of Adonis, since he too was believed to have risen from the dead. The marriage of Bacchus and Ariadne unquestionably symbolises the exchange of an earthly for a heavenly life; and the scenes of Bacchic revelry with which the interior of some tombs is decorated, were, to the imagination of those who designed them, no unbecoming image of the joys awaiting a blessed soul in its celestial abode. An inscription of which we have already quoted the opening words expresses in terms that hope of companionship with the joyous435 band of Dionysus at which the plastic representations can but mutely hint. ‘Now in a flowery meadow,’ says the mourning mother of Doxato to her child, ‘the priestess marked with a sacred seal is enrolling436 thee in the troop of Bacchus, where the Naiads that bear the sacred baskets claim thee as their fellow to lead the solemn procession by the light of torches.’ At the same time, a tenderer or graver note is often struck. The stories of Admêtus and Alcestis, of Protesilaus and Laodameia, point to a renewal437 of conjugal438 love beyond the grave. What were formerly supposed to be scenes representing the eternal farewell of husband and wife are, in the opinion of modern archaeologists, pictures of their restoration to each other’s arms. Rising higher still, Achilles among the daughters of Lycomêdes probably typifies the liberation of an immortal68 spirit from the seductions of sense. The labours of Heracles recall his apotheosis, and seem to show that a life of noble effort shall be rewarded hereafter. The battle of the Amazons is an allegory of strife439 with and triumph over the temptations of earthly delight. Another often-recurring theme, the hunting of the Calydonian boar, may mean the soul’s victory over death; but this explanation is offered only as a conjecture of the present writer’s.
A remarkable circumstance connected with the evidence afforded by the figured monuments is its progressive cha239racter. According to M. Ravaisson, ‘As time goes on, the indications of belief in a future life, instead of becoming fainter, grow clearer and more distinct. More and more exalted ideas are formed of the soul’s destiny, and ever increasing honours are paid to the dead. Moreover, these ideas and practices are extended so as to cover a greater number of individuals. At first it would seem that the only persons whose fate excites any interest are kings and heroes, the children or the descendants of the gods; in the course of time many others, and at last all, or nearly all, are admitted to a share in the same regard. The ancient principle that happiness is reserved for those who resemble the gods remains441 unchanged; but the notion of what constitutes resemblance to the gods, or in other words perfection, gradually becomes so modified, that all men may aspire165 to reach it.’370
We are here in presence of a phenomenon like that to which attention was invited in an early chapter of this work.371 The belief in immortality, entertained under a gloomy and repulsive442 form by the uneducated, is taken up by the higher classes, brought into contact with their more generous ideas, broadened, deepened, purified, and finally made the basis of a new religion. Nevertheless, in the present instance at least, all was not clear gain; and the faith which smiles on us from storied sarcophagus and mural relief, or pleads for our sympathy in epitaphs more enduring than the hope which240 they enshrine, had also its grotesque and hideous443 side, for an expression of which we must turn to literature again.
Once credited with a continued existence, the departed spirit would not remain in the Hades or the Elysium provided for it by the justice or the piety, of the survivor, but persisted in returning to this world and manifesting a most uncomfortable interest in its affairs; or, even if willing to remain at rest, it was liable to be dragged back by incantations, and compelled to reveal the secrets of futurity at the bidding of an unprincipled magician. What science and good feeling combined have proved unable to keep down among ourselves, naturally raged with unmitigated virulence444 at a time when the primitive barbarism and superstition were only covered over by a crust of culture which at many points was growing thinner every day. Among Latin writers, the younger Pliny, Suetonius, and Apuleius, among Greek writers, Plutarch, Pausanias, Maximus Tyrius, Philostratus, and Dion Cassius, afford unequivocal evidence of their belief and the belief of their contemporaries in ghostly apparitions445; and Lucian, while rejecting ghost-stories on his own account, speaks as if they were implicitly446 accepted even in philosophical circles.372 Still more abundant is the evidence proving the frequency of attempts made to evoke447 spirits by means of magical incantations. Horace’s Canidia boasts that she can raise the dead even after their bodies have been burned.373 Lucan describes the process of conjuring448 up a ghost at length; and it is thought that he inserted the whole scene in his poem as a satire182 on the emperor Nero, who is known to have been addicted449 to such practices, as were also his successors, Didius Julianus, Caracalla, and Elagabalus. And that the same art was cultivated by private persons is clear from the allusions made to it by Quintilian, Apuleius, Tertullian, and Heliod?rus.374
241
VIII.
We have now to consider how the philosophy of the empire was affected by the atmosphere of supernaturalism which surrounded it on every side. Of the Epicureans it need only be said that they were true to their trust, and upheld the principles of their founder88 so long as the sect450 itself continued to exist. But we may reckon it as a first consequence of the religious reaction, that, after Lucretius, Epicureanism failed to secure the adhesion of a single eminent131 man, and that, even as a popular philosophy, it suffered by the competition of other systems, among which Stoicism long maintained the foremost place. We showed in a former chapter how strong a religious colouring was given to their teaching by the earlier Stoics, especially Cleanthes. It would appear, however, that Panaetius discarded many of the superstitions accepted by his predecessors451, possibly as a concession453 to that revived Scepticism which was so vigorously advocated just before his time; and it was under the form imposed on it by this philosopher that Stoicism first gained acceptance in Roman society; if indeed the rationalism of Panaetius was not itself partly determined by his intercourse with such liberal minds as Laelius and the younger Scipio. But Posidonius, his successor, already marks the beginning of a reactionary movement; and, in Virgil, Stoical opinions are closely associated with an unquestioning acceptance of the ancient Roman faith. The attitude of Seneca is much more independent; he is full of contempt for popular superstition, and his god is not very distinguishable from the order of Nature. Yet his tendency towards clothing philosophical instruction in religious terms deserves notice, as a symptom of the superior facility with which such terms lent themselves to didactic purposes. Acceptance of the universal order became more intelligible454 under the name of obedience455 to a divine decree; the unity105 of the human race and the obligations resulting therefrom242 impressed themselves more deeply on the imaginations of those who heard that men are all members of one body; the supremacy of reason over appetite became more assured when its dictates456 were interpreted as the voice of a god within the soul.375
The religious tendency of Seneca’s philosophy appears rather in his psychology457 than in his metaphysics, in the stress which he lays on human immortality rather than in his discussions on creation and divine providence. His statements on this subject are not, indeed, very consistent, death being sometimes spoken of as the end of consciousness, and at other times, as the beginning of a new life, the ‘birthday of eternity458,’ to quote a phrase afterwards adopted by Christian preachers. Nor can we be absolutely certain that the promised eternity is not merely another way of expressing the soul’s absorption into and identification with the fiery element whence it was originally derived. This, however, is an ambiguity459 to be met with in other doctrines of a spiritual existence after death, nor is it entirely absent from the language even of Christian theologians. What deserves attention is that, whether the future life spoken of by Seneca be taken in a literal or in a figurative sense, it is equally intended to lead our thoughts away from the world of sensible experience to a more ideal order of things; and, to that extent, it falls in with the more general religious movement of the age. Whether Zeller is, for that reason, justified460 in speaking of him as a Platonising Stoic seems more questionable461; for the Stoics always agreed with Plato in holding that the soul is distinct from and superior to the body, and that it is consubstantial with the animating462 principle of Nature. The same circumstances which were elsewhere leading to a revival of Platonism, equally tended to develope this side of Stoicism, but it seems needless to seek for a closer connexion between the two phenomena.376
243
On passing from Seneca to Epictêtus, we find that the religious element has received a considerable accession of strength, so considerable, indeed, that the simple progress of time will not altogether account for it. Something is due to the superior devoutness463 of the Eastern mind—Epictêtus was a Phrygian,—and still more to the difference in station between the two philosophers. As a noble, Seneca belonged to the class which was naturally most inclined to adopt an independent attitude towards the popular beliefs; as a slave, Epictêtus belonged to the class which was naturally most amenable464 to their authority. It was, however, no accident that philosophy should, at a distance of only a generation, be represented by two such widely contrasted individuals; for the whole tendency of Roman civilisation was, as we have seen, to bring the Oriental element and the servile element of society into ever-increasing prominence465. Nothing proves the ascendency of religious considerations in the mind of Epictêtus more strongly than his aversion from the physical enquiries which were eagerly prosecuted466 by Seneca. Nature interests him solely467 as a manifestation347 of divine wisdom and goodness. As a consequence of this intensified468 religious feeling, the Stoic theory of natural law is transformed, with Epictêtus, into an expression of filial submission to the divine will, while the Stoic teleology469 becomes an enumeration of the blessings470 showered by providence on man. In the latter respect, his standpoint approaches very near to that of Socrates, who, although a free-born Athenian citizen, belonged, like him, to the poorer classes, and sympathised deeply with their feeling of dependence on supernatural protection,—a remark which also applies to the humble471 day-labourer244 Cleanthes. Epictêtus also shares the idea, characteristic of the Platonic rather than of the Xenophontic Socrates, that the philosopher is entrusted472 with a mission from God, without which it would be perilous473 for him to undertake the office of a teacher, and which, in the discharge of that office, he should keep constantly before his eyes. But the dialectical element which with Socrates had furnished so strong a counterpoise to the authoritative and traditional side of his philosophy, is almost entirely wanting in the discourses474 of his imitator, and the little of it which he admits is valued only as a means of silencing the Sceptics. On the other hand, the weakness and insignificance475 of human nature, considered on the individual side, are abundantly illustrated477, and contemptuous diminutives478 are habitually479 used in speaking of its component480 parts.378 It would seem that the attitude of prostration481 before an overwhelming external authority prevented Epictêtus from looking very favourably482 on the doctrine of individual immortality; and even if he accepted that doctrine, which seems in the highest degree improbable, it held a much less important place in his thoughts than in those of Cicero and Seneca. It would seem, also, that the Stoic materialism483 was betraying its fundamental incompatibility484 with a hope originally borrowed from the idealism of Plato. Nor was this renunciation inconsistent with the ethical dualism which drew a sharp line of distinction between flesh and spirit in the constitution of man, for the superiority of the spirit arose from its identity with the divine substance into which it was destined to be reabsorbed after death.379
If, in the philosophy of Epictêtus, physics and morality become entirely identified with religion, religion, on the other hand, remains entirely natural and moral. It is an offering245 not of prayer but of praise, a service less of ceremonies and sacrifices than of virtuous485 deeds, a study of conscience rather than of prophecy, a faith not so much in supernatural portents486 as in providential law.380 But in arriving at Marcus Aurelius, we have overstepped the line which divides rational religion from superstition. Instances of the good emperor’s astonishing credulity have already been given and need not be repeated. They are enough to show that his lavish212 expenditure487 on public worship was dictated488 by something more than a regard for established customs. We know, indeed, that the hecatombs with which his victories were celebrated gave occasion to profane489 merriment even in the society of that period. On one occasion, a petition was passed from hand to hand, purporting490 to be addressed to the emperor by the white oxen, and deprecating his success on the ground that if he won they were lost.381 Yet the same Marcus Aurelius, in speaking of his predecessor452 Antoninus, expressly specifies491 piety without superstition as one of the traits in his character which were most deserving of imitation.382 And, undoubtedly493, the mental condition of those who were continually in an agony of fear lest they should incur494 the divine displeasure by some purely arbitrary act or omission495, or who supposed that the gods might be bribed496 into furthering their iniquitous497 enterprises, was beyond all comparison further removed from true wisdom than the condition of those who believed themselves to be favoured by particular manifestations of the divine beneficence, perhaps as a recompense for their earnest attempts to lead a just and holy life. We may conclude, then, that philosophy, while injuriously affected by the supernaturalist movement, still protected its disciples against the more virulent498 forms of superstition, and by entering into combination with the popular belief, raised it to a higher level of feeling and of thought. It was not, however, by Stoicism that the final reconciliation499 of ancient religion with philosophy could be246 accomplished500, but by certain older forms of speculation501 which we now proceed to study.
In the preceding chapter we attempted to show that the tendency of Roman thought, when brought into contact with the Greek systems, was to resolve them into their component elements, or to throw them back on their historical antecedents. As a result of this dissolving process, the Stoicism of the second century split up into a number of more or less conflicting principles, each of which received exclusive prominence according to the changeful mood of the thinker who resorted to philosophy for consolation or for help. Stoicism had originally embraced the dynamism of Heracleitus, the teleology of Socrates, the physical morality of Prodicus and his Cynic successors, the systematising dialectic of Aristotle, the psychism502 of Plato and the Pythagoreans, and, to a certain extent, the superstitions of popular mythology. With Epictêtus, we find the Cynic and the Socratic elements most clearly developed, with Marcus Aurelius, the Socratic and the Heracleitean, the latter being especially strong in the meditations503 written shortly before his death. In the eastern provinces of the empire, Cynicism was preached as an independent system of morality, and obtained great success by its popular and propagandist character. Dion Chrysostom, a much-admired lecturer of the second century, speaks with enthusiasm of its most famous representative Diogenes, and recounts, with evident gusto, some of the most shameless actions attributed, perhaps falsely, to that eccentric philosopher.383 And the popular rhetorician Maximus Tyrius, although a professed Platonist, places the Cynic life above every other.384 But the traditions of Cynicism were thoroughly504 opposed to the prevalent polytheism; and its whole attitude was calculated to repel505 rather than to attract minds penetrated with the enthusiastic spirit of the age. To all such the Neo-Pythagorean doctrine came as a welcome revelation.
247
After its temporary adoption by the Academy, Pythagoreanism had ceased to exist as an independent system, but continued to lead a sort of underground life in connexion with the Orphic and Dionysiac mysteries. When or where it reappeared under a philosophical form cannot be certainly determined. Zeller fixes on the beginning of the first century B.C. as the most probable date, and on Alexandria as the most probable scene of its renewed speculative activity.385 Some fifty years later, we find Pythagorean teachers in Rome, and traces of their influence are plainly discernible in the Augustan literature. Under its earliest form, the new system was an attempt to combine mathematical mysticism with principles borrowed from the Stoic and other philosophies; or perhaps it was simply a return to the poetical506 syncretism of Empedocles. Although composed of fire and air, the soul is declared to be immortal; and lessons of holiness are accompanied by an elaborate code of rules for ceremonial purification. The elder Sextius, from whom Seneca derived much of his ethical enthusiasm, probably belonged to this school. He taught a morality apparently identical with that of Stoicism in every point except the inculcation of abstinence from animal food.386 To this might be added the practice of nightly self-confession—an examination from the moral point of view of how one’s whole day has been spent,—were we certain that the Stoics did not originate it for themselves.387
The alliance between Neo-Pythagoreanism and Stoicism did not last long. Their fundamental principles were too radically507 opposed to admit of any reconciliation, except what could be effected by the absorption of both into a more comprehensive system. And Roman Stoicism, at least, was too practical, too scientific, too sane377, to assimilate what must have seemed a curious amalgam270 of mathematical jugglery508 and dreamy asceticism509; while the reputation of belonging to248 what passed for a secret society would be regarded with particular dread510 in the vicinity of the imperial court,—it was, in fact, for this particular reason that the elder Seneca persuaded his son to renounce the vegetarian511 diet which Sotion had induced him to adopt,—and the suspicious hostility of the public authorities may have had something to do with the speedy disappearance512 of Neo-Pythagoreanism from Rome.388 On the other hand, so coarsely materialistic513 and utilitarian514 a doctrine as that of the Porch, must have been equally repulsive to the spiritualism which, while it discerned a deep kinship permeating515 all forms of animal existence, saw in the outward conditions of that existence only the prison or the tomb where a heaven-born exile lay immured516 in expiation517 of the guilt153 that had driven him from his former and well-nigh forgotten abode. Hence, after Seneca, we find the two schools pursuing divergent directions, the naturalism of the one becoming more and more contrasted with the spiritualism of the other. It has been mentioned how emphatically Marcus Aurelius rejected the doctrine of a future life, which, perhaps, had been brought under his notice as a tenet of the Neo-Pythagoreans. The latter, on their side, abandoned the Stoic cosmology for the more congenial metaphysics of Plato, which they enriched with some elements from Aristotle’s system, but without in the least acknowledging their obligations to those two illustrious masters. On the contrary, they professed to derive20 their hidden wisdom from certain alleged518 writings of Pythagoras and his earlier disciples, which, with the disregard for veracity not uncommon519 among mystics, they did not scruple247 to forge wholesale520. As a consequence of their unfortunate activity, literature was encumbered521 with a mass of worthless productions, of which many fragments still survive, mixed, perhaps, with some genuine relics522 of old Italiote speculation, the extrication523 of which is, however, a task of almost insuperable difficulty.
249
It is only as a religious philosophy that Neo-Pythagoreanism can interest us here. Considered in this light, the principles of its adherents may be summed up under two heads. First, they taught the separate existence of spirit as opposed to matter. Unlike the Stoics, they distinguished between God and Nature, although they were not agreed as to whether their Supreme Being transcended524 the world or was immanent in it. This, however, did not interfere525 with their fundamental contention526, for either alternative is consistent with his absolute immateriality. In like manner, the human soul is absolutely independent of the body which it animates527; it has existed and will continue to exist for ever. The whole object of ethics, or rather of religion, is to enforce and illustrate476 this independence, to prevent the soul from becoming attached to its prison-house by indulgence in sensual pleasures, to guard its habitation against defiling528 contact with the more offensive forms of material impurity529. Hence their recommendation of abstinence from wine, from animal food, and from marriage, their provisions for personal cleanliness, their use of linen530 instead of woollen garments, under the idea that a vegetable is purer than an animal tissue. The second article of the Pythagorean creed is that spirit, being superior to matter, has the power of interfering531 with and controlling its movements, that, being above space and time, it can be made manifest without any regard to the conditions which they ordinarily impose. To what an extent this belief was carried, is shown by the stories told of Pythagoras, the supposed founder of the school, and Apollonius of Tyana, its still greater representative in the first century of our era. Both were credited with an extraordinary power of working miracles and of predicting future events; but, contrary to the usual custom of mythologers, a larger measure of this power was ascribed to the one who lived in a more advanced stage of civilisation, and the composition of whose biography was separated by a250 comparatively short interval532 from the events which it professes533 to relate.389
IX.
The most important result of the old Pythagorean teaching was, that it contributed a large element—somewhat too large, indeed,—to Plato’s philosophy. Neo-Pythagoreanism bears precisely the same relation to that revived Platonism which was the last outcome of ancient thought. It will be remembered that the great controversy534 between Stoicism and Scepticism, which for centuries divided the schools of Athens, and was passed on by them to Cicero and his contemporaries, seemed tending towards a reconciliation based on a return to the founder of the Academy, when, from whatever cause, Greek speculation came to a halt, which continued until the last third of the first century after Christ. At that epoch535, we find a great revival of philosophical interest, and this revival seems to have been maintained for at least a hundred years, that is to say, through the whole of what is called the age of the Antonines. In the struggle for existence among the rival sects536 which ensued, Platonism started with all the advantages that a great inheritance and a great name could bestow228. At the commencement of this period, we find the Academy once more professing537 to hold the doctrines of its founder in their original purity and completeness. Evidently the sober common-sense view of Antiochus had been discarded, and Plato’s own writings were taken as an authoritative standard of truth. A series of industrious538 commentators539 undertook the task of elucidating their contents. Nor was it only in the schools that their influence was felt. The beauty of their style must have strongly recommended the Dialogues to the attention of literary men. Plutarch, the most considerable Greek writer of his time, was a declared Platonist. So251 also was the brilliant African novelist, Apuleius, who flourished under Marcus Aurelius. Celsus, the celebrated anti-Christian controversialist, and Maximus, the Tyrian rhetorician, professed the same allegiance; and the illustrious physiologist540 Galen shows traces of Platonic influence. Platonism, as first constituted, had been an eminently religious philosophy, and its natural tendencies were still further strengthened at the period of its revival by the great religious reaction which we have been studying in the present chapter; while, conversely, in the struggle for supremacy among rival systems, its affinities541 with the spirit of the age gave it an immense advantage over the sceptical and materialistic philosophies, which brought it into still closer sympathy with the currents of popular opinion. And its partisans were drawn278 even further in the same direction by the influence of Neo-Pythagoreanism, representing, as this did, one among the three or four leading principles which Plato had attempted to combine.
The chief theological doctrines held in common by the two schools, were the immortality of the soul and the existence of daemons. These were supposed to form a class of spiritual beings, intermediate between gods and men, and sharing to some extent in the nature of both. According to Plutarch, though very long-lived, they are not immortal; and he quotes the famous story about the death of Pan in proof of his assertion;390 but, in this respect, his opinion is not shared by Maximus Tyrius391, who expressly declares them to be immortal; and, indeed, one hardly sees how the contrary could have been maintained consistently with Platonic principles; for, if the human soul never dies, much less can spirits of a higher rank be doomed542 to extinction. As a class, the daemons are morally imperfect beings, subject to human passions, and capable of wrong-doing. Like men also, they are divided into good and bad. The former kind perform providential and retributive offices on behalf of the higher252 gods, inspiring oracles, punishing crime, and succouring distress543. Those who permit themselves to be influenced by improper544 motives in the discharge of their appointed functions, are degraded to the condition of human beings. The bad and morose545 sort are propitiated546 by a gloomy and self-tormenting worship.392 By means of the imperfect character thus ascribed to the daemons, a way was found for reconciling the purified theology of Platonism with the old Greek religion. To each of the higher deities there is attached, we are told, a daemon who bears his name and is frequently confounded with him. The immoral547 or unworthy actions narrated548 of the old gods were, in reality, the work of their inferior namesakes. This theory was adopted by the Fathers of the Church, with the difference, however, that they altogether suppressed the higher class of Platonic powers, and identified the daemons with the fallen angels of their own mythology. This is the reason why a word which was not originally used in a bad sense has come to be synonymous with devil.
It was in perfect accordance with the spirit of Greek philosophy, and more particularly of Platonism, that a connecting link should be interposed between earth and heaven, the human and the divine, especially when, as at this time, the supreme creator had come to be isolated in solitary549 splendour from the rest of existence; but it would be a mistake to suppose that the daemons were invented for the purpose to which they were applied. We find them mentioned by Hesiod;393 and they probably represent an even older phase of religious thought than the Olympian gods, being, in fact, a survival of that primitive psychism which peopled the whole universe with life and animation550. This becomes still clearer when we consider that they are described, both under their earliest and their latest Greek form, as being, in part at least, human souls raised after death to a higher sphere of253 activity. Among these, Maximus Tyrius includes the demi-gods of mythology, such as Asclêpius and Heracles, who, as we have seen, were objects of particular veneration under the empire.394 Thus daemon-worship combined three different elements or aspects of the supernaturalist movement:—the free play given to popular imagination by the decay or destruction of the aristocratic organisation of society and religion, the increasing tendency to look for a perpetuation and elevation551 of human existence, and the convergence of philosophical speculation with popular faith.
Daemonism, however, does not fill a very great place in the creed of Plutarch; and a comparison of him with his successors shows that the saner552 traditions of Greek thought only gradually gave way to the rising flood of ignorance and unreason. It is true that, as a moralist, the philosopher of Chaeronea considered religion of inestimable importance to human virtue and human happiness; while, as a historian, he accepted stories of supernatural occurrences with a credulity recalling that of Livy and falling little short of Dion Cassius. Nor did his own Platonistic monotheism prevent him from extending a very generous intellectual toleration to the different forms of polytheism which he found everywhere prevailing.395 In this respect, he and probably all the philosophers of that and the succeeding age, the Epicureans, the Sceptics, and some of the Cynics alone excepted, offer a striking contradiction to one of Gibbon’s most celebrated epigrams. To them the popular religions were not equally false but equally true, and, to a certain extent, equally useful. Where Plutarch drew the line was at what he called Deisidaimonia, the frightful553 mental malady554 which, as already mentioned, began to afflict190 Greece soon after the conquests of Alexander. It is generally translated superstition, but has a much narrower meaning. It expresses the beliefs and feelings of one who lives in perpetual dread of provoking supernatural vengeance555, not254 by wrongful behaviour towards his fellow-men, nor even by intentional556 disrespect towards a higher power, but by the neglect of certain ceremonial observances; and who is constantly on the look-out for heaven-sent prognostications of calamities, which, when they come, will apparently be inflicted557 from sheer ill-will, Plutarch has devoted one of his most famous essays to the castigation558 of this weakness. He deliberately559 prefers atheism560 to it, showing by an elaborate comparison of instances that the former—with which, however, he has no sympathy at all—is much less injurious to human happiness, and involves much less real impiety, than such a constant attribution of meaningless malice561 to the gods. One example of Deisidaimonia adduced by Plutarch is Sabbatarianism, especially when carried, as it had recently been by the Jews during the siege of Jerusalem, to the point of entirely suspending military operations on the day of rest.396 That the belief in daemons, some of whom passed for being malevolent562 powers, might yield a fruitful crop of new superstitions, does not seem to have occurred to Plutarch; still less that the doctrine of future torments563 of which, following Plato’s example, he was a firm upholder, might prove a terror to others besides offenders564 against the moral law,—especially when manipulated by a class whose interest it was to stimulate565 the feeling in question to the utmost possible intensity.
When we pass from Plutarch to Maximus Tyrius and Apuleius, the darkness grows perceptibly thicker, and is no longer broken by the lucida tela diei with which the Theban thinker had combated at least one class of mistaken beliefs. These writers are so occupied with developing the positive aspects of supernaturalism—daemonology, divination, and thaumaturgy—that they can find no place for a protest against its extravagances and perversions566; nor is their mysticism balanced by those extensive applications of philosophy to255 real life, whether under the form of biography or of discourses on practical morality, which enabled Plutarch’s mind to preserve an attitude of comparative sobriety and calmness. Hence while Maximus is absolutely forgotten, and Apuleius remembered only as an amusing story-teller, Plutarch has been perhaps the most successful interpreter between Greek humanity and modern thought. His popularity is now rapidly declining, but the influence exercised by his writings on characters differing so much from one another and from his own as those of Montaigne, Rousseau, and Wordsworth, suffices to prove, if any proof be needed, how deep and wide were the sympathies which they once evoked567.
What progress devotional feeling had made during the interval which separated Apuleius from Plutarch and his school, may be illustrated by a comparison of the terms which they respectively employ in reference to the Egyptian Isis. The author of the treatise on Isis and Osiris identifies the goddess with the female or material, as distinguished from the formative principle in Nature; which, to say the least of it, is not giving her a very exalted rank in the scheme of creation. Apuleius, on the other hand, addresses her, or makes his hero address her, in the following enthusiastic language:—
Holy everlasting Saviour of the human race! Bounteous568 nurse of mortals! Tender mother of the afflicted! Not for a day or night nor even for one little moment dost thou relax thy care for men, driving away the storms of life and stretching forth569 to them the right hand of deliverance, wherewith thou dost unravel570 even the tangled571 threads of fate, soothe572 the storms of fortune, and restrain the hurtful courses of the stars. The gods above adore thee, the gods below respect; thou dost cause the heavens to roll, the sun to shine; the world thou rulest, and treadest Tartarus under foot. To thee the stars reply, for thee the seasons come again; in thee the deities rejoice, and thee the elements obey. At thy nod the breezes blow, the clouds drop fatness, the seeds germinate573 and seedlings574 spring. But my wit is small to celebrate thy praises, my fortune256 poor to pay thee sacrifices, the abundance of my voice does not suffice to tell what I think of thy majesty575, nor would a thousand tongues nor an unwearied and everlasting flow of speech. Therefore what alone religion joined to poverty can achieve, I will provide: an image of thy divine countenance and most holy godhead, guarded for perpetual contemplation within the recesses576 of my heart.397
Doubtless the cool intellect of a Greek and the fervid577 temperament578 of an African would always have expressed themselves in widely different accents. What we have to note is that the one was now taking the place of the other because the atmosphere had been heated up to a point as favourable to passion as it was fatal to thought.
After Apuleius, Platonism, outside the lecture rooms of Athens, becomes identified with Pythagoreanism, and both with dogmatic theology. In this direction, philosophy was feeling its way towards a reconciliation with two great Oriental religions, Hebrew monotheism and Medo-Persian dualism. The first advances had come from religion. Aristobulus, an Alexandrian Jew (B.C. 160), was apparently the first to detect an analogy between the later speculations579 of Plato and his own hereditary580 faith. Both taught that the world had been created by a single supreme God. Both were penetrated with the purest ethical ideas. Both associated sensuality and idolatry in the same vehement581 denunciations. The conclusion was obvious. What had been supernaturally revealed to the chosen people could not have been discovered elsewhere by a simple exercise of human reason. Plato must have borrowed his wisdom from Moses.398 At a later period, the celebrated Philo, following up the clue thus furnished, proceeded to evolve the whole of Greek philosophy from the Pentateuch. An elaborate system of allegorical interpretation, borrowed from the Stoics, was the instrument with which he effected his enterprise. The result was what might have been foreseen—a complete Hellenisation of Hebrew religion.257 Circumscription582, antithesis583, and mediation584 were, as we know, the chief moments of Greek thought. Philo rearranged his monotheistic system according to the scheme which they supplied. He first determined the divine unity with such logical precision as to place God out of relation to the world. Then, in the true Greek spirit, he placed at the other end of his metaphysical scale matter—the shifting, formless, shadowy residuum left behind when every ideal element has been thought away from the world. So conceived, matter became, what it had been to Plato, the principle of all evil, and therefore something with which God could not possibly be brought into contact. Accordingly, the process of creation is made intelligible by the interposition of a connecting link in the shape of certain hypostasised divine attributes or forces, represented as at the same time belonging to and distinct from the divine personality. Of these the most important are the goodness to which the world owes its origin, and the power by which it is governed. Both are united in the Logos or Word. This last idea—which, by the way, was derived not from Plato but from the Stoics—sums up in itself the totality of mediatorial functions by which God and the world are put into communication with one another. In like manner, Plato had interposed a universal soul between his Ideas and the world of sensible appearances, and had pointed279 to an arrangement of the Ideas themselves by which we could ascend147 in thought to a contemplation of the absolute good. There seems, however, to be a difference between the original Hellenic conception and the same conception as adapted to Oriental ways of thinking. With Plato, as with every other Greek philosopher, a mediator585 is introduced not for the purpose of representing the supreme ideal to us nor of transmitting our aspirations to it, but of guiding and facilitating our approach to it, of helping586 us to a perfect apprehension587 and realisation of its meaning. With Philo, on the contrary, the relation of the Logos to God is much the same as that of258 a Grand Vizier to an Oriental Sultan. And, from this point of view, it is very significant that he should compare it to the high-priest who lays the prayers of the people before the eternal throne, especially when we couple this with his declaration that the Logos is the God of us imperfect beings, the first God being reserved for the contemplation of those who are wise and perfect.399
Such a system was likely to result, and before long actually did result, in the realisation of the Logos on earth, in the creation of an inspired and infallible Church, mediating588 between God and man; while it gave increased authority and expansive power to another superstition which already existed in Philo’s time, and of which his Logos doctrine was perhaps only the metaphysical sublimation,—the superstition that the divine Word has been given to mankind under the form of an infallible book. From another point of view, we may discern a certain connexion between the idea that God would be defiled589 by any immediate contact with the material world, and the Sabbatarianism which was so rife440 among Gentiles as well as among Jews at that period. For such a theory of the divine character readily associates itself with the notion that holiness excludes not only material industry but any interest the scope of which is limited to our present life.
That Philo’s interpretation of Platonism ultimately reacted on Greek thought seems certain, but at what date his influence began to tell, and how far it reached, must remain undecided. Plutarch speaks of God’s purity and of his transcendent elevation above the universe in language closely resembling that of the Alexandrian Jew, with whose opinions he may have been indirectly590 acquainted.400 We have already seen how the daemons were employed to fill up the interval thus created, and what serious concessions591 to popular superstition the belief in their activity involved. Still Plutarch259 does not go so far as to say that the world was not created by God. This step was taken by Numenius, a philosopher who flourished about the middle of the second century, and who represents the complete identification of Platonism with Pythagoreanism, already mentioned as characteristic of the period following that date. Numenius is acquainted with Philo’s speculations, and accepts his derivation of Platonism from the Pentateuch. ‘What,’ he asks, ‘is Plato but a Moses writing in the Attic592 dialect?’401 He also accepts the theory that the world was created by a single intermediate agent, whom, however, he credits with a much more distinct and independent personality than Philo could see his way to admitting. And he regards the human soul as a fallen spirit whose life on earth is the consequence of its own sinful desires. From such fancies there was but a single step to the more thorough-going dualism which looks on the material world as entirely evil, and as the creation of a blind or malevolent power. This step had already been taken by Gnosticism. The system so called summed up in itself, more completely, perhaps, than any other, all the convergent593 or conflicting ideas of the age. Greek mythology and Greek philosophy, Zoroastrianism, Judaism, and Christianity each contributed an element to the fantastic and complicated scheme propounded594 by its last great representative, Valentinus. This teacher pitches his conception of the supreme God even higher than Philo, and places him, like Plato’s absolute Good, outside the sphere of being. From him—or it—as from a bottomless gulf595 proceed a vast series of emanations ending in the Demiurgus or creator of the visible world, whose action is described, in language vividly596 recalling the speculations of certain modern metaphysicians, as an enormous blunder. For, according to Gnosticism, the world is not merely infected with evil by participation597 in a material principle, it is evil altogether, and a special intervention598 of260 the higher powers is needed in order to undo492 the work of its delirious author.402 Here we have a particular side of Plato’s philosophy exaggerated and distorted by contact with Zoroastrian dualism. In the Statesman there is a mythical description of two alternate cycles, in one of which the world is governed by a wise providence, while in the other things are abandoned to themselves, and move in a direction the reverse of that originally imposed on them. It is in the latter cycle that Plato supposes us to be moving at present.403 Again, after having been long content to explain the origin of evil by the resistance of inert599 matter to the informing power of ideal goodness, Plato goes a step further in his latest work, the Laws, and hazards the hypothesis of an evil soul actively600 counterworking the beneficent designs of God.404 And we find the same idea subsequently taken up by Plutarch, who sees in it the most efficient means for exonerating601 God from all share in the responsibility for physical disorder602 and moral wrong.405 But both master and disciple restricted the influence of their supposed evil soul within very narrow limits, and they would have repudiated603 with horror such a notion as that the whole visible world is a product of folly604 or of sin.
Gnostic pessimism605 marks the extreme point of aberration606 to which Greek thought was drawn by the attraction of Oriental superstition. How it was rescued from destruction by a new systematisation of its ancient methods and results will be explained in another chapter.
261
X.
In conclusion, a few words may profitably be devoted to the question whether the rationalistic movement of our own age is likely to be followed by such another supernaturalist reaction as that which made itself so powerfully felt during the first centuries of Roman imperialism. There is, no doubt, a certain superficial resemblance between the world of the Caesars and the world in which we live. Everywhere we see aristocracies giving way to more centralised and equitable607 forms of government, the authority of which is sometimes concentrated in the hands of a single absolute ruler. Not only are the interests and wishes of the poorer and less educated classes consulted with increasing anxiety, but the welfare of women is engrossing608 the attention of modern legislators to an even greater extent than was the case with the imperial jurists. Facilities for travelling, joined to the far-reaching combinations of modern statesmanship and modern strategy, are every day bringing Europe into closer contact with the religious life of Asia. The decay of traditional and organised theology is permitting certain forms of spontaneous and unorganised superstition to develope themselves once more, as witness the wide diffusion of spiritism, which is probably akin142 to the demonology and witchcraft609 of earlier ages, and would, no doubt, be similarly persecuted610 by the priests,—who, as it is, attribute spiritualistic manifestations to diabolical611 agency,—had they sufficient power for the purpose. Lastly, corresponding to the syncretism of the Roman empire, we may observe a certain mixture and combination of religious principles, Catholic ideas being avowedly612 adopted by even the most latitudinarian Protestants, and Protestant influences entering into Catholicism, much more imperceptibly it is true, but probably to an equal extent.
The analogy between modern Europe and the Roman262 empire is, however, as we have already hinted, merely superficial. It has been shown in the course of our analysis that to ensure the triumph of superstition in the old world something more was necessary than the destruction of aristocratic government. Every feeling of liberty—except the liberty to die—and almost every feeling of self-respect had to be crushed out by the establishment of an authoritative hierarchy613 extending from the Emperor down to the meanest slaves, before the voice of Hellenic reason could be hushed. But among ourselves it is rather of the opposite fault—of too great independence and individualism—that complaints are heard. If we occasionally see a hereditary monarch25 or a popular minister invested with despotic power, this phenomenon is probably due to the circumstances of a revolutionary period, and will in course of time become more and more exceptional. Flatterers, parasites614, and will-hunters are not an increasing but a diminishing class. Modern officers, as a body, show none of that contempt for reasoning and amenability615 to superstition which characterised the Roman centurions; in France, military men are even distinguished for their deadly hatred of priests. And, what is more important than any other element in our comparison, the reserves which modern civilisation is bringing to the front are of a widely different intellectual stature616 and equipment from their predecessors under Augustus and the Antonines. Since the reorganisation of industry by science, millions of working-men have received an education which prepares them to understand the universality of law much better than the literary education given to their social superiors, which, indeed, bears a remarkable resemblance to the rhetorical and sophistical training enjoyed by the contemporaries of Maximus Tyrius and Apuleius. If as much cannot be said of the middle classes, they are at any rate far more enlightened than Roman provincials, and are likely to improve still further with the spread of education—another peculiarly modern phenomenon.263 On this point we have, indeed, something better to argue from than à priori probabilities. We see before our eyes the rationalistic movement advancing pari passu with the democratic movement, and, in some countries, overtly617 aided by it. To say that this alliance has been provoked by an accidental and temporary association of monarchy618 and aristocracy with Church establishments, is a superficial explanation. The paid advocates of delusion know well where their interest lies. They have learned by experience that democracy means the education of the people, and that the education of the people means the loss of their own prestige. And they know also that, in many cases, the people are already sufficiently619 educated to use political power, once they have obtained it, for the summary destruction of organised and endowed superstition. What has been said of popular influence applies equally to the influence of women. When they were either not educated at all or only received a literary education, every improvement in their position was simply so much ground gained for superstition. The prospect is very different now. Women are beginning to receive a training like that of men, or rather a training superior to what all but a very few men have hitherto enjoyed. And the result is that, wherever this experiment has been tried, they have flung aside traditional beliefs once supposed to be a necessity of their nature even more decisively and disdainfully than have the professors by whom they are taught.
Once more, there was a cause of intellectual degeneration at work in the ancient world, which for us has almost ceased to exist. This was the flood of barbarism which enveloped620 and corrupted621, long before it overwhelmed, the Hellenised civilisation of Rome. But if the danger of such an inundation622 is for ever removed, are we equally secure against the contagion623 of that intellectual miasma624 which broods over the multitudinous barbarian populations among whom we in turn are settling as conquerors and colonists625? Anyone choosing to264 maintain the negative might point to the example of a famous naturalist194 who, besides contributing largely to the advancement626 of his own special science, is also distinguished for high general culture, but whom long residence in the East Indies has fitted to be the dupe of impostures which it is a disgrace even for men and women of fashion to accept. Experience, however, teaches us that, so far at least, there is little danger to be dreaded627 from this quarter. Instead of being prone628 to superstition, Anglo-Indian society is described as prevailingly sceptical or even agnostic; and, in fact, the study of theology in its lowest forms is apt to start a train of reflection not entirely conducive629 to veneration for its more modern developments. For the rest, European enlightenment seems likely to spread faster and farther among the conquered, than Oriental darkness among the conquering race.
So far, we have only considered belief in its relation to the re-distribution of political, social, and national forces. But behind all such forces there is a deeper and more perennial cause of intellectual revolution at work. There is now in the world an organised and ever-growing mass of scientific truths, at least a thousand times greater and a thousand times more diffused than the amount of positive knowledge possessed by mankind in the age of the Antonines. What those truths can do in the future may be inferred from what they have already done in the past. Even the elementary science of Alexandria, though it could not cope with the supernaturalist reaction of the empire, proved strong enough, some centuries later, to check the flood of Mahometan fanaticism630, and for a time to lead captivity631 captive in the very strongholds of militant632 theological belief. When, long afterwards, Jesuitism and Puritanism between them threatened to reconquer all that the humanism of the Renaissance633 had won from superstition, when all Europe from end to end was red with the blood or blackened with the death-fires of heretics and witches, science, which had meanwhile been silently laying the foundations of265 a new kingdom, had but to appear before the eyes of men, and they left the powers of darkness to follow where she led. When the follies634 and excesses of the Revolution provoked another intellectual reaction, her authority reduced it to a mere mimicry635 and shadow of the terrible revenges by which analogous636 epochs in the past history of opinion had been signalised. And this was at a time when the materials of reaction existed in abundance, because the rationalistic movement of the eighteenth century had left the middle and lower classes untouched. At the present moment, Catholicism has no allies but a dispirited, half-sceptical aristocracy; and any appeal to other quarters would show that her former reserves have irrevocably passed over to the foe637. What is more, she has unconsciously been playing the game of rationalism for fifteen centuries. By waging a merciless warfare638 on every other form of superstition, she has done her best to dry up the sources of religious belief. Those whom she calls heathens and pagans lived in an atmosphere of supernaturalism which rendered them far less apt pupils of philosophy than her own children are to-day. It was harder to renounce what she took away than it will be to renounce what she has left, when the truths of science are seen by all, as they are now seen by a few, to involve the admission that there is no object for our devotion but the welfare of sentient639 beings like ourselves; that there are no changes in Nature for which natural forces will not account; and that the unity of all existence has, for us, no individualisation beyond the finite and perishable consciousness of man.
点击收听单词发音
1 civilisation | |
n.文明,文化,开化,教化 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
2 variance | |
n.矛盾,不同 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
3 formerly | |
adv.从前,以前 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
4 stagnation | |
n. 停滞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
5 turpitude | |
n.可耻;邪恶 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
6 indifference | |
n.不感兴趣,不关心,冷淡,不在乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
7 disinterestedness | |
参考例句: |
|
|
8 erred | |
犯错误,做错事( err的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
9 investigators | |
n.调查者,审查者( investigator的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
10 discriminating | |
a.有辨别能力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
11 phenomena | |
n.现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
12 essentially | |
adv.本质上,实质上,基本上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
13 Christian | |
adj.基督教徒的;n.基督教徒 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
14 ecclesiastics | |
n.神职者,教会,牧师( ecclesiastic的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
15 vices | |
缺陷( vice的名词复数 ); 恶习; 不道德行为; 台钳 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
16 virtues | |
美德( virtue的名词复数 ); 德行; 优点; 长处 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
17 virtue | |
n.德行,美德;贞操;优点;功效,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
18 conquerors | |
征服者,占领者( conqueror的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
19 conqueror | |
n.征服者,胜利者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
20 derive | |
v.取得;导出;引申;来自;源自;出自 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
21 derived | |
vi.起源;由来;衍生;导出v.得到( derive的过去式和过去分词 );(从…中)得到获得;源于;(从…中)提取 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
22 cultivation | |
n.耕作,培养,栽培(法),养成 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
23 discredit | |
vt.使不可置信;n.丧失信义;不信,怀疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
24 monarchical | |
adj. 国王的,帝王的,君主的,拥护君主制的 =monarchic | |
参考例句: |
|
|
25 monarch | |
n.帝王,君主,最高统治者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
26 immediate | |
adj.立即的;直接的,最接近的;紧靠的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
27 embittered | |
v.使怨恨,激怒( embitter的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
28 sweeping | |
adj.范围广大的,一扫无遗的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
29 scattered | |
adj.分散的,稀疏的;散步的;疏疏落落的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
30 fully | |
adv.完全地,全部地,彻底地;充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
31 sifted | |
v.筛( sift的过去式和过去分词 );筛滤;细查;详审 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
32 impartial | |
adj.(in,to)公正的,无偏见的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
33 effete | |
adj.无生产力的,虚弱的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
34 regenerated | |
v.新生,再生( regenerate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
35 infusion | |
n.灌输 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
36 converse | |
vi.谈话,谈天,闲聊;adv.相反的,相反 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
37 renovation | |
n.革新,整修 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
38 barbarians | |
n.野蛮人( barbarian的名词复数 );外国人;粗野的人;无教养的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
39 barbarian | |
n.野蛮人;adj.野蛮(人)的;未开化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
40 wrought | |
v.引起;以…原料制作;运转;adj.制造的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
41 domain | |
n.(活动等)领域,范围;领地,势力范围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
42 necessitated | |
使…成为必要,需要( necessitate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
43 resuscitation | |
n.复活 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
44 testimony | |
n.证词;见证,证明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
45 vitality | |
n.活力,生命力,效力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
46 affected | |
adj.不自然的,假装的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
47 prudence | |
n.谨慎,精明,节俭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
48 inscription | |
n.(尤指石块上的)刻印文字,铭文,碑文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
49 inscriptions | |
(作者)题词( inscription的名词复数 ); 献词; 碑文; 证劵持有人的登记 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
50 collated | |
v.校对( collate的过去式和过去分词 );整理;核对;整理(文件或书等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
51 antiquity | |
n.古老;高龄;古物,古迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
52 conversion | |
n.转化,转换,转变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
53 versed | |
adj. 精通,熟练 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
54 intercourse | |
n.性交;交流,交往,交际 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
55 emancipated | |
adj.被解放的,不受约束的v.解放某人(尤指摆脱政治、法律或社会的束缚)( emancipate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
56 diffusion | |
n.流布;普及;散漫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
57 decrepitude | |
n.衰老;破旧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
58 destined | |
adj.命中注定的;(for)以…为目的地的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
59 superstition | |
n.迷信,迷信行为 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
60 undue | |
adj.过分的;不适当的;未到期的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
61 purely | |
adv.纯粹地,完全地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
62 providence | |
n.深谋远虑,天道,天意;远见;节约;上帝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
63 superstitions | |
迷信,迷信行为( superstition的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
64 vigour | |
(=vigor)n.智力,体力,精力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
65 hostility | |
n.敌对,敌意;抵制[pl.]交战,战争 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
66 passionately | |
ad.热烈地,激烈地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
67 immortality | |
n.不死,不朽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
68 immortal | |
adj.不朽的;永生的,不死的;神的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
69 diffused | |
散布的,普及的,扩散的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
70 precisely | |
adv.恰好,正好,精确地,细致地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
71 boundless | |
adj.无限的;无边无际的;巨大的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
72 license | |
n.执照,许可证,特许;v.许可,特许 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
73 tranquillity | |
n. 平静, 安静 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
74 imperialism | |
n.帝国主义,帝国主义政策 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
75 revival | |
n.复兴,复苏,(精力、活力等的)重振 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
76 celebrated | |
adj.有名的,声誉卓著的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
77 animated | |
adj.生气勃勃的,活跃的,愉快的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
78 mandate | |
n.托管地;命令,指示 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
79 provincial | |
adj.省的,地方的;n.外省人,乡下人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
80 provincials | |
n.首都以外的人,地区居民( provincial的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
81 reverent | |
adj.恭敬的,虔诚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
82 primitive | |
adj.原始的;简单的;n.原(始)人,原始事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
83 mere | |
adj.纯粹的;仅仅,只不过 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
84 inevitable | |
adj.不可避免的,必然发生的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
85 advent | |
n.(重要事件等的)到来,来临 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
86 determined | |
adj.坚定的;有决心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
87 exalt | |
v.赞扬,歌颂,晋升,提升 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
88 Founder | |
n.创始者,缔造者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
89 patriot | |
n.爱国者,爱国主义者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
90 prosper | |
v.成功,兴隆,昌盛;使成功,使昌隆,繁荣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
91 anarchy | |
n.无政府状态;社会秩序混乱,无秩序 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
92 superstitious | |
adj.迷信的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
93 augur | |
n.占卦师;v.占卦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
94 sincerity | |
n.真诚,诚意;真实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
95 frivolous | |
adj.轻薄的;轻率的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
96 initiated | |
n. 创始人 adj. 新加入的 vt. 开始,创始,启蒙,介绍加入 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
97 craving | |
n.渴望,热望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
98 abeyance | |
n.搁置,缓办,中止,产权未定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
99 creeds | |
(尤指宗教)信条,教条( creed的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
100 creed | |
n.信条;信念,纲领 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
101 rigid | |
adj.严格的,死板的;刚硬的,僵硬的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
102 organisation | |
n.组织,安排,团体,有机休 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
103 patriotism | |
n.爱国精神,爱国心,爱国主义 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
104 adverse | |
adj.不利的;有害的;敌对的,不友好的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
105 unity | |
n.团结,联合,统一;和睦,协调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
106 guardianship | |
n. 监护, 保护, 守护 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
107 guardian | |
n.监护人;守卫者,保护者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
108 deities | |
n.神,女神( deity的名词复数 );神祗;神灵;神明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
109 jurisdictions | |
司法权( jurisdiction的名词复数 ); 裁判权; 管辖区域; 管辖范围 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
110 jurisdiction | |
n.司法权,审判权,管辖权,控制权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
111 prospect | |
n.前景,前途;景色,视野 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
112 dependence | |
n.依靠,依赖;信任,信赖;隶属 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
113 adherents | |
n.支持者,拥护者( adherent的名词复数 );党羽;徒子徒孙 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
114 adoption | |
n.采用,采纳,通过;收养 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
115 allure | |
n.诱惑力,魅力;vt.诱惑,引诱,吸引 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
116 stratagems | |
n.诡计,计谋( stratagem的名词复数 );花招 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
117 strata | |
n.地层(复数);社会阶层 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
118 besieging | |
包围,围困,围攻( besiege的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
119 considerably | |
adv.极大地;相当大地;在很大程度上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
120 mitigated | |
v.减轻,缓和( mitigate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
121 intensity | |
n.强烈,剧烈;强度;烈度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
122 aggregations | |
n.聚集( aggregation的名词复数 );集成;集结;聚集体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
123 cosmopolitan | |
adj.世界性的,全世界的,四海为家的,全球的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
124 migratory | |
n.候鸟,迁移 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
125 authoritative | |
adj.有权威的,可相信的;命令式的;官方的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
126 favourable | |
adj.赞成的,称赞的,有利的,良好的,顺利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
127 missionaries | |
n.传教士( missionary的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
128 dissemination | |
传播,宣传,传染(病毒) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
129 metaphor | |
n.隐喻,暗喻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
130 eminently | |
adv.突出地;显著地;不寻常地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
131 eminent | |
adj.显赫的,杰出的,有名的,优良的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
132 patriotic | |
adj.爱国的,有爱国心的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
133 partisans | |
游击队员( partisan的名词复数 ); 党人; 党羽; 帮伙 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
134 supremacy | |
n.至上;至高权力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
135 perfectly | |
adv.完美地,无可非议地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
136 bigotry | |
n.偏见,偏执,持偏见的行为[态度]等 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
137 equanimity | |
n.沉着,镇定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
138 inevitably | |
adv.不可避免地;必然发生地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
139 proscription | |
n.禁止,剥夺权利 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
140 delirious | |
adj.不省人事的,神智昏迷的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
141 supreme | |
adj.极度的,最重要的;至高的,最高的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
142 akin | |
adj.同族的,类似的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
143 insurgents | |
n.起义,暴动,造反( insurgent的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
144 opposition | |
n.反对,敌对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
145 reactionary | |
n.反动者,反动主义者;adj.反动的,反动主义的,反对改革的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
146 speculative | |
adj.思索性的,暝想性的,推理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
147 ascend | |
vi.渐渐上升,升高;vt.攀登,登上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
148 emancipating | |
v.解放某人(尤指摆脱政治、法律或社会的束缚)( emancipate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
149 sarcasms | |
n.讥讽,讽刺,挖苦( sarcasm的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
150 procured | |
v.(努力)取得, (设法)获得( procure的过去式和过去分词 );拉皮条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
151 equestrian | |
adj.骑马的;n.马术 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
152 pecuniary | |
adj.金钱的;金钱上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
153 guilt | |
n.犯罪;内疚;过失,罪责 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
154 sordid | |
adj.肮脏的,不干净的,卑鄙的,暗淡的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
155 retired | |
adj.隐退的,退休的,退役的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
156 centurions | |
n.百人队长,百夫长(古罗马的军官,指挥百人)( centurion的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
157 remarkable | |
adj.显著的,异常的,非凡的,值得注意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
158 imbued | |
v.使(某人/某事)充满或激起(感情等)( imbue的过去式和过去分词 );使充满;灌输;激发(强烈感情或品质等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
159 standing | |
n.持续,地位;adj.永久的,不动的,直立的,不流动的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
160 apparition | |
n.幽灵,神奇的现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
161 ethics | |
n.伦理学;伦理观,道德标准 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
162 crates | |
n. 板条箱, 篓子, 旧汽车 vt. 装进纸条箱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
163 suburban | |
adj.城郊的,在郊区的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
164 aspired | |
v.渴望,追求( aspire的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
165 aspire | |
vi.(to,after)渴望,追求,有志于 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
166 doctrine | |
n.教义;主义;学说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
167 legendary | |
adj.传奇(中)的,闻名遐迩的;n.传奇(文学) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
168 intrigue | |
vt.激起兴趣,迷住;vi.耍阴谋;n.阴谋,密谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
169 entirely | |
ad.全部地,完整地;完全地,彻底地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
170 bequest | |
n.遗赠;遗产,遗物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
171 possessed | |
adj.疯狂的;拥有的,占有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
172 expended | |
v.花费( expend的过去式和过去分词 );使用(钱等)做某事;用光;耗尽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
173 munificence | |
n.宽宏大量,慷慨给与 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
174 unlimited | |
adj.无限的,不受控制的,无条件的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
175 apparently | |
adv.显然地;表面上,似乎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
176 discoursing | |
演说(discourse的现在分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
177 stoic | |
n.坚忍克己之人,禁欲主义者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
178 inquisitive | |
adj.求知欲强的,好奇的,好寻根究底的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
179 inquisitiveness | |
好奇,求知欲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
180 depressed | |
adj.沮丧的,抑郁的,不景气的,萧条的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
181 satires | |
讽刺,讥讽( satire的名词复数 ); 讽刺作品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
182 satire | |
n.讽刺,讽刺文学,讽刺作品 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
183 devoted | |
adj.忠诚的,忠实的,热心的,献身于...的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
184 enumeration | |
n.计数,列举;细目;详表;点查 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
185 emancipation | |
n.(从束缚、支配下)解放 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
186 intimacy | |
n.熟悉,亲密,密切关系,亲昵的言行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
187 submission | |
n.服从,投降;温顺,谦虚;提出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
188 miseries | |
n.痛苦( misery的名词复数 );痛苦的事;穷困;常发牢骚的人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
189 consolatory | |
adj.慰问的,可藉慰的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
190 afflict | |
vt.使身体或精神受痛苦,折磨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
191 cults | |
n.迷信( cult的名词复数 );狂热的崇拜;(有极端宗教信仰的)异教团体 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
192 disciples | |
n.信徒( disciple的名词复数 );门徒;耶稣的信徒;(尤指)耶稣十二门徒之一 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
193 disciple | |
n.信徒,门徒,追随者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
194 naturalist | |
n.博物学家(尤指直接观察动植物者) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
195 mingled | |
混合,混入( mingle的过去式和过去分词 ); 混进,与…交往[联系] | |
参考例句: |
|
|
196 judgment | |
n.审判;判断力,识别力,看法,意见 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
197 honourably | |
adv.可尊敬地,光荣地,体面地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
198 distinguished | |
adj.卓越的,杰出的,著名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
199 ignoble | |
adj.不光彩的,卑鄙的;可耻的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
200 obsequiousness | |
媚骨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
201 doles | |
救济物( dole的名词复数 ); 失业救济金 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
202 legacy | |
n.遗产,遗赠;先人(或过去)留下的东西 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
203 famished | |
adj.饥饿的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
204 nominally | |
在名义上,表面地; 应名儿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
205 trudging | |
vt.& vi.跋涉,吃力地走(trudge的现在分词形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
206 retinue | |
n.侍从;随员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
207 admiration | |
n.钦佩,赞美,羡慕 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
208 deference | |
n.尊重,顺从;敬意 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
209 assent | |
v.批准,认可;n.批准,认可 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
210 condescended | |
屈尊,俯就( condescend的过去式和过去分词 ); 故意表示和蔼可亲 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
211 lavished | |
v.过分给予,滥施( lavish的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
212 lavish | |
adj.无节制的;浪费的;vt.慷慨地给予,挥霍 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
213 advantageous | |
adj.有利的;有帮助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
214 unwillingness | |
n. 不愿意,不情愿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
215 perpetuation | |
n.永存,不朽 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
216 consolidation | |
n.合并,巩固 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
217 suffrages | |
(政治性选举的)选举权,投票权( suffrage的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
218 vicissitudes | |
n.变迁,世事变化;变迁兴衰( vicissitude的名词复数 );盛衰兴废 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
219 bereavement | |
n.亲人丧亡,丧失亲人,丧亲之痛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
220 triumphant | |
adj.胜利的,成功的;狂欢的,喜悦的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
221 innovating | |
v.改革,创新( innovate的现在分词 );引入(新事物、思想或方法), | |
参考例句: |
|
|
222 reverence | |
n.敬畏,尊敬,尊严;Reverence:对某些基督教神职人员的尊称;v.尊敬,敬畏,崇敬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
223 reverenced | |
v.尊敬,崇敬( reverence的过去式和过去分词 );敬礼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
224 authentic | |
a.真的,真正的;可靠的,可信的,有根据的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
225 celebrity | |
n.名人,名流;著名,名声,名望 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
226 veneration | |
n.尊敬,崇拜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
227 bestowed | |
赠给,授予( bestow的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
228 bestow | |
v.把…赠与,把…授予;花费 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
229 homage | |
n.尊敬,敬意,崇敬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
230 ornamented | |
adj.花式字体的v.装饰,点缀,美化( ornament的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
231 treatise | |
n.专著;(专题)论文 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
232 mythical | |
adj.神话的;虚构的;想像的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
233 interpretation | |
n.解释,说明,描述;艺术处理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
234 interpretations | |
n.解释( interpretation的名词复数 );表演;演绎;理解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
235 dedicated | |
adj.一心一意的;献身的;热诚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
236 deity | |
n.神,神性;被奉若神明的人(或物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
237 adoration | |
n.爱慕,崇拜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
238 arbiters | |
仲裁人,裁决者( arbiter的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
239 disastrous | |
adj.灾难性的,造成灾害的;极坏的,很糟的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
240 dealing | |
n.经商方法,待人态度 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
241 faction | |
n.宗派,小集团;派别;派系斗争 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
242 conformity | |
n.一致,遵从,顺从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
243 prescription | |
n.处方,开药;指示,规定 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
244 prescriptions | |
药( prescription的名词复数 ); 处方; 开处方; 计划 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
245 mischievously | |
adv.有害地;淘气地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
246 mischievous | |
adj.调皮的,恶作剧的,有害的,伤人的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
247 scruple | |
n./v.顾忌,迟疑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
248 scruples | |
n.良心上的不安( scruple的名词复数 );顾虑,顾忌v.感到于心不安,有顾忌( scruple的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
249 countenance | |
n.脸色,面容;面部表情;vt.支持,赞同 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
250 vanquished | |
v.征服( vanquish的过去式和过去分词 );战胜;克服;抑制 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
251 abominable | |
adj.可厌的,令人憎恶的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
252 abstain | |
v.自制,戒绝,弃权,避免 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
253 lighting | |
n.照明,光线的明暗,舞台灯光 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
254 amiable | |
adj.和蔼可亲的,友善的,亲切的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
255 reign | |
n.统治时期,统治,支配,盛行;v.占优势 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
256 alludes | |
提及,暗指( allude的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
257 scrupulously | |
adv.一丝不苟地;小心翼翼地,多顾虑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
258 hatred | |
n.憎恶,憎恨,仇恨 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
259 supersede | |
v.替代;充任 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
260 embodied | |
v.表现( embody的过去式和过去分词 );象征;包括;包含 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
261 influx | |
n.流入,注入 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
262 implored | |
恳求或乞求(某人)( implore的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
263 dedication | |
n.奉献,献身,致力,题献,献辞 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
264 anomalous | |
adj.反常的;不规则的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
265 elastic | |
n.橡皮圈,松紧带;adj.有弹性的;灵活的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
266 mythology | |
n.神话,神话学,神话集 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
267 previously | |
adv.以前,先前(地) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
268 isolated | |
adj.与世隔绝的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
269 amalgamate | |
v.(指业务等)合并,混合 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
270 amalgam | |
n.混合物;汞合金 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
271 unifying | |
使联合( unify的现在分词 ); 使相同; 使一致; 统一 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
272 exclusion | |
n.拒绝,排除,排斥,远足,远途旅行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
273 complexity | |
n.复杂(性),复杂的事物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
274 decomposed | |
已分解的,已腐烂的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
275 perennial | |
adj.终年的;长久的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
276 vigilantly | |
adv.警觉地,警惕地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
277 withdrawn | |
vt.收回;使退出;vi.撤退,退出 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
278 drawn | |
v.拖,拉,拔出;adj.憔悴的,紧张的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
279 pointed | |
adj.尖的,直截了当的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
280 oracle | |
n.神谕,神谕处,预言 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
281 fixed | |
adj.固定的,不变的,准备好的;(计算机)固定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
282 veracity | |
n.诚实 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
283 augury | |
n.预言,征兆,占卦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
284 piety | |
n.虔诚,虔敬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
285 ethical | |
adj.伦理的,道德的,合乎道德的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
286 consultation | |
n.咨询;商量;商议;会议 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
287 superfluous | |
adj.过多的,过剩的,多余的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
288 auditors | |
n.审计员,稽核员( auditor的名词复数 );(大学课程的)旁听生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
289 dispensing | |
v.分配( dispense的现在分词 );施与;配(药) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
290 oracles | |
神示所( oracle的名词复数 ); 神谕; 圣贤; 哲人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
291 omens | |
n.前兆,预兆( omen的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
292 peculiar | |
adj.古怪的,异常的;特殊的,特有的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
293 cowardice | |
n.胆小,怯懦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
294 stoics | |
禁欲主义者,恬淡寡欲的人,不以苦乐为意的人( stoic的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
295 divination | |
n.占卜,预测 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
296 narratives | |
记叙文( narrative的名词复数 ); 故事; 叙述; 叙述部分 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
297 prodigies | |
n.奇才,天才(尤指神童)( prodigy的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
298 sundry | |
adj.各式各样的,种种的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
299 catastrophes | |
n.灾祸( catastrophe的名词复数 );灾难;不幸事件;困难 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
300 credulous | |
adj.轻信的,易信的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
301 transcribed | |
(用不同的录音手段)转录( transcribe的过去式和过去分词 ); 改编(乐曲)(以适应他种乐器或声部); 抄写; 用音标标出(声音) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
302 trifling | |
adj.微不足道的;没什么价值的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
303 starry | |
adj.星光照耀的, 闪亮的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
304 regained | |
复得( regain的过去式和过去分词 ); 赢回; 重回; 复至某地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
305 locomotion | |
n.运动,移动 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
306 miraculous | |
adj.像奇迹一样的,不可思议的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
307 anecdote | |
n.轶事,趣闻,短故事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
308 impiety | |
n.不敬;不孝 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
309 purport | |
n.意义,要旨,大要;v.意味著,做为...要旨,要领是... | |
参考例句: |
|
|
310 consternation | |
n.大为吃惊,惊骇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
311 adventurous | |
adj.爱冒险的;惊心动魄的,惊险的,刺激的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
312 charlatan | |
n.骗子;江湖医生;假内行 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
313 imposing | |
adj.使人难忘的,壮丽的,堂皇的,雄伟的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
314 effrontery | |
n.厚颜无耻 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
315 strings | |
n.弦 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
316 spoke | |
n.(车轮的)辐条;轮辐;破坏某人的计划;阻挠某人的行动 v.讲,谈(speak的过去式);说;演说;从某种观点来说 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
317 minor | |
adj.较小(少)的,较次要的;n.辅修学科;vi.辅修 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
318 thronged | |
v.成群,挤满( throng的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
319 scarcity | |
n.缺乏,不足,萧条 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
320 lucrative | |
adj.赚钱的,可获利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
321 contrived | |
adj.不自然的,做作的;虚构的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
322 Christians | |
n.基督教徒( Christian的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
323 morass | |
n.沼泽,困境 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
324 consular | |
a.领事的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
325 abject | |
adj.极可怜的,卑屈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
326 delusion | |
n.谬见,欺骗,幻觉,迷惑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
327 shrine | |
n.圣地,神龛,庙;v.将...置于神龛内,把...奉为神圣 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
328 inflame | |
v.使燃烧;使极度激动;使发炎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
329 refinement | |
n.文雅;高尚;精美;精制;精炼 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
330 imposture | |
n.冒名顶替,欺骗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
331 discomfiture | |
n.崩溃;大败;挫败;困惑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
332 promptly | |
adv.及时地,敏捷地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
333 professed | |
公开声称的,伪称的,已立誓信教的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
334 celestial | |
adj.天体的;天上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
335 defiance | |
n.挑战,挑衅,蔑视,违抗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
336 entreat | |
v.恳求,恳请 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
337 promising | |
adj.有希望的,有前途的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
338 foretold | |
v.预言,预示( foretell的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
339 lasting | |
adj.永久的,永恒的;vbl.持续,维持 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
340 prophesied | |
v.预告,预言( prophesy的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
341 impaired | |
adj.受损的;出毛病的;有(身体或智力)缺陷的v.损害,削弱( impair的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
342 mishap | |
n.不幸的事,不幸;灾祸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
343 allusions | |
暗指,间接提到( allusion的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
344 treatises | |
n.专题著作,专题论文,专著( treatise的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
345 compilation | |
n.编译,编辑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
346 elucidating | |
v.阐明,解释( elucidate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
347 manifestation | |
n.表现形式;表明;现象 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
348 manifestations | |
n.表示,显示(manifestation的复数形式) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
349 gauge | |
v.精确计量;估计;n.标准度量;计量器 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
350 bigoted | |
adj.固执己见的,心胸狭窄的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
351 blasphemous | |
adj.亵渎神明的,不敬神的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
352 salvation | |
n.(尤指基督)救世,超度,拯救,解困 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
353 awakening | |
n.觉醒,醒悟 adj.觉醒中的;唤醒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
354 redounding | |
v.有助益( redound的现在分词 );及于;报偿;报应 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
355 redound | |
v.有助于;提;报应 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
356 acting | |
n.演戏,行为,假装;adj.代理的,临时的,演出用的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
357 choir | |
n.唱诗班,唱诗班的席位,合唱团,舞蹈团;v.合唱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
358 saviour | |
n.拯救者,救星 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
359 struts | |
(框架的)支杆( strut的名词复数 ); 支柱; 趾高气扬的步态; (尤指跳舞或表演时)卖弄 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
360 crest | |
n.顶点;饰章;羽冠;vt.达到顶点;vi.形成浪尖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
361 warrior | |
n.勇士,武士,斗士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
362 irrational | |
adj.无理性的,失去理性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
363 brutes | |
兽( brute的名词复数 ); 畜生; 残酷无情的人; 兽性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
364 rape | |
n.抢夺,掠夺,强奸;vt.掠夺,抢夺,强奸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
365 ripen | |
vt.使成熟;vi.成熟 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
366 nibbling | |
v.啃,一点一点地咬(吃)( nibble的现在分词 );啃出(洞),一点一点咬出(洞);慢慢减少;小口咬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
367 consecrated | |
adj.神圣的,被视为神圣的v.把…奉为神圣,给…祝圣( consecrate的过去式和过去分词 );奉献 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
368 predilections | |
n.偏爱,偏好,嗜好( predilection的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
369 invoked | |
v.援引( invoke的过去式和过去分词 );行使(权利等);祈求救助;恳求 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
370 chamber | |
n.房间,寝室;会议厅;议院;会所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
371 afflicted | |
使受痛苦,折磨( afflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
372 calamities | |
n.灾祸,灾难( calamity的名词复数 );不幸之事 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
373 exorbitant | |
adj.过分的;过度的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
374 epidemic | |
n.流行病;盛行;adj.流行性的,流传极广的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
375 ransom | |
n.赎金,赎身;v.赎回,解救 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
376 monks | |
n.修道士,僧侣( monk的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
377 sane | |
adj.心智健全的,神志清醒的,明智的,稳健的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
378 orations | |
n.(正式仪式中的)演说,演讲( oration的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
379 devout | |
adj.虔诚的,虔敬的,衷心的 (n.devoutness) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
380 redeem | |
v.买回,赎回,挽回,恢复,履行(诺言等) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
381 bestowing | |
砖窑中砖堆上层已烧透的砖 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
382 apotheosis | |
n.神圣之理想;美化;颂扬 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
383 machinery | |
n.(总称)机械,机器;机构 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
384 voluptuous | |
adj.肉欲的,骄奢淫逸的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
385 motives | |
n.动机,目的( motive的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
386 defender | |
n.保卫者,拥护者,辩护人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
387 insignificant | |
adj.无关紧要的,可忽略的,无意义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
388 repudiating | |
v.(正式地)否认( repudiate的现在分词 );拒绝接受;拒绝与…往来;拒不履行(法律义务) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
389 prevailing | |
adj.盛行的;占优势的;主要的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
390 philosophical | |
adj.哲学家的,哲学上的,达观的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
391 repose | |
v.(使)休息;n.安息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
392 exhort | |
v.规劝,告诫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
393 noted | |
adj.著名的,知名的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
394 applied | |
adj.应用的;v.应用,适用 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
395 absurdity | |
n.荒谬,愚蠢;谬论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
396 everlasting | |
adj.永恒的,持久的,无止境的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
397 corporeal | |
adj.肉体的,身体的;物质的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
398 gaseous | |
adj.气体的,气态的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
399 fiery | |
adj.燃烧着的,火红的;暴躁的;激烈的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
400 extinction | |
n.熄灭,消亡,消灭,灭绝,绝种 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
401 injustice | |
n.非正义,不公正,不公平,侵犯(别人的)权利 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
402 transformation | |
n.变化;改造;转变 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
403 renounce | |
v.放弃;拒绝承认,宣布与…断绝关系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
404 peripatetic | |
adj.漫游的,逍遥派的,巡回的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
405 commentator | |
n.注释者,解说者;实况广播评论员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
406 perishable | |
adj.(尤指食物)易腐的,易坏的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
407 boon | |
n.恩赐,恩物,恩惠 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
408 pangs | |
突然的剧痛( pang的名词复数 ); 悲痛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
409 physiological | |
adj.生理学的,生理学上的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
410 conjecture | |
n./v.推测,猜测 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
411 doctrines | |
n.教条( doctrine的名词复数 );教义;学说;(政府政策的)正式声明 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
412 funereal | |
adj.悲哀的;送葬的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
413 ERECTED | |
adj. 直立的,竖立的,笔直的 vt. 使 ... 直立,建立 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
414 enfranchised | |
v.给予选举权( enfranchise的过去式和过去分词 );(从奴隶制中)解放 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
415 mouldering | |
v.腐朽( moulder的现在分词 );腐烂,崩塌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
416 abode | |
n.住处,住所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
417 dwelling | |
n.住宅,住所,寓所 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
418 recurs | |
再发生,复发( recur的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
419 platonic | |
adj.精神的;柏拉图(哲学)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
420 exalted | |
adj.(地位等)高的,崇高的;尊贵的,高尚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
421 aspirations | |
强烈的愿望( aspiration的名词复数 ); 志向; 发送气音; 发 h 音 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
422 subterranean | |
adj.地下的,地表下的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
423 grotesque | |
adj.怪诞的,丑陋的;n.怪诞的图案,怪人(物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
424 penetrated | |
adj. 击穿的,鞭辟入里的 动词penetrate的过去式和过去分词形式 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
425 ornaments | |
n.装饰( ornament的名词复数 );点缀;装饰品;首饰v.装饰,点缀,美化( ornament的第三人称单数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
426 irresistible | |
adj.非常诱人的,无法拒绝的,无法抗拒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
427 underlying | |
adj.在下面的,含蓄的,潜在的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
428 stratum | |
n.地层,社会阶层 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
429 abodes | |
住所( abode的名词复数 ); 公寓; (在某地的)暂住; 逗留 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
430 symbolical | |
a.象征性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
431 deduction | |
n.减除,扣除,减除额;推论,推理,演绎 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
432 consolation | |
n.安慰,慰问 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
433 bereaved | |
adj.刚刚丧失亲人的v.使失去(希望、生命等)( bereave的过去式和过去分词);(尤指死亡)使丧失(亲人、朋友等);使孤寂;抢走(财物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
434 survivor | |
n.生存者,残存者,幸存者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
435 joyous | |
adj.充满快乐的;令人高兴的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
436 enrolling | |
v.招收( enrol的现在分词 );吸收;入学;加入;[亦作enrol]( enroll的现在分词 );登记,招收,使入伍(或入会、入学等),参加,成为成员;记入名册;卷起,包起 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
437 renewal | |
adj.(契约)延期,续订,更新,复活,重来 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
438 conjugal | |
adj.婚姻的,婚姻性的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
439 strife | |
n.争吵,冲突,倾轧,竞争 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
440 rife | |
adj.(指坏事情)充斥的,流行的,普遍的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
441 remains | |
n.剩余物,残留物;遗体,遗迹 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
442 repulsive | |
adj.排斥的,使人反感的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
443 hideous | |
adj.丑陋的,可憎的,可怕的,恐怖的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
444 virulence | |
n.毒力,毒性;病毒性;致病力 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
445 apparitions | |
n.特异景象( apparition的名词复数 );幽灵;鬼;(特异景象等的)出现 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
446 implicitly | |
adv. 含蓄地, 暗中地, 毫不保留地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
447 evoke | |
vt.唤起,引起,使人想起 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
448 conjuring | |
n.魔术 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
449 addicted | |
adj.沉溺于....的,对...上瘾的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
450 sect | |
n.派别,宗教,学派,派系 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
451 predecessors | |
n.前任( predecessor的名词复数 );前辈;(被取代的)原有事物;前身 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
452 predecessor | |
n.前辈,前任 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
453 concession | |
n.让步,妥协;特许(权) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
454 intelligible | |
adj.可理解的,明白易懂的,清楚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
455 obedience | |
n.服从,顺从 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
456 dictates | |
n.命令,规定,要求( dictate的名词复数 )v.大声讲或读( dictate的第三人称单数 );口授;支配;摆布 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
457 psychology | |
n.心理,心理学,心理状态 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
458 eternity | |
n.不朽,来世;永恒,无穷 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
459 ambiguity | |
n.模棱两可;意义不明确 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
460 justified | |
a.正当的,有理的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
461 questionable | |
adj.可疑的,有问题的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
462 animating | |
v.使有生气( animate的现在分词 );驱动;使栩栩如生地动作;赋予…以生命 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
463 devoutness | |
朝拜 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
464 amenable | |
adj.经得起检验的;顺从的;对负有义务的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
465 prominence | |
n.突出;显著;杰出;重要 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
466 prosecuted | |
a.被起诉的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
467 solely | |
adv.仅仅,唯一地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
468 intensified | |
v.(使)增强, (使)加剧( intensify的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
469 teleology | |
n.目的论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
470 blessings | |
n.(上帝的)祝福( blessing的名词复数 );好事;福分;因祸得福 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
471 humble | |
adj.谦卑的,恭顺的;地位低下的;v.降低,贬低 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
472 entrusted | |
v.委托,托付( entrust的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
473 perilous | |
adj.危险的,冒险的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
474 discourses | |
论文( discourse的名词复数 ); 演说; 讲道; 话语 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
475 insignificance | |
n.不重要;无价值;无意义 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
476 illustrate | |
v.举例说明,阐明;图解,加插图 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
477 illustrated | |
adj. 有插图的,列举的 动词illustrate的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
478 diminutives | |
n.微小( diminutive的名词复数 );昵称,爱称 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
479 habitually | |
ad.习惯地,通常地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
480 component | |
n.组成部分,成分,元件;adj.组成的,合成的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
481 prostration | |
n. 平伏, 跪倒, 疲劳 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
482 favourably | |
adv. 善意地,赞成地 =favorably | |
参考例句: |
|
|
483 materialism | |
n.[哲]唯物主义,唯物论;物质至上 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
484 incompatibility | |
n.不兼容 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
485 virtuous | |
adj.有品德的,善良的,贞洁的,有效力的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
486 portents | |
n.预兆( portent的名词复数 );征兆;怪事;奇物 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
487 expenditure | |
n.(时间、劳力、金钱等)支出;使用,消耗 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
488 dictated | |
v.大声讲或读( dictate的过去式和过去分词 );口授;支配;摆布 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
489 profane | |
adj.亵神的,亵渎的;vt.亵渎,玷污 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
490 purporting | |
v.声称是…,(装得)像是…的样子( purport的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
491 specifies | |
v.指定( specify的第三人称单数 );详述;提出…的条件;使具有特性 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
492 undo | |
vt.解开,松开;取消,撤销 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
493 undoubtedly | |
adv.确实地,无疑地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
494 incur | |
vt.招致,蒙受,遭遇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
495 omission | |
n.省略,删节;遗漏或省略的事物,冗长 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
496 bribed | |
v.贿赂( bribe的过去式和过去分词 );向(某人)行贿,贿赂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
497 iniquitous | |
adj.不公正的;邪恶的;高得出奇的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
498 virulent | |
adj.有毒的,有恶意的,充满敌意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
499 reconciliation | |
n.和解,和谐,一致 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
500 accomplished | |
adj.有才艺的;有造诣的;达到了的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
501 speculation | |
n.思索,沉思;猜测;投机 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
502 psychism | |
心灵论 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
503 meditations | |
默想( meditation的名词复数 ); 默念; 沉思; 冥想 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
504 thoroughly | |
adv.完全地,彻底地,十足地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
505 repel | |
v.击退,抵制,拒绝,排斥 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
506 poetical | |
adj.似诗人的;诗一般的;韵文的;富有诗意的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
507 radically | |
ad.根本地,本质地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
508 jugglery | |
n.杂耍,把戏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
509 asceticism | |
n.禁欲主义 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
510 dread | |
vt.担忧,忧虑;惧怕,不敢;n.担忧,畏惧 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
511 vegetarian | |
n.素食者;adj.素食的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
512 disappearance | |
n.消失,消散,失踪 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
513 materialistic | |
a.唯物主义的,物质享乐主义的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
514 utilitarian | |
adj.实用的,功利的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
515 permeating | |
弥漫( permeate的现在分词 ); 遍布; 渗入; 渗透 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
516 immured | |
v.禁闭,监禁( immure的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
517 expiation | |
n.赎罪,补偿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
518 alleged | |
a.被指控的,嫌疑的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
519 uncommon | |
adj.罕见的,非凡的,不平常的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
520 wholesale | |
n.批发;adv.以批发方式;vt.批发,成批出售 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
521 encumbered | |
v.妨碍,阻碍,拖累( encumber的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
522 relics | |
[pl.]n.遗物,遗迹,遗产;遗体,尸骸 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
523 extrication | |
n.解脱;救出,解脱 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
524 transcended | |
超出或超越(经验、信念、描写能力等)的范围( transcend的过去式和过去分词 ); 优于或胜过… | |
参考例句: |
|
|
525 interfere | |
v.(in)干涉,干预;(with)妨碍,打扰 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
526 contention | |
n.争论,争辩,论战;论点,主张 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
527 animates | |
v.使有生气( animate的第三人称单数 );驱动;使栩栩如生地动作;赋予…以生命 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
528 defiling | |
v.玷污( defile的现在分词 );污染;弄脏;纵列行进 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
529 impurity | |
n.不洁,不纯,杂质 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
530 linen | |
n.亚麻布,亚麻线,亚麻制品;adj.亚麻布制的,亚麻的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
531 interfering | |
adj. 妨碍的 动词interfere的现在分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
532 interval | |
n.间隔,间距;幕间休息,中场休息 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
533 professes | |
声称( profess的第三人称单数 ); 宣称; 公开表明; 信奉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
534 controversy | |
n.争论,辩论,争吵 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
535 epoch | |
n.(新)时代;历元 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
536 sects | |
n.宗派,教派( sect的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
537 professing | |
声称( profess的现在分词 ); 宣称; 公开表明; 信奉 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
538 industrious | |
adj.勤劳的,刻苦的,奋发的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
539 commentators | |
n.评论员( commentator的名词复数 );时事评论员;注释者;实况广播员 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
540 physiologist | |
n.生理学家 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
541 affinities | |
n.密切关系( affinity的名词复数 );亲近;(生性)喜爱;类同 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
542 doomed | |
命定的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
543 distress | |
n.苦恼,痛苦,不舒适;不幸;vt.使悲痛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
544 improper | |
adj.不适当的,不合适的,不正确的,不合礼仪的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
545 morose | |
adj.脾气坏的,不高兴的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
546 propitiated | |
v.劝解,抚慰,使息怒( propitiate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
547 immoral | |
adj.不道德的,淫荡的,荒淫的,有伤风化的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
548 narrated | |
v.故事( narrate的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
549 solitary | |
adj.孤独的,独立的,荒凉的;n.隐士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
550 animation | |
n.活泼,兴奋,卡通片/动画片的制作 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
551 elevation | |
n.高度;海拔;高地;上升;提高 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
552 saner | |
adj.心智健全的( sane的比较级 );神志正常的;明智的;稳健的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
553 frightful | |
adj.可怕的;讨厌的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
554 malady | |
n.病,疾病(通常做比喻) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
555 vengeance | |
n.报复,报仇,复仇 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
556 intentional | |
adj.故意的,有意(识)的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
557 inflicted | |
把…强加给,使承受,遭受( inflict的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
558 castigation | |
n.申斥,强烈反对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
559 deliberately | |
adv.审慎地;蓄意地;故意地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
560 atheism | |
n.无神论,不信神 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
561 malice | |
n.恶意,怨恨,蓄意;[律]预谋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
562 malevolent | |
adj.有恶意的,恶毒的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
563 torments | |
(肉体或精神上的)折磨,痛苦( torment的名词复数 ); 造成痛苦的事物[人] | |
参考例句: |
|
|
564 offenders | |
n.冒犯者( offender的名词复数 );犯规者;罪犯;妨害…的人(或事物) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
565 stimulate | |
vt.刺激,使兴奋;激励,使…振奋 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
566 perversions | |
n.歪曲( perversion的名词复数 );变坏;变态心理 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
567 evoked | |
[医]诱发的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
568 bounteous | |
adj.丰富的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
569 forth | |
adv.向前;向外,往外 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
570 unravel | |
v.弄清楚(秘密);拆开,解开,松开 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
571 tangled | |
adj. 纠缠的,紊乱的 动词tangle的过去式和过去分词 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
572 soothe | |
v.安慰;使平静;使减轻;缓和;奉承 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
573 germinate | |
v.发芽;发生;发展 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
574 seedlings | |
n.刚出芽的幼苗( seedling的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
575 majesty | |
n.雄伟,壮丽,庄严,威严;最高权威,王权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
576 recesses | |
n.壁凹( recess的名词复数 );(工作或业务活动的)中止或暂停期间;学校的课间休息;某物内部的凹形空间v.把某物放在墙壁的凹处( recess的第三人称单数 );将(墙)做成凹形,在(墙)上做壁龛;休息,休会,休庭 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
577 fervid | |
adj.热情的;炽热的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
578 temperament | |
n.气质,性格,性情 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
579 speculations | |
n.投机买卖( speculation的名词复数 );思考;投机活动;推断 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
580 hereditary | |
adj.遗传的,遗传性的,可继承的,世袭的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
581 vehement | |
adj.感情强烈的;热烈的;(人)有强烈感情的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
582 circumscription | |
n.界限;限界 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
583 antithesis | |
n.对立;相对 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
584 mediation | |
n.调解 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
585 mediator | |
n.调解人,中介人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
586 helping | |
n.食物的一份&adj.帮助人的,辅助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
587 apprehension | |
n.理解,领悟;逮捕,拘捕;忧虑 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
588 mediating | |
调停,调解,斡旋( mediate的现在分词 ); 居间促成; 影响…的发生; 使…可能发生 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
589 defiled | |
v.玷污( defile的过去式和过去分词 );污染;弄脏;纵列行进 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
590 indirectly | |
adv.间接地,不直接了当地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
591 concessions | |
n.(尤指由政府或雇主给予的)特许权( concession的名词复数 );承认;减价;(在某地的)特许经营权 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
592 attic | |
n.顶楼,屋顶室 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
593 convergent | |
adj.会聚的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
594 propounded | |
v.提出(问题、计划等)供考虑[讨论],提议( propound的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
595 gulf | |
n.海湾;深渊,鸿沟;分歧,隔阂 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
596 vividly | |
adv.清楚地,鲜明地,生动地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
597 participation | |
n.参与,参加,分享 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
598 intervention | |
n.介入,干涉,干预 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
599 inert | |
adj.无活动能力的,惰性的;迟钝的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
600 actively | |
adv.积极地,勤奋地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
601 exonerating | |
v.使免罪,免除( exonerate的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
602 disorder | |
n.紊乱,混乱;骚动,骚乱;疾病,失调 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
603 repudiated | |
v.(正式地)否认( repudiate的过去式和过去分词 );拒绝接受;拒绝与…往来;拒不履行(法律义务) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
604 folly | |
n.愚笨,愚蠢,蠢事,蠢行,傻话 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
605 pessimism | |
n.悲观者,悲观主义者,厌世者 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
606 aberration | |
n.离开正路,脱离常规,色差 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
607 equitable | |
adj.公平的;公正的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
608 engrossing | |
adj.使人全神贯注的,引人入胜的v.使全神贯注( engross的现在分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
609 witchcraft | |
n.魔法,巫术 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
610 persecuted | |
(尤指宗教或政治信仰的)迫害(~sb. for sth.)( persecute的过去式和过去分词 ); 烦扰,困扰或骚扰某人 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
611 diabolical | |
adj.恶魔似的,凶暴的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
612 avowedly | |
adv.公然地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
613 hierarchy | |
n.等级制度;统治集团,领导层 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
614 parasites | |
寄生物( parasite的名词复数 ); 靠他人为生的人; 诸虫 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
615 amenability | |
n.服从的义务 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
616 stature | |
n.(高度)水平,(高度)境界,身高,身材 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
617 overtly | |
ad.公开地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
618 monarchy | |
n.君主,最高统治者;君主政体,君主国 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
619 sufficiently | |
adv.足够地,充分地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
620 enveloped | |
v.包围,笼罩,包住( envelop的过去式和过去分词 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
621 corrupted | |
(使)败坏( corrupt的过去式和过去分词 ); (使)腐化; 引起(计算机文件等的)错误; 破坏 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
622 inundation | |
n.the act or fact of overflowing | |
参考例句: |
|
|
623 contagion | |
n.(通过接触的疾病)传染;蔓延 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
624 miasma | |
n.毒气;不良气氛 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
625 colonists | |
n.殖民地开拓者,移民,殖民地居民( colonist的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
626 advancement | |
n.前进,促进,提升 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
627 dreaded | |
adj.令人畏惧的;害怕的v.害怕,恐惧,担心( dread的过去式和过去分词) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
628 prone | |
adj.(to)易于…的,很可能…的;俯卧的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
629 conducive | |
adj.有益的,有助的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
630 fanaticism | |
n.狂热,盲信 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
631 captivity | |
n.囚禁;被俘;束缚 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
632 militant | |
adj.激进的,好斗的;n.激进分子,斗士 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
633 renaissance | |
n.复活,复兴,文艺复兴 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
634 follies | |
罪恶,时事讽刺剧; 愚蠢,蠢笨,愚蠢的行为、思想或做法( folly的名词复数 ) | |
参考例句: |
|
|
635 mimicry | |
n.(生物)拟态,模仿 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
636 analogous | |
adj.相似的;类似的 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
637 foe | |
n.敌人,仇敌 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
638 warfare | |
n.战争(状态);斗争;冲突 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
639 sentient | |
adj.有知觉的,知悉的;adv.有感觉能力地 | |
参考例句: |
|
|
欢迎访问英文小说网 |